Komatsu Ltd.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KMTUF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KMTUF
Komatsu Ltd. (KMTUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMTUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMTUF | $41.76 | -7.45% | 38.1B | 14.76 | $2.83 | +2.66% |
| DTRUY | $26.05 | +0.39% | 80.7B | 19.44 | $1.34 | +4.16% |
| VOLVF | $35.41 | +6.70% | 73.8B | 19.56 | $1.81 | +4.15% |
| VOLAF | $36.10 | +0.00% | 73.4B | 19.20 | $1.88 | +4.07% |
| VLVLY | $35.02 | +0.03% | 70.8B | 19.24 | $1.81 | +2.71% |
| KMTUY | $44.63 | +2.46% | 40.6B | 15.76 | $2.83 | +2.86% |
| DTGHF | $51.08 | -0.42% | 39.1B | 18.78 | $2.72 | +4.22% |
| EPIAF | $27.17 | -0.33% | 32.9B | 35.75 | $0.76 | +1.39% |
| OUKPY | $9.71 | +1.15% | 32B | 28.44 | $0.34 | +1.46% |
| EPOAY | $27.90 | +0.76% | 31.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
KMTUF vs DTRUY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while DTRUY trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check DTRUY's competition here
KMTUF vs VOLVF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while VOLVF trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check VOLVF's competition here
KMTUF vs VOLAF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while VOLAF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check VOLAF's competition here
KMTUF vs VLVLY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while VLVLY trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check VLVLY's competition here
KMTUF vs KMTUY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KMTUY trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KMTUY's competition here
KMTUF vs DTGHF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while DTGHF trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check DTGHF's competition here
KMTUF vs EPIAF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while EPIAF trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPIAF's competition here
KMTUF vs OUKPY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while OUKPY trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check OUKPY's competition here
KMTUF vs EPOAY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, EPOAY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while EPOAY trades at $27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas EPOAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPOAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to EPOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPOAY's competition here
KMTUF vs EPOKY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPOKY's competition here
KMTUF vs EPIPF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while EPIPF trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPIPF's competition here
KMTUF vs KUBTY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KUBTY trades at $85.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KUBTY's competition here
KMTUF vs TRATF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while TRATF trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check TRATF's competition here
KMTUF vs KUBTF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KUBTF trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KUBTF's competition here
KMTUF vs OUKPF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while OUKPF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check OUKPF's competition here
KMTUF vs ZLIOF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while ZLIOF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check ZLIOF's competition here
KMTUF vs ZLIOY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while ZLIOY trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check ZLIOY's competition here
KMTUF vs SHKLF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while SHKLF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check SHKLF's competition here
KMTUF vs SHKLY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while SHKLY trades at $146.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check SHKLY's competition here
KMTUF vs HTCMY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while HTCMY trades at $75.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check HTCMY's competition here
KMTUF vs KNCRF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KNCRF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KNCRF's competition here
KMTUF vs KNNGF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KNNGF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KNNGF's competition here
KMTUF vs HTCMF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while HTCMF trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check HTCMF's competition here
KMTUF vs KNCRY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KNCRY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KNCRY's competition here
KMTUF vs KIGRY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while KIGRY trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KIGRY's competition here
KMTUF vs SNYYF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while SNYYF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check SNYYF's competition here
KMTUF vs FIRRF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while FIRRF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check FIRRF's competition here
KMTUF vs LKHLY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while LKHLY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check LKHLY's competition here
KMTUF vs LONKF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while LONKF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check LONKF's competition here
KMTUF vs WKRCF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while WKRCF trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check WKRCF's competition here
KMTUF vs PLFRF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while PLFRF trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check PLFRF's competition here
KMTUF vs PLFRY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check PLFRY's competition here
KMTUF vs FIRRY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while FIRRY trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check FIRRY's competition here
KMTUF vs QGLHF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while QGLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check QGLHF's competition here
KMTUF vs AGGZF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while AGGZF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AGGZF's competition here
KMTUF vs TGHLF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while TGHLF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check TGHLF's competition here
KMTUF vs AUSTF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while AUSTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AUSTF's competition here
KMTUF vs BIIAF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check BIIAF's competition here
KMTUF vs FBRKF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while FBRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check FBRKF's competition here
KMTUF vs PLPKF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while PLPKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check PLPKF's competition here
KMTUF vs GWPD Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while GWPD trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GWPD's competition here
KMTUF vs CLEV Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while CLEV trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -60.10. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CLEV's competition here
KMTUF vs CLGPF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while CLGPF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CLGPF's competition here
KMTUF vs AMMX Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while AMMX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMMX's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AMMX's competition here
KMTUF vs CUBXF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 956.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while CUBXF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CUBXF's competition here
KMTUF vs WWTIF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 892.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while WWTIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check WWTIF's competition here
KMTUF vs GRSO Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GRSO's competition here
KMTUF vs CYLC Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 162.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CYLC's competition here
KMTUF vs GRNH Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GRNH's competition here
KMTUF vs AIFM Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while AIFM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AIFM's competition here
KMTUF vs OSRS Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSRS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check OSRS's competition here
KMTUF vs ZEVY Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 659. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check ZEVY's competition here
KMTUF vs BWOWF Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 85. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check BWOWF's competition here
KMTUF vs GRAZ Comparison April 2026
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 38.1B. In comparison, GRAZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $41.76, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GRAZ's competition here