Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPL-PA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPL-PA.TO | CA$24.99 | +0.08% | 38.8B | 10.90 | CA$2.29 | +4.48% |
| ENB.TO | CA$76.57 | +1.43% | 165.5B | 23.55 | CA$3.22 | +5.02% |
| ENB-PT.TO | CA$23.29 | -0.89% | 146.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.02% |
| ENB-PA.TO | CA$24.40 | +0.21% | 142.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.02% |
| TRP.TO | CA$88.34 | +0.12% | 91.8B | 25.40 | CA$3.47 | +3.86% |
| ENB-PN.TO | CA$24.37 | -0.41% | 53.2B | N/A | N/A | +5.02% |
| ENB-PFA.TO | CA$22.98 | -0.35% | 50B | 7.95 | CA$2.88 | +5.02% |
| ENB-PFK.TO | CA$22.40 | -0.97% | 41.7B | 18.00 | CA$1.40 | +5.02% |
| PPL-PC.TO | CA$24.80 | -0.04% | 38.8B | 10.82 | CA$2.29 | +4.48% |
| PPL.TO | CA$63.63 | +0.47% | 36.9B | 23.90 | CA$2.66 | +4.48% |
Stock Comparison
PPL-PA.TO vs ENB.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, ENB.TO has a market cap of 165.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while ENB.TO trades at CA$76.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas ENB.TO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ENB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check ENB.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs ENB-PT.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, ENB-PT.TO has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while ENB-PT.TO trades at CA$23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas ENB-PT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PT.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check ENB-PT.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs ENB-PA.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, ENB-PA.TO has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while ENB-PA.TO trades at CA$24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas ENB-PA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PA.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ENB-PA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check ENB-PA.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs TRP.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, TRP.TO has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while TRP.TO trades at CA$88.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas TRP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to TRP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check TRP.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs ENB-PN.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, ENB-PN.TO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while ENB-PN.TO trades at CA$24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas ENB-PN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PN.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ENB-PN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check ENB-PN.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs ENB-PFA.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, ENB-PFA.TO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while ENB-PFA.TO trades at CA$22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas ENB-PFA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PFA.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PFA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check ENB-PFA.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs ENB-PFK.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, ENB-PFK.TO has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while ENB-PFK.TO trades at CA$22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas ENB-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to ENB-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check ENB-PFK.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs PPL-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, PPL-PC.TO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while PPL-PC.TO trades at CA$24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas PPL-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPL-PC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check PPL-PC.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs PPL.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, PPL.TO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while PPL.TO trades at CA$63.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas PPL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPL.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to PPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check PPL.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs PPL-PQ.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, PPL-PQ.TO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while PPL-PQ.TO trades at CA$25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas PPL-PQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPL-PQ.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check PPL-PQ.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs TRP-PD.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, TRP-PD.TO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while TRP-PD.TO trades at CA$24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas TRP-PD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRP-PD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is more volatile compared to TRP-PD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check TRP-PD.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs KEY.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, KEY.TO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while KEY.TO trades at CA$54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas KEY.TO's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to KEY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check KEY.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs IPL.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, IPL.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while IPL.TO trades at CA$19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas IPL.TO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPL.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to IPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check IPL.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs GEI.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, GEI.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while GEI.TO trades at CA$29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas GEI.TO's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEI.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to GEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check GEI.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs TPZ.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, TPZ.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while TPZ.TO trades at CA$31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas TPZ.TO's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPZ.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to TPZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check TPZ.TO's competition here
PPL-PA.TO vs TWM.TO Comparison April 2026
PPL-PA.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPL-PA.TO stands at 38.8B. In comparison, TWM.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPL-PA.TO is priced at CA$24.99, while TWM.TO trades at CA$8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPL-PA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.90, whereas TWM.TO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, PPL-PA.TO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWM.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PPL-PA.TO is less volatile compared to TWM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPL-PA.TO.Check TWM.TO's competition here