Parker Corporation
Parker Corporation (PRKCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PRKCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRKCF | $3.55 | +0.00% | 112.2M | 7.24 | $0.49 | N/A |
| IDDWF | $26.45 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 34.35 | $0.77 | +1.13% |
| TMTNF | $99.00 | +1.98% | 8B | 22.50 | $4.40 | +1.45% |
| ADRZY | $15.50 | -0.64% | 7.6B | 13.60 | $1.14 | +3.99% |
| ADRZF | $69.99 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 12.28 | $5.70 | +4.01% |
| REECF | $9.12 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 24.00 | $0.38 | +1.78% |
| FINGF | $43.75 | -0.93% | 5.8B | 16.89 | $2.59 | +1.84% |
| EENEF | $8.27 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 18.80 | $0.44 | +3.55% |
| GROUF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 11.70 | $0.94 | +4.44% |
| RUSMF | $32.28 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 16.64 | $1.94 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
PRKCF vs IDDWF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, IDDWF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while IDDWF trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas IDDWF's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDDWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to IDDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check IDDWF's competition here
PRKCF vs TMTNF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while TMTNF trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check TMTNF's competition here
PRKCF vs ADRZY Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ADRZY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and ADRZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADRZY's competition here
PRKCF vs ADRZF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ADRZF trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and ADRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADRZF's competition here
PRKCF vs REECF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while REECF trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check REECF's competition here
PRKCF vs FINGF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while FINGF trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and FINGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FINGF's competition here
PRKCF vs EENEF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while EENEF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and EENEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EENEF's competition here
PRKCF vs GROUF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while GROUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and GROUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GROUF's competition here
PRKCF vs RUSMF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while RUSMF trades at $32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and RUSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUSMF's competition here
PRKCF vs HDIUF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 534.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while HDIUF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and HDIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDIUF's competition here
PRKCF vs WJXFF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while WJXFF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and WJXFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WJXFF's competition here
PRKCF vs KHDHF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while KHDHF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check KHDHF's competition here
PRKCF vs HPURF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while HPURF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check HPURF's competition here
PRKCF vs CVTYF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and CVTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVTYF's competition here
PRKCF vs EMPS Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and EMPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPS's competition here
PRKCF vs TXHG Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TXHG's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check TXHG's competition here
PRKCF vs VVWT Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 189.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while VVWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check VVWT's competition here
PRKCF vs GYOG Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and GYOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYOG's competition here
PRKCF vs CDIIQ Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check CDIIQ's competition here
PRKCF vs MJHI Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and MJHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MJHI's competition here
PRKCF vs PHOT Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while PHOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and PHOT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHOT's competition here
PRKCF vs UMAM Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while UMAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and UMAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UMAM's competition here
PRKCF vs ORGH Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ORGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check ORGH's competition here
PRKCF vs PUDA Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and PUDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUDA's competition here
PRKCF vs VALV Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while VALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and VALV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VALV's competition here
PRKCF vs WARM Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 862. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and WARM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WARM's competition here
PRKCF vs SLUP Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check SLUP's competition here
PRKCF vs CGDI Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and CGDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGDI's competition here
PRKCF vs HESV Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and HESV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HESV's competition here
PRKCF vs ZAHA Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and ZAHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZAHA's competition here
PRKCF vs WPMLF Comparison July 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check WPMLF's competition here