PUMA SE
PUMA SE PMMAF Peers
See (PMMAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMMAF | $25.55 | -1.75% | 3.80B | 11.94 | $2.14 | +3.48% |
| ADDYY | $124.90 | -0.25% | 44.60B | 38.79 | $3.22 | +0.33% |
| ADDDF | $240.90 | -3.72% | 43.01B | 37.47 | $6.43 | +0.32% |
| ASCCY | $24.69 | +4.22% | 17.60B | 41.15 | $0.60 | +0.84% |
| ASCCF | $20.48 | N/A | 14.15B | 33.57 | $0.61 | +0.61% |
| BCUCF | $117.00 | +9.35% | 7.95B | 58.79 | $1.99 | +0.85% |
| PUMSY | $2.55 | -4.49% | 3.84B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.48% |
| YUEIF | $1.65 | -16.24% | 2.65B | 6.88 | $0.24 | +8.53% |
| SMSEY | $8.99 | -6.74% | 2.55B | 7.62 | $1.18 | +5.77% |
| SMSOF | $1.80 | -23.73% | 2.51B | 7.50 | $0.24 | +5.78% |
Stock Comparison
PMMAF vs ADDYY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ADDYY has a market cap of 44.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while ADDYY trades at $124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas ADDYY's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADDYY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to ADDYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs ADDDF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ADDDF has a market cap of 43.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while ADDDF trades at $240.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas ADDDF's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADDDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to ADDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs ASCCY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ASCCY has a market cap of 17.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while ASCCY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas ASCCY's P/E ratio is 41.15. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASCCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to ASCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs ASCCF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ASCCF has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while ASCCF trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas ASCCF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASCCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to ASCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs BCUCF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while BCUCF trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs PUMSY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, PUMSY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while PUMSY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas PUMSY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUMSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to PUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs YUEIF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, YUEIF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while YUEIF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas YUEIF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YUEIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to YUEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs SMSEY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, SMSEY has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while SMSEY trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas SMSEY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMSEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to SMSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs SMSOF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, SMSOF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while SMSOF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas SMSOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMSOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to SMSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs YUEIY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, YUEIY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while YUEIY trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas YUEIY's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YUEIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to YUEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs HUGPF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, HUGPF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while HUGPF trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas HUGPF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUGPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to HUGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs SLNLY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, SLNLY has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while SLNLY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas SLNLY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLNLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to SLNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs TODGF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, TODGF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while TODGF trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas TODGF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TODGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and TODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs FXWZF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, FXWZF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while FXWZF trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas FXWZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FXWZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and FXWZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs TSIOF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, TSIOF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while TSIOF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas TSIOF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to TSIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs DOCMF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, DOCMF has a market cap of 751.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while DOCMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas DOCMF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and DOCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs DRMTY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, DRMTY has a market cap of 694.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while DRMTY trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas DRMTY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRMTY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to DRMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs GXSBY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, GXSBY has a market cap of 183.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while GXSBY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas GXSBY's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GXSBY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and GXSBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs GXSBF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, GXSBF has a market cap of 155.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while GXSBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas GXSBF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GXSBF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to GXSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs TDPAY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, TDPAY has a market cap of 151.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while TDPAY trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas TDPAY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDPAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and TDPAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs MCRAB Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, MCRAB has a market cap of 109.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while MCRAB trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas MCRAB's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCRAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and MCRAB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs MCRAA Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, MCRAA has a market cap of 108.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while MCRAA trades at $46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas MCRAA's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCRAA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and MCRAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs DPNEY Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, DPNEY has a market cap of 92.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while DPNEY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas DPNEY's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DPNEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to DPNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs DPNEF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, DPNEF has a market cap of 39.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while DPNEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas DPNEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DPNEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to DPNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs KMSWF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, KMSWF has a market cap of 33.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while KMSWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas KMSWF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KMSWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to KMSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs BSHI Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, BSHI has a market cap of 31.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while BSHI trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas BSHI's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSHI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and BSHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs GVSI Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, GVSI has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while GVSI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas GVSI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GVSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to GVSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs TIEMF Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, TIEMF has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while TIEMF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas TIEMF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIEMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and TIEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs CHSH Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, CHSH has a market cap of 1.19M. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while CHSH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas CHSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHSH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and CHSH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
PMMAF vs RBNW Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, RBNW has a market cap of 939165.00. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while RBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas RBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBNW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to RBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs SAML Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, SAML has a market cap of 427462.00. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while SAML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas SAML's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAML's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to SAML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs ATYM Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, ATYM has a market cap of 265707.00. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while ATYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas ATYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATYM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to ATYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs PXFG Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, PXFG has a market cap of 81780.00. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while PXFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas PXFG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PXFG's ROE of -5.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF is less volatile compared to PXFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMMAF.
PMMAF vs QING Comparison
PMMAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMMAF stands at 3.80B. In comparison, QING has a market cap of 1212.00. Regarding current trading prices, PMMAF is priced at $25.55, while QING trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.94, whereas QING's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PMMAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QING's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PMMAF and QING have similar daily volatility (0.00).