Sprott Physical Gold Trust
Sprott Physical Gold Trust PHYS.TO Peers
See (PHYS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHYS.TO | CA$35.82 | +1.79% | 16.5B | 3.78 | CA$9.43 | N/A |
| BLK.NE | CA$28.61 | -0.90% | 228.2B | 26.03 | CA$1.10 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$90.45 | -2.02% | 149.6B | 226.93 | CA$0.40 | +0.64% |
| BAM.TO | CA$82.54 | -1.03% | 132.8B | 44.28 | CA$1.86 | +2.76% |
| VFV.TO | CA$152.37 | -0.61% | 21.6B | 26.82 | CA$5.71 | +0.99% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$93.98 | -0.59% | 18.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.12% |
| XIU.TO | CA$41.24 | +0.19% | 14.5B | 22.29 | CA$1.85 | +3.37% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.44 | +0.31% | 11.3B | 16.68 | CA$2.55 | +2.63% |
| VUN.TO | CA$114.64 | -0.57% | 11.1B | 26.01 | CA$4.42 | +0.92% |
| IGM.TO | CA$44.71 | +2.08% | 10.4B | 11.12 | CA$3.97 | +5.08% |
Stock Comparison
PHYS.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 228.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while BLK.NE trades at CA$28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while BN.TO trades at CA$90.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 226.93. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while BAM.TO trades at CA$82.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VFV.TO trades at CA$152.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$93.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XIU.TO trades at CA$41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VUN.TO trades at CA$114.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while IGM.TO trades at CA$44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XIC.TO trades at CA$43.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XSP.TO trades at CA$64.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VCN.TO trades at CA$55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XUS.TO trades at CA$53.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CEF.TO trades at CA$43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$112.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$48.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VIU.TO trades at CA$38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VSP.TO trades at CA$100.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while HXS.TO trades at CA$88.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while QUU.TO trades at CA$248.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while HXT.TO trades at CA$71.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XUU.TO trades at CA$63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VDY.TO trades at CA$52.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while TPU.TO trades at CA$48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$86.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while TTP.TO trades at CA$31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO and TTP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.45).
PHYS.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XAW.TO trades at CA$46.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$42.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while TPE.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs SII.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while SII.TO trades at CA$98.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XBB.TO trades at CA$27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XEC.TO trades at CA$32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VEE.TO trades at CA$41.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VXC.TO trades at CA$67.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VCE.TO trades at CA$59.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$159.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$55.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 66.93. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VGG.TO trades at CA$95.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while QCN.TO trades at CA$166.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XFN.TO trades at CA$66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XEI.TO trades at CA$29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while QQC.TO trades at CA$37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CYB.TO trades at CA$82.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CACB.TO trades at CA$19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while EQL.TO trades at CA$38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$88.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XRE.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XRE.TO trades at CA$16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while XWD.TO trades at CA$100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs GCG.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, GCG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while GCG.TO trades at CA$44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas GCG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GCG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to GCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while MUB.TO trades at CA$18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs ZNQ.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, ZNQ.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while ZNQ.TO trades at CA$101.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas ZNQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZNQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is less volatile compared to ZNQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while VUS.TO trades at CA$108.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.
PHYS.TO vs EVT.TO Comparison
PHYS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHYS.TO stands at 16.5B. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHYS.TO is priced at CA$35.82, while EVT.TO trades at CA$20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHYS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.78, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, PHYS.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHYS.TO is more volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHYS.TO.