PacifiCorp
PacifiCorp (PPWLM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPWLM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | N/A |
| IBDSF | $22.90 | -3.58% | 154.8B | 24.11 | $0.95 | +3.17% |
| IBDRY | $93.46 | +1.63% | 153.6B | 24.73 | $3.79 | +3.19% |
| ESOCF | $11.24 | +5.32% | 111.6B | 16.60 | $0.67 | +5.08% |
| ENLAY | $11.38 | +8.07% | 108.6B | 15.06 | $0.71 | +4.03% |
| ENGQF | $31.36 | -0.64% | 75.6B | 12.91 | $2.41 | +5.42% |
| ENGIY | $31.34 | +0.61% | 75.5B | 12.90 | $2.41 | +5.42% |
| ENAKF | $23.18 | +0.00% | 58.8B | 16.81 | $1.34 | +2.74% |
| EONGY | $21.94 | -0.09% | 57.6B | 16.32 | $1.35 | +2.81% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PPWLM vs IBDSF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 154.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IBDSF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check IBDSF's competition here
PPWLM vs IBDRY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IBDRY trades at $93.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check IBDRY's competition here
PPWLM vs ESOCF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ESOCF trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ESOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESOCF's competition here
PPWLM vs ENLAY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENLAY trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ENLAY's competition here
PPWLM vs ENGQF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENGQF trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ENGQF's competition here
PPWLM vs ENGIY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENGIY trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ENGIY's competition here
PPWLM vs ENAKF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ENAKF trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ENAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENAKF's competition here
PPWLM vs EONGY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while EONGY trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check EONGY's competition here
PPWLM vs PPWLO Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check PPWLO's competition here
PPWLM vs ECIFF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ECIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECIFF's competition here
PPWLM vs ECIFY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ECIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECIFY's competition here
PPWLM vs RWEOY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while RWEOY trades at $61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check RWEOY's competition here
PPWLM vs RWNFF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while RWNFF trades at $61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and RWNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWNFF's competition here
PPWLM vs SSEZY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while SSEZY trades at $35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check SSEZY's competition here
PPWLM vs SSEZF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while SSEZF trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and SSEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSEZF's competition here
PPWLM vs EDPFY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while EDPFY trades at $51.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check EDPFY's competition here
PPWLM vs ELCPF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ELCPF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ELCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELCPF's competition here
PPWLM vs CHUEF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CHUEF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CHUEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHUEF's competition here
PPWLM vs AEMMY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while AEMMY trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and AEMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEMMY's competition here
PPWLM vs AEMMF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while AEMMF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and AEMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEMMF's competition here
PPWLM vs CDUAF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CDUAF trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CDUAF's competition here
PPWLM vs CDUUF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CDUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDUUF's competition here
PPWLM vs CUTLF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CUTLF trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CUTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUTLF's competition here
PPWLM vs HRASF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while HRASF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check HRASF's competition here
PPWLM vs CNAUF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CNAUF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CNAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNAUF's competition here
PPWLM vs ACLTF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ACLTF trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ACLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACLTF's competition here
PPWLM vs ACLLF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ACLLF trades at $47.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check ACLLF's competition here
PPWLM vs ACEJF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ACEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACEJF's competition here
PPWLM vs CDUTF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check CDUTF's competition here
PPWLM vs CSGEF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CSGEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CSGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGEF's competition here
PPWLM vs IRDEY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IRDEY trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check IRDEY's competition here
PPWLM vs IRDEF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while IRDEF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and IRDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRDEF's competition here
PPWLM vs CNUTF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CNUTF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CNUTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNUTF's competition here
PPWLM vs VETTF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while VETTF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPWLM.Check VETTF's competition here
PPWLM vs GLVNF Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and GLVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLVNF's competition here
PPWLM vs ARAO Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and ARAO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARAO's competition here
PPWLM vs PBEV Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and PBEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBEV's competition here
PPWLM vs CMNR Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and CMNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMNR's competition here
PPWLM vs EVNVY Comparison February 2026
PPWLM plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPWLM stands at 69B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPWLM is priced at $193.25, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPWLM currently has a P/E ratio of 81.27, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, PPWLM's ROE is +1.17%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPWLM and EVNVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVNVY's competition here