Sprott Physical Gold Trust
Sprott Physical Gold Trust PHYS.TO Peers
See (PHYS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHYS.TO | CA$34.98 | -1.66% | 16.2B | 3.71 | CA$9.43 | N/A |
| BLK.NE | CA$26.28 | +2.22% | 209.5B | 23.89 | CA$1.10 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$84.22 | +2.88% | 138.8B | 205.41 | CA$0.41 | +0.77% |
| BAM.TO | CA$76.47 | +3.07% | 123.3B | 41.34 | CA$1.85 | +2.17% |
| VFV.TO | CA$148.68 | +1.07% | 21B | 26.05 | CA$5.71 | +1.03% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$91.64 | +1.07% | 18B | N/A | N/A | +0.93% |
| XIU.TO | CA$40.24 | +0.55% | 14.2B | 21.81 | CA$1.85 | +3.05% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.73 | +1.06% | 11.4B | 16.79 | CA$2.55 | +2.44% |
| VUN.TO | CA$111.83 | +1.17% | 10.8B | 25.28 | CA$4.42 | +0.95% |
| IGM.TO | CA$43.35 | +0.42% | 10.2B | 10.92 | CA$3.97 | +5.18% |
Stock Comparison
PHYS.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 209.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while BLK.NE trades at CA$26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while BN.TO trades at CA$84.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 205.41. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while BAM.TO trades at CA$76.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VFV.TO trades at CA$148.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$91.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XIU.TO trades at CA$40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VUN.TO trades at CA$111.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while IGM.TO trades at CA$43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XIC.TO trades at CA$42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XSP.TO trades at CA$62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VCN.TO trades at CA$54.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XUS.TO trades at CA$52.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CEF.TO trades at CA$41.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$110.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$47.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VIU.TO trades at CA$38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$53.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.08. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VSP.TO trades at CA$97.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while HXS.TO trades at CA$86.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while HXT.TO trades at CA$70.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while QUU.TO trades at CA$241.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XUU.TO trades at CA$61.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VDY.TO trades at CA$51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while TPU.TO trades at CA$47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$83.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$55.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while TTP.TO trades at CA$30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XAW.TO trades at CA$46.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while TPE.TO trades at CA$24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VEE.TO trades at CA$40.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VXC.TO trades at CA$66.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs SII.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while SII.TO trades at CA$88.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XEC.TO trades at CA$31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VCE.TO trades at CA$58.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$153.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VGG.TO trades at CA$94.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while QCN.TO trades at CA$162.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XEI.TO trades at CA$28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XFN.TO trades at CA$64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while QQC.TO trades at CA$36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CYB.TO trades at CA$79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while UNC.TO trades at CA$135.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while EQL.TO trades at CA$37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$86.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while HHL.TO trades at CA$7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while MUB.TO trades at CA$18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XWD.TO trades at CA$98.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XRE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while XRE.TO trades at CA$15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs EVT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.2B. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$34.98, while EVT.TO trades at CA$19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.71, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.