Playground Ventures Inc.

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, BRAG.TO has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while BRAG.TO trades at CA$6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BRAG.TO's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRAG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN is less volatile compared to BRAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLAY.CN.

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, GMNG.CN has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while GMNG.CN trades at CA$0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GMNG.CN's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMNG.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN is less volatile compared to GMNG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLAY.CN.

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, EAGR.TO has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while EAGR.TO trades at CA$0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas EAGR.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EAGR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN is less volatile compared to EAGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLAY.CN.

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, VST.CN has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while VST.CN trades at CA$0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VST.CN's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VST.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN is less volatile compared to VST.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLAY.CN.

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, VRTS.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while VRTS.TO trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VRTS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRTS.TO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN and VRTS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, BETS.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while BETS.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BETS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BETS.CN's ROE of -79.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN and BETS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, SWRM.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while SWRM.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SWRM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWRM.CN's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN is less volatile compared to SWRM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLAY.CN.

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, GET.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while GET.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GET.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GET.CN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN and GET.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, EPY.CN has a market cap of 989.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while EPY.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas EPY.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPY.CN's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN and EPY.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, TIDL.CN has a market cap of 152.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while TIDL.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas TIDL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIDL.CN's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN and TIDL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

PLAY.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLAY.CN stands at 3M. In comparison, ALPA.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLAY.CN is priced at CA$0.04, while ALPA.CN trades at CA$0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLAY.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALPA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, PLAY.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALPA.CN's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLAY.CN and ALPA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).