Chatham Lodging Trust
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLDT-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDT-PA | $19.99 | +0.65% | 972M | -26.63 | -$0.75 | +4.31% |
| HST | $20.90 | -0.81% | 14.4B | 19.01 | $1.10 | +4.55% |
| RHP | $102.21 | +1.61% | 6.5B | 27.12 | $3.77 | +4.61% |
| DRH-PA | $24.99 | +0.04% | 5.1B | -225.14 | -$0.11 | +4.02% |
| SHO-PH | $21.06 | +0.29% | 4B | 56.92 | $0.37 | +3.76% |
| SHO-PI | $20.50 | +0.44% | 3.9B | 55.39 | $0.37 | +3.76% |
| RLJ-PA | $24.83 | +0.24% | 3.8B | -15.26 | -$1.63 | +7.55% |
| APLE | $13.19 | +0.38% | 3.1B | 17.82 | $0.74 | +7.30% |
| PEB-PG | $20.15 | +0.85% | 2.3B | -12.02 | -$1.67 | +0.29% |
| PK | $11.20 | +1.17% | 2.3B | -7.83 | -$1.43 | +8.96% |
Stock Comparison
CLDT-PA vs HST Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while HST trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HST's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RHP Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while RHP trades at $102.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RHP's competition here
CLDT-PA vs DRH-PA Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while DRH-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -225.14. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check DRH-PA's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO-PH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SHO-PH trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO-PI Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SHO-PI trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO-PI's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RLJ-PA Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RLJ-PA's competition here
CLDT-PA vs APLE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while APLE trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check APLE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PG Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PEB-PG trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PK Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PK trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PK's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PK's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PEB-PH trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs DRH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while DRH trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check DRH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN-PE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while INN-PE trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -31.73. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SHO trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 241.00. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PEB trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs XHR Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while XHR trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check XHR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RLJ Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while RLJ trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 796.00. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RLJ's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PEB-PE trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and PEB-PE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEB-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PF Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PEB-PF trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and PEB-PF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEB-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PC Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while INN trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas INN's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CLDT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while CLDT trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CLDT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHOO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SOHOO trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHOO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN-PF Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 333.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while INN-PF trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -30.48. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHOB Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SOHOB trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and SOHOB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHOB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHON Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SOHON trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHON's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHON's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SVC Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 255.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SVC trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SVC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR-PB Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while BHR-PB trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -51.05. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR-PB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while BHR trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while BHR-PD trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -55.41. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while SOHO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and SOHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while AHT-PD trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PI Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while AHT-PI trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and AHT-PI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AHT-PI's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PF Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while AHT-PF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while AHT-PH trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PG Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while AHT-PG trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while AHT trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs IHT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while IHT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check IHT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs LHO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, LHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while LHO trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas LHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LHO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to LHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check LHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs FCH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, FCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while FCH trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas FCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to FCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check FCH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CDOR Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CDOR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs MHGC Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, MHGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while MHGC trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas MHGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MHGC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to MHGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check MHGC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CPLG Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 972M. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.99, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.63, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CPLG's competition here