Parker Corporation
Parker Corporation (PRKCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PRKCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRKCF | $3.55 | +0.00% | 112.2M | 7.24 | $0.49 | N/A |
| IDDWF | $26.45 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 34.35 | $0.77 | +1.13% |
| TMTNF | $102.97 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 24.17 | $4.26 | +1.39% |
| ADRZY | $14.95 | -1.29% | 7.3B | 13.59 | $1.10 | +4.14% |
| ADRZF | $69.99 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 12.80 | $5.47 | +4.02% |
| FINGF | $40.70 | -1.54% | 5.4B | 15.13 | $2.69 | +2.03% |
| REECF | $8.00 | -12.28% | 5.2B | 21.05 | $0.38 | +1.97% |
| EENEF | $8.27 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 18.80 | $0.44 | +3.57% |
| GROUF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 11.70 | $0.94 | +7.66% |
| RUSMF | $30.11 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 14.48 | $2.08 | +4.03% |
Stock Comparison
PRKCF vs IDDWF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, IDDWF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while IDDWF trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas IDDWF's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDDWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to IDDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check IDDWF's competition here
PRKCF vs TMTNF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while TMTNF trades at $102.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and TMTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMTNF's competition here
PRKCF vs ADRZY Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ADRZY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check ADRZY's competition here
PRKCF vs ADRZF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ADRZF trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check ADRZF's competition here
PRKCF vs FINGF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while FINGF trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check FINGF's competition here
PRKCF vs REECF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while REECF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check REECF's competition here
PRKCF vs EENEF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while EENEF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and EENEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EENEF's competition here
PRKCF vs GROUF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while GROUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and GROUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GROUF's competition here
PRKCF vs RUSMF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while RUSMF trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to RUSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check RUSMF's competition here
PRKCF vs HDIUF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 597.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while HDIUF trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to HDIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check HDIUF's competition here
PRKCF vs WJXFF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while WJXFF trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check WJXFF's competition here
PRKCF vs KHDHF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while KHDHF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check KHDHF's competition here
PRKCF vs HPURF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while HPURF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check HPURF's competition here
PRKCF vs CVTYF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and CVTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVTYF's competition here
PRKCF vs EMPS Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and EMPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPS's competition here
PRKCF vs TXHG Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TXHG's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check TXHG's competition here
PRKCF vs VVWT Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 368.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while VVWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check VVWT's competition here
PRKCF vs GYOG Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and GYOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYOG's competition here
PRKCF vs PHOT Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 22.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while PHOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and PHOT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHOT's competition here
PRKCF vs CDIIQ Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check CDIIQ's competition here
PRKCF vs MJHI Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and MJHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MJHI's competition here
PRKCF vs WARM Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to WARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check WARM's competition here
PRKCF vs UMAM Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while UMAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and UMAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UMAM's competition here
PRKCF vs ORGH Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ORGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check ORGH's competition here
PRKCF vs PUDA Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and PUDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUDA's competition here
PRKCF vs VALV Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while VALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and VALV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VALV's competition here
PRKCF vs SLUP Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check SLUP's competition here
PRKCF vs CGDI Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and CGDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGDI's competition here
PRKCF vs HESV Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and HESV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HESV's competition here
PRKCF vs ZAHA Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF and ZAHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZAHA's competition here
PRKCF vs WPMLF Comparison August 2025
PRKCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRKCF stands at 112.2M. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PRKCF is priced at $3.55, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRKCF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.24, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRKCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRKCF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRKCF.Check WPMLF's competition here