Provenance Gold Corp.

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while FNLPF trades at $55.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 89.39. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check FNLPF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ANGPY trades at $18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 379.60. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ANGPY's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while IMPUY trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 429.40. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check IMPUY's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while IMPUF trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check IMPUF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while MMSMY trades at $46.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check MMSMY's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while JINFF trades at $26.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check JINFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while GMINF trades at $39.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check GMINF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check XZJCF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while OICT trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check OICT's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check NMPNF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ABBRF trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -115.51. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ABBRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ZMPLF trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ZMPLF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while POYYF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check POYYF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while GLGDF trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check GLGDF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check AUCOY's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while TIHRF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check TIHRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check FCSUF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while BKRRF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check BKRRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SAPLF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SAPLF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SLVTF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -72.91. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SLVTF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while BRVMF trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -113.83. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check BRVMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while IAUFF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check IAUFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check TPRFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while HGLD trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check HGLD's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 288.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while GOTRF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check GOTRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SMDRF trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SMDRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while CHPGF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -83.75. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check CHPGF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SSVFF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SSVFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while PAASF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check PAASF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ORVMF trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ORVMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while CAPTF trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -168.10. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check CAPTF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while TBXXF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check TBXXF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check BOCOF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SNNGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SNNGF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check PLLHF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while XANAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check XANAF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while AGLDF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check AGLDF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while OCGSF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check OCGSF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while NAUFF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check NAUFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SCTSF trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SCTSF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SDRC trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -312.10. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SDRC's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ACRG trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -17.76. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ACRG's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while EMPYF trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check EMPYF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while PGLDF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check PGLDF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check CTNXF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while LGCXF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check LGCXF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ELRFF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ELRFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while TEUTF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -28.17. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check TEUTF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while TSORF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check TSORF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while AMNP trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check AMNP's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check LUCRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while DNCVF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check DNCVF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while AGMRF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check AGMRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while THMG trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -43.98. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check THMG's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while KDKCF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check KDKCF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while LBCMF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check LBCMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while VIPRF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check VIPRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while EQMEF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check EQMEF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check HEGLF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while VLMGF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check VLMGF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ARRKF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ARRKF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while BBBXF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check BBBXF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while MMNGF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check MMNGF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while CPPMF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check CPPMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while DNRSF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check DNRSF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while BRGC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check BRGC's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ACKRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SMOFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check PDLMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check VTXXF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while EMPPF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check EMPPF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ATEPF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ATEPF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check CTMCF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while RKHNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check RKHNF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while KGFMF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check KGFMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ADYRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while DYNR trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check DYNR's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while PNTRF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check PNTRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SSVRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check HMRRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while MRZLF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check MRZLF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check CJIMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while WEXPF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check WEXPF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check OKPRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while WAMFF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check WAMFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while RITE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check RITE's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check TLSMF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ZLME trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PVGDF has daily volatility of 10.76 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SUNPF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SUNPF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ESGLF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ESGLF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check GLDRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check ASLRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SBMCF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while STRFF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check STRFF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SHGDF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check AUCUF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while URVNF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check URVNF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while SBLRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +5.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check SBLRF's competition here

PVGDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVGDF stands at 37.7M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVGDF is priced at $0.22, while GSMGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVGDF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.50, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, PVGDF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PVGDF is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVGDF.Check GSMGF's competition here