GrowLife, Inc.
GrowLife, Inc. PHOT Peers
See (PHOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHOT | $0.00 | +0.00% | 11.1K | N/A | -$1.85 | N/A |
| IDDWF | $28.48 | N/A | 10.4B | 35.60 | $0.80 | +1.06% |
| REECF | $14.00 | -12.50% | 9B | 37.84 | $0.37 | +1.04% |
| ADRZY | $14.08 | -1.19% | 6.9B | 12.80 | $1.10 | +3.86% |
| TMTNF | $83.10 | N/A | 6.8B | 19.10 | $4.35 | +1.69% |
| ADRZF | $69.15 | N/A | 6.7B | 12.57 | $5.50 | +3.57% |
| FINGF | $36.37 | N/A | 4.9B | 14.21 | $2.56 | +2.24% |
| EENEF | $7.53 | N/A | 3.6B | 17.11 | $0.44 | +3.73% |
| GROUF | $11.00 | N/A | 2.2B | 11.70 | $0.94 | +6.02% |
| RUSMF | $29.95 | N/A | 1.7B | 15.60 | $1.92 | +4.04% |
Stock Comparison
PHOT vs IDDWF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, IDDWF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while IDDWF trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDDWF's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to IDDWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to IDDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs REECF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while REECF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs ADRZY Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while ADRZY trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs TMTNF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while TMTNF trades at $83.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs ADRZF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while ADRZF trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs FINGF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while FINGF trades at $36.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs EENEF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while EENEF trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs GROUF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while GROUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to GROUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs RUSMF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while RUSMF trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to RUSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs HDIUF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while HDIUF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to HDIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs WJXFF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while WJXFF trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs PRKCF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to PRKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs KHDHF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while KHDHF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs HPURF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while HPURF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs CVTYF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to CVTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs EMPS Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to EMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs TXHG Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TXHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs VVWT Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 534.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while VVWT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs GYOG Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to GYOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs WARM Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 86.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to WARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs CDIIQ Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs MJHI Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to MJHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs UMAM Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while UMAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to UMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs ORGH Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while ORGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs VALV Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while VALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to VALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs SLUP Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs PUDA Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is less volatile compared to PUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs CGDI Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to CGDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs HESV Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to HESV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs ZAHA Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is more volatile compared to ZAHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.
PHOT vs WPMLF Comparison
PHOT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHOT stands at 11.1K. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHOT is priced at $0.00, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHOT's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHOT is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHOT.