Canadian Utilities Limited
Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUTF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDUTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDUTF | $17.56 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 14.92 | $1.18 | +4.57% |
| IBDSF | $23.90 | +1.51% | 161.3B | 24.11 | $0.99 | +3.27% |
| IBDRY | $94.23 | +0.67% | 155.1B | 23.80 | $3.95 | +3.33% |
| ENLAY | $11.47 | -0.27% | 115.2B | 24.96 | $0.46 | +4.94% |
| ESOCF | $11.51 | -0.45% | 113.5B | 24.86 | $0.46 | +4.72% |
| ENGQF | $34.18 | +1.87% | 87.5B | 19.46 | $1.77 | +4.89% |
| ENGIY | $33.39 | +0.68% | 84.6B | 18.82 | $1.77 | +5.03% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | N/A |
| ENAKF | $23.09 | -2.98% | 60.3B | 29.60 | $0.78 | +2.91% |
| EONGY | $22.00 | -2.35% | 57.5B | 28.19 | $0.78 | +3.06% |
Stock Comparison
CDUTF vs IBDSF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 161.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while IBDSF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check IBDSF's competition here
CDUTF vs IBDRY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while IBDRY trades at $94.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check IBDRY's competition here
CDUTF vs ENLAY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ENLAY trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ENLAY's competition here
CDUTF vs ESOCF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 113.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ESOCF trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ESOCF's competition here
CDUTF vs ENGQF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ENGQF trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ENGQF's competition here
CDUTF vs ENGIY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ENGIY trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ENGIY's competition here
CDUTF vs PPWLM Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check PPWLM's competition here
CDUTF vs ENAKF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ENAKF trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ENAKF's competition here
CDUTF vs EONGY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while EONGY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check EONGY's competition here
CDUTF vs PPWLO Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check PPWLO's competition here
CDUTF vs ECIFF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ECIFF's competition here
CDUTF vs ECIFY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ECIFY's competition here
CDUTF vs RWEOY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while RWEOY trades at $71.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check RWEOY's competition here
CDUTF vs RWNFF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while RWNFF trades at $70.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check RWNFF's competition here
CDUTF vs SSEZY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while SSEZY trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check SSEZY's competition here
CDUTF vs SSEZF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while SSEZF trades at $34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check SSEZF's competition here
CDUTF vs ELCPF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ELCPF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ELCPF's competition here
CDUTF vs EDPFY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while EDPFY trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check EDPFY's competition here
CDUTF vs CHUEF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CHUEF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CHUEF's competition here
CDUTF vs AEMMY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while AEMMY trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check AEMMY's competition here
CDUTF vs AEMMF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while AEMMF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check AEMMF's competition here
CDUTF vs CDUAF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CDUAF trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 320.64. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CDUAF's competition here
CDUTF vs CDUUF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CDUUF's competition here
CDUTF vs HRASF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while HRASF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check HRASF's competition here
CDUTF vs CNAUF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CNAUF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CNAUF's competition here
CDUTF vs ACLTF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ACLTF trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ACLTF's competition here
CDUTF vs CUTLF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CUTLF trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CUTLF's competition here
CDUTF vs ACLLF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ACLLF trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ACLLF's competition here
CDUTF vs ACEJF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ACEJF's competition here
CDUTF vs CSGEF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CSGEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CSGEF's competition here
CDUTF vs IRDEY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while IRDEY trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check IRDEY's competition here
CDUTF vs IRDEF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while IRDEF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check IRDEF's competition here
CDUTF vs CNUTF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CNUTF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CNUTF's competition here
CDUTF vs VETTF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while VETTF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check VETTF's competition here
CDUTF vs GLVNF Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check GLVNF's competition here
CDUTF vs ARAO Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check ARAO's competition here
CDUTF vs PBEV Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check PBEV's competition here
CDUTF vs CMNR Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check CMNR's competition here
CDUTF vs EVNVY Comparison April 2026
CDUTF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUTF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDUTF is priced at $17.56, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUTF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.92, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CDUTF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUTF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUTF.Check EVNVY's competition here