PURE Bioscience, Inc.
PURE Bioscience, Inc. PURE Peers
See (PURE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PURE | $0.07 | +10.89% | 7.32M | -3.27 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| LRLCF | $431.74 | -2.67% | 230.68B | 31.91 | $13.53 | +1.83% |
| LRLCY | $83.30 | -3.30% | 222.54B | 30.74 | $2.71 | +1.43% |
| UNLYF | $62.98 | +5.05% | 157.50B | 24.41 | $2.58 | +2.99% |
| RBGLY | $12.70 | -0.47% | 43.56B | 23.52 | $0.54 | +4.12% |
| RBGPF | $63.81 | N/A | 43.49B | 23.55 | $2.71 | +4.09% |
| HELKF | $72.01 | -12.98% | 31.53B | 13.31 | $5.41 | +2.86% |
| HENKY | $17.69 | +0.17% | 31.31B | 13.20 | $1.34 | +2.46% |
| HENOY | $19.63 | -0.23% | 31.18B | 14.65 | $1.34 | +2.25% |
| BDRFF | $138.46 | N/A | 30.91B | 30.23 | $4.58 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
PURE vs LRLCF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 230.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while LRLCF trades at $431.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs LRLCY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 222.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while LRLCY trades at $83.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs UNLYF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 157.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while UNLYF trades at $62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs RBGLY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 43.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while RBGLY trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs RBGPF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 43.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while RBGPF trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HELKF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 31.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HELKF trades at $72.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HENKY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 31.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HENKY trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HENOY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 31.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HENOY trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BDRFF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 30.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BDRFF trades at $138.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HENOF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 30.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HENOF trades at $77.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BDRFY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 30.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BDRFY trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KAOCF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KAOCF trades at $44.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KAOOY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 19.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KAOOY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs ETTYF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 19.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while ETTYF trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs UNICY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 13.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while UNICY trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs UNCHF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 13.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while UNCHF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SSDOY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SSDOY trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -236.57. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs LCCTF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SSDOF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SSDOF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -214.29. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KCDMF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KCDMF trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs LIOPY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while LIOPY trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KCDMY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KCDMY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BICEY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BICEY trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs RPHCF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while RPHCF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs UNLRY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while UNLRY trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs NTCOY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs UNLRF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while UNLRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs VDAHF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HEGIY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HEGIY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HEGIF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HEGIF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs VDAHY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KBYPF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BICEF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BICEF trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KOSCF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs LIOPF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs FACYF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while FACYF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PORBF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PORBF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KSRYY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KSRYY trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs MIOFF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BLUMY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BLUMY trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs ONXYY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while ONXYY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PGENY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PGENY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PIGEF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs OLVI Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while OLVI trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SRTSF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 890.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs DUNIY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs ONXXF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 671.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while ONXXF trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs MDOMF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs WPNTF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs YAMNF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PZCUY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 445.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs MCBRF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 329.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while MCBRF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs UNHLF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 196.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while UNHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KITAF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 130.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KITAF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs NBBTF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 116.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while NBBTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs RVIV Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while RVIV trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KPTSF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 60.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KPTSF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PRFUF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 26.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PRFUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs DQWS Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 18.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while DQWS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DQWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs FDOGF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 11.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SNBH Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 10.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SNBH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs MIMNF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs CAWW Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 5.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while CAWW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs ZOONF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs MAVBF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs REVRQ Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SPCO Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SPCO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SKVI Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SKVI trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs NUVI Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while NUVI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs ZRVT Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while ZRVT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs CLGOF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while CLGOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SLGD Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812885.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SLGD trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SLGD's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs NASO Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 688514.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while NASO trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PYCT Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 553705.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PYCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PHLI Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438307.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PHLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs TVOG Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 423590.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while TVOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs WNBD Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 349998.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while WNBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HRSR Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185621.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HRSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs EESO Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72920.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while EESO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs EOSS Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60478.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while EOSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs QNTA Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40659.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while QNTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SYHO Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39592.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SYHO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs GRBG Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 38971.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while GRBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs JOEY Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28244.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while JOEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SNST Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26592.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SNST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BRSHF Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 23440.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs INBI Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18146.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while INBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs HPTN Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17808.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while HPTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs GYSN Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 13983.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while GYSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs KPOC Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13743.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while KPOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs NUUU Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11776.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while NUUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NUUU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs EMPO Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6279.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while EMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to EMPO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs BEUT Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3192.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while BEUT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs NCDP Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1848.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while NCDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs MDAV Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1424.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while MDAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs PCGR Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while PCGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs RBCL Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while RBCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is less volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.
PURE vs SOYO Comparison
PURE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PURE stands at 7.32M. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62.00. Regarding current trading prices, PURE is priced at $0.07, while SOYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PURE currently has a P/E ratio of -3.27, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PURE's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PURE is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PURE.