Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPL.TO | CA$66.85 | +1.56% | 38.9B | 25.12 | CA$2.66 | +4.30% |
| ENB-PFA.TO | CA$24.25 | +0.66% | 169.6B | 6.41 | CA$3.78 | +5.00% |
| ENB.TO | CA$76.70 | -0.03% | 167.5B | 28.41 | CA$2.70 | +5.00% |
| ENB-PN.TO | CA$25.19 | -0.51% | 166.7B | 25.70 | CA$0.98 | +5.00% |
| ENB-PT.TO | CA$24.90 | -0.16% | 156.2B | 25.41 | CA$0.98 | +5.00% |
| ENB-PA.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.00% | 145.5B | 25.51 | CA$0.98 | +5.00% |
| TRP-PD.TO | CA$25.08 | +0.04% | 102.8B | 6.32 | CA$3.97 | +3.66% |
| TRP.TO | CA$94.71 | +0.63% | 98.7B | 26.72 | CA$3.55 | +3.66% |
| PPL-PC.TO | CA$25.60 | +0.00% | 40.1B | 7.59 | CA$3.37 | +4.30% |
| PPL-PA.TO | CA$25.64 | +0.63% | 39.8B | 7.60 | CA$3.37 | +4.30% |
Stock Comparison
PPL.TO vs ENB-PFA.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ENB-PFA.TO has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while ENB-PFA.TO trades at CA$24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas ENB-PFA.TO's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PFA.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PFA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check ENB-PFA.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs ENB.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ENB.TO has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while ENB.TO trades at CA$76.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas ENB.TO's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check ENB.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs ENB-PN.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ENB-PN.TO has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while ENB-PN.TO trades at CA$25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas ENB-PN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check ENB-PN.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs ENB-PT.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ENB-PT.TO has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while ENB-PT.TO trades at CA$24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas ENB-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PT.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check ENB-PT.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs ENB-PA.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ENB-PA.TO has a market cap of 145.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while ENB-PA.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas ENB-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PA.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check ENB-PA.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs TRP-PD.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, TRP-PD.TO has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while TRP-PD.TO trades at CA$25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas TRP-PD.TO's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRP-PD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to TRP-PD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check TRP-PD.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs TRP.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, TRP.TO has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while TRP.TO trades at CA$94.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas TRP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to TRP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check TRP.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs PPL-PC.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, PPL-PC.TO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while PPL-PC.TO trades at CA$25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas PPL-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPL-PC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check PPL-PC.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs PPL-PA.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, PPL-PA.TO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while PPL-PA.TO trades at CA$25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas PPL-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPL-PA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check PPL-PA.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs ENB-PFK.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, ENB-PFK.TO has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while ENB-PFK.TO trades at CA$23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas ENB-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check ENB-PFK.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs PPL-PQ.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, PPL-PQ.TO has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while PPL-PQ.TO trades at CA$26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas PPL-PQ.TO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPL-PQ.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check PPL-PQ.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs KEY.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, KEY.TO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while KEY.TO trades at CA$56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas KEY.TO's P/E ratio is 71.86. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to KEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check KEY.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs SOBO.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, SOBO.TO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while SOBO.TO trades at CA$49.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas SOBO.TO's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOBO.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to SOBO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check SOBO.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs IPL.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, IPL.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while IPL.TO trades at CA$19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas IPL.TO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPL.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is less volatile compared to IPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check IPL.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs GEI.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, GEI.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while GEI.TO trades at CA$29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas GEI.TO's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEI.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to GEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check GEI.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs TPZ.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, TPZ.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while TPZ.TO trades at CA$30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas TPZ.TO's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPZ.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to TPZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check TPZ.TO's competition here
PPL.TO vs TWM.TO Comparison July 2026
PPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL.TO stands at 38.9B. In comparison, TWM.TO has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPL.TO is priced at CA$66.85, while TWM.TO trades at CA$16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.12, whereas TWM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, PPL.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWM.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL.TO is more volatile compared to TWM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL.TO.Check TWM.TO's competition here