Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. PK Peers
See (PK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PK | $10.27 | +2.45% | 2.1B | 17.40 | $0.59 | +13.59% |
| HST | $15.76 | +2.54% | 10.9B | 16.42 | $0.96 | +5.71% |
| RHP | $96.76 | +0.85% | 6.1B | 20.54 | $4.71 | +4.64% |
| DRH-PA | $25.19 | -0.28% | 5.2B | -226.94 | -$0.11 | +4.85% |
| SHO-PH | $20.50 | +0.81% | 4.1B | 55.41 | $0.37 | +4.10% |
| SHO-PI | $19.15 | -1.64% | 3.8B | 51.76 | $0.37 | +4.10% |
| APLE | $11.76 | +1.60% | 2.8B | 14.69 | $0.80 | +8.61% |
| PEB-PG | $18.34 | -2.01% | 2.2B | -10.98 | -$1.67 | +0.42% |
| INN-PF | $18.15 | +0.68% | 2B | -31.14 | -$0.58 | +7.43% |
| PEB-PH | $16.17 | +0.40% | 1.9B | -9.68 | -$1.67 | +0.42% |
Stock Comparison
PK vs HST Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while HST trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs RHP Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while RHP trades at $96.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs DRH-PA Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while DRH-PA trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -226.94. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SHO-PH Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SHO-PH trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 55.41. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SHO-PI Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SHO-PI trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs APLE Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while APLE trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs PEB-PG Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while PEB-PG trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs INN-PF Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while INN-PF trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -31.14. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to INN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs PEB-PH Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while PEB-PH trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SHO Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SHO trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 87.65. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs DRH Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while DRH trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs XHR Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while XHR trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 55.41. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs PEB Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while PEB trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -21.84. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs RLJ Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while RLJ trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs RLJ-PA Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs PEB-PE Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while PEB-PE trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs PEB-PF Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while PEB-PF trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs CLDT-PA Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CLDT-PA has a market cap of 994.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while CLDT-PA trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas CLDT-PA's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLDT-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to CLDT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs HT-PE Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs HT-PD Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs HT-PC Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs INN-PE Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 555.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while INN-PE trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs HT Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs INN Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 482M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while INN trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas INN's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SVC Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 391.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SVC trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs CLDT Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while CLDT trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 119.25. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs BHR-PB Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while BHR-PB trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -45.78. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs BHR Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while BHR trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs BHR-PD Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while BHR-PD trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -69.09. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SOHOB Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SOHOB trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs AHT-PG Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while AHT-PG trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs AHT Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while AHT trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHT's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs AHT-PI Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while AHT-PI trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SOHOO Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SOHOO trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs AHT-PF Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while AHT-PF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SOHON Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SOHON trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOHON's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs AHT-PH Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while AHT-PH trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs AHT-PD Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while AHT-PD trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs IHT Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while IHT trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs SOHO Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while SOHO trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOHO's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is less volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs CDOR Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs PEB-PD Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.
PK vs CPLG Comparison
PK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PK stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PK is priced at $10.27, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.40, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, PK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PK is more volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PK.