Probe Gold Inc.
Probe Gold Inc. PROBF Peers
See (PROBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROBF | $1.82 | +5.81% | 371.2M | -15.17 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.40 | +5.26% | 68.4B | 12.63 | $0.19 | +2.21% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $22.75 | -1.77% | 20.4B | 16.49 | $1.38 | +2.60% |
| NESRF | $13.45 | +9.80% | 19.2B | 25.38 | $0.53 | +1.65% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.42% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.4B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PROBF vs ZIJMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ZIJMF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs OPYGY Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs GFIOF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while GFIOF trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs NESRF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while NESRF trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs NSTYY Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs HCHDY Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs NCMGY Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs NCMGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs KOZAY Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs CAHPF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while CAHPF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs LUGDF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while LUGDF trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs HGMCF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while HGMCF trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ZHAOF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs AULGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs EDVMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while EDVMF trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -72.86. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SBYSF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SBYSF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs DGMLF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ARGTF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ARGTF trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -227.29. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs PMNXF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while PMNXF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ZIJMY Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ZIJMY trades at $45.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs OCANF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while OCANF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs TORXF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while TORXF trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs CRNLF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while CRNLF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 49.85. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs DPMLF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while DPMLF trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs GRLGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while GRLGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -18.72. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs KNTNF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while KNTNF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RGRNF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RGRNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -324.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ELKMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ELKMF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs GSISF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs CELTF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs REDLF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RMLRF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RMLRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs WDOFF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while WDOFF trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs CXBMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while CXBMF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs HCHDF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while HCHDF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs WFRSF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while WFRSF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs EOGSF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ORAAF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ORAAF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs DRDGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs PAFRF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs OBNNF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MAUTF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MAUTF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs AURQF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MWSNF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 953.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MWSNF trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -74.80. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SVLKF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs BELGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while BELGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SGSVF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RUPRF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 870.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RUPRF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -186.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SNWGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SNWGF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs KRRGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RMGGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 851.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RMGGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs PDIYF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 698.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while PDIYF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs WTGRF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RGDFF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs GUYGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 570M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while GUYGF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MNSAF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 528.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MNSAF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs NVMLF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ORZCF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 471.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ORZCF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ARNGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ASGOF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 421.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ASGOF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs KSKGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ECRTF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs LMGDF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 373.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while LMGDF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RSRBF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 353.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RSRBF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MNDJF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 350.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MNDJF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs TPRXF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RIOFF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RIOFF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs THXPF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while THXPF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs FDMIF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 316.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while FDMIF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -36.94. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ALKEF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs RMLFF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 287.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while RMLFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MGDPF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MAKOF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MAKOF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs OGNRF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while OGNRF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 133.22. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ELEMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ELEMF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs OSIIF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs ERRSF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs HSTXF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while HSTXF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs WRLGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while WRLGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs JAGGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 205M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while JAGGF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -32.30. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SAAGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs CNLMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SRBIF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SRBIF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs OMGGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 189.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while OMGGF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -31.03. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs DCCNF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs THSGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while THSGF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs CNMXF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs STBMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while STBMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs STPGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while STPGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs GDRZF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while GDRZF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs EEYMF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs GGAZF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while GGAZF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs AGXKF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MAIFF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MAIFF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs DNGDF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while DNGDF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs NVOOF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs MFGCF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, MFGCF has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while MFGCF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas MFGCF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MFGCF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to MFGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs FFMGF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while FFMGF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.
PROBF vs SITKF Comparison
PROBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROBF stands at 371.2M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROBF is priced at $1.82, while SITKF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROBF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.17, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -33.06. In terms of profitability, PROBF's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROBF is more volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROBF.