Palfinger AG

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 154.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CAT trades at $323.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 130.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while DE trades at $481.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 63.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while DTRUY trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 55.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while VOLVF trades at $27.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and VOLVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 54.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while VLVLY trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 52.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while VOLAF trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and VOLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 46.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while PCAR trades at $89.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 31.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while DTGHF trades at $40.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 28.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KMTUF trades at $30.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and KMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 27.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KMTUY trades at $29.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 26.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while EPIAF trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while EPOKY trades at $22.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 22.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KIGRY trades at $10.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 20.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while OUKPY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while TRATF trades at $33.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CNH trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CNHI trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KUBTF trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ZLIOF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ZLIOY trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while SHKLY trades at $125.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while AGCO trades at $96.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and SHKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while HTCMY trades at $59.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while OSK trades at $89.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and HTCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KNCRY trades at $12.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KNNGF trades at $35.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KNCRF trades at $57.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while KUBTY trades at $58.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while TEX trades at $40.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while SNYYF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ALG trades at $174.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while REVG trades at $35.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while WKRCF trades at $26.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and WKRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while LNN trades at $132.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and PLFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while LONKF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 872.15M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ASTE trades at $38.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 200.74. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 703.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while HY trades at $39.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and FIRRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 445.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while AGGZF trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 439.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CMCO trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 438.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while TWI trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -86.12. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 338.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while WNC trades at $8.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 315.79M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while SHYF trades at $9.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 299.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while MTW trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and AUSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 188.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while GENC trades at $12.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 175.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 139.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while TGHLF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and TGHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while MNTX trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and MNTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while LEV trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and BIIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 33.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while FBRKF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 30.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while XOS trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XOS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 28.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 17.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while HYFM trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 16.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CLEV trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while NKLA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ZEV trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +86.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ARTW trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CUBXF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and CUBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 5.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CEAD trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 5.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while UGRO trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while GWPD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while AMMX trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and AMMX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 692997.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while AIFM trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 538082.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and WWTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460599.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while GRSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 386470.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CYLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42143.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while IDEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 32968.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while ZEVY trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11772.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CLGPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 10058.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while CEADW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and CEADW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while OSRS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and OSRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and BWOWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385.00. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while GRNH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and GRNH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, GRAZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF and GRAZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLFRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLFRF stands at 1.15B. In comparison, NAV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PLFRF is priced at $33.00, while NAV trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLFRF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.12, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, PLFRF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLFRF is less volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLFRF.