PacifiCorp
PacifiCorp PPWLO Peers
See (PPWLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.79B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| IBDSF | $17.90 | +2.70% | 111.70B | 25.94 | $0.69 | +2.90% |
| IBDRY | $70.43 | +0.21% | 109.87B | 25.43 | $2.77 | +2.84% |
| ESOCF | $8.88 | +0.34% | 90.17B | 12.00 | $0.74 | +5.80% |
| ENLAY | $8.85 | +0.91% | 89.87B | 11.80 | $0.75 | +4.70% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69.00B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | N/A | 53.61B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | N/A | 53.15B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| ENGQF | $20.75 | -3.91% | 50.32B | 11.21 | $1.85 | +9.04% |
| ENGIY | $20.52 | +0.15% | 49.87B | 11.09 | $1.85 | +6.59% |
Stock Comparison
PPWLO vs IBDSF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 111.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while IBDSF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs IBDRY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 109.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while IBDRY trades at $70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ESOCF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 90.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ESOCF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ENLAY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 89.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ENLAY trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs PPWLM Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ECIFF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ECIFY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ENGQF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 50.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ENGQF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ENGIY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 49.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ENGIY trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs EONGY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 44.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while EONGY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ENAKF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 44.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ENAKF trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs RWNFF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 28.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while RWNFF trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs RWEOY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 26.74B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while RWEOY trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs SSEZY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 25.87B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while SSEZY trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs SSEZF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 24.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while SSEZF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs EDPFY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while EDPFY trades at $38.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ELCPF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ELCPF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CHUEF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CHUEF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs AEMMF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs AEMMY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while AEMMY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CDUUF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CDUAF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CDUAF trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CUTLF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CUTLF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CNAUF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CNAUF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CDUTF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CNUTF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs HRASF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while HRASF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ACEJF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ACLLF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ACLLF trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ACLTF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ACLTF trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs IRDEF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while IRDEF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CSGEF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs IRDEY Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs VETTF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while VETTF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs GLVNF Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs PBEV Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5110.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PBEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs CMNR Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3076.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CMNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.
PPWLO vs ARAO Comparison
PPWLO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLO stands at 54.79B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 694.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLO is priced at $153.45, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLO currently has a P/E ratio of 64.53, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLO's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLO is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLO.