PacifiCorp
PacifiCorp (PPWLM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPWLM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +3.62% |
| IBDRY | $70.15 | -0.75% | 114.1B | 20.07 | $3.51 | +3.81% |
| IBDSF | $17.50 | -1.96% | 114.1B | 20.00 | $0.88 | +3.33% |
| ENLAY | $8.81 | -0.90% | 91.3B | 11.15 | $0.79 | +4.32% |
| ESOCF | $8.77 | -3.86% | 91.2B | 11.37 | $0.79 | +5.57% |
| ENGQF | $23.87 | +3.38% | 58.5B | 12.43 | $1.94 | +6.99% |
| ENGIY | $22.53 | -0.95% | 55.9B | 11.67 | $1.94 | +7.40% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +3.62% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | +0.00% | 53.6B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | +0.00% | 53.1B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PPWLM vs IBDRY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IBDRY trades at $70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check IBDRY's competition here
PPWLM vs IBDSF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IBDSF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check IBDSF's competition here
PPWLM vs ENLAY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENLAY trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ENLAY's competition here
PPWLM vs ESOCF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ESOCF trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ESOCF's competition here
PPWLM vs ENGQF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENGQF trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ENGQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGQF's competition here
PPWLM vs ENGIY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENGIY trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ENGIY's competition here
PPWLM vs PPWLO Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check PPWLO's competition here
PPWLM vs ECIFF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ECIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECIFF's competition here
PPWLM vs ECIFY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ECIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECIFY's competition here
PPWLM vs ENAKF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENAKF trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ENAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENAKF's competition here
PPWLM vs EONGY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while EONGY trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check EONGY's competition here
PPWLM vs RWNFF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while RWNFF trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check RWNFF's competition here
PPWLM vs RWEOY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while RWEOY trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check RWEOY's competition here
PPWLM vs SSEZY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while SSEZY trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check SSEZY's competition here
PPWLM vs SSEZF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while SSEZF trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and SSEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSEZF's competition here
PPWLM vs EDPFY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while EDPFY trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check EDPFY's competition here
PPWLM vs ELCPF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ELCPF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ELCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELCPF's competition here
PPWLM vs CHUEF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CHUEF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CHUEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHUEF's competition here
PPWLM vs AEMMF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check AEMMF's competition here
PPWLM vs AEMMY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while AEMMY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check AEMMY's competition here
PPWLM vs CDUUF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CDUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDUUF's competition here
PPWLM vs CDUAF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CDUAF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CDUAF's competition here
PPWLM vs CUTLF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CUTLF trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CUTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUTLF's competition here
PPWLM vs CDUTF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CDUTF's competition here
PPWLM vs CNUTF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CNUTF's competition here
PPWLM vs CNAUF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CNAUF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CNAUF's competition here
PPWLM vs HRASF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while HRASF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check HRASF's competition here
PPWLM vs ACEJF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ACEJF's competition here
PPWLM vs ACLLF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ACLLF trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ACLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACLLF's competition here
PPWLM vs ACLTF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ACLTF trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ACLTF's competition here
PPWLM vs IRDEF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IRDEF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and IRDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRDEF's competition here
PPWLM vs CSGEF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CSGEF's competition here
PPWLM vs VETTF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while VETTF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and VETTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VETTF's competition here
PPWLM vs IRDEY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and IRDEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRDEY's competition here
PPWLM vs GLVNF Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and GLVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLVNF's competition here
PPWLM vs PBEV Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and PBEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBEV's competition here
PPWLM vs CMNR Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CMNR's competition here
PPWLM vs ARAO Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 694. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ARAO's competition here
PPWLM vs EVNVY Comparison July 2025
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +0.79%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and EVNVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVNVY's competition here