PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc.
PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. PHLI Peers
See (PHLI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHLI | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 438307.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LRLCY | $86.20 | -1.91% | 230.29B | 31.93 | $2.70 | +1.39% |
| LRLCF | $427.40 | -4.26% | 228.37B | 31.59 | $13.53 | +1.85% |
| UNLYF | $62.98 | +5.05% | 157.51B | 24.32 | $2.59 | +3.02% |
| RBGPF | $63.81 | N/A | 43.49B | 23.55 | $2.71 | +4.09% |
| RBGLY | $12.75 | -0.47% | 43.45B | 23.61 | $0.54 | +4.10% |
| HELKF | $72.01 | -3.95% | 31.53B | 13.31 | $5.41 | +2.85% |
| HENOY | $19.76 | +1.13% | 31.42B | 14.64 | $1.35 | +2.23% |
| HENKY | $17.75 | +0.06% | 30.99B | 13.15 | $1.35 | +2.45% |
| BDRFF | $138.46 | +11.12% | 30.91B | 30.23 | $4.58 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
PHLI vs LRLCY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 230.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while LRLCY trades at $86.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs LRLCF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 228.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while LRLCF trades at $427.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs UNLYF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 157.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while UNLYF trades at $62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs RBGPF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 43.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while RBGPF trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs RBGLY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 43.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while RBGLY trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HELKF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 31.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HELKF trades at $72.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HENOY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 31.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HENOY trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HENKY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 30.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HENKY trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BDRFF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 30.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BDRFF trades at $138.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HENOF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 30.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HENOF trades at $77.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BDRFY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 29.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BDRFY trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KAOCF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 21.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KAOCF trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KAOOY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 20.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KAOOY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs ETTYF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 19.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while ETTYF trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs UNICY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 14.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while UNICY trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs UNCHF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 13.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while UNCHF trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SSDOY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SSDOY trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -87.74. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs LCCTF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SSDOF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SSDOF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -78.95. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KCDMF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KCDMF trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs LIOPY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while LIOPY trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KCDMY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KCDMY trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BICEY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BICEY trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs RPHCF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while RPHCF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs UNLRY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while UNLRY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs NTCOY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs UNLRF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while UNLRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs VDAHF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HEGIY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HEGIY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HEGIF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HEGIF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs VDAHY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KBYPF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BICEF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BICEF trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KOSCF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs LIOPF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs FACYF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while FACYF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KSRYY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KSRYY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PORBF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PORBF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs MIOFF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BLUMY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BLUMY trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs ONXYY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while ONXYY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PGENY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PGENY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PIGEF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs OLVI Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while OLVI trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SRTSF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 890.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs DUNIY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.83M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs ONXXF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 671.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while ONXXF trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs MDOMF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs WPNTF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs YAMNF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PZCUY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 445.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs MCBRF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 329.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while MCBRF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs UNHLF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 196.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while UNHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KITAF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 130.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KITAF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs NBBTF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 116.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while NBBTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs RVIV Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while RVIV trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KPTSF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 60.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KPTSF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PRFUF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 26.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PRFUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs DQWS Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 18.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while DQWS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to DQWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SNBH Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SNBH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs MIMNF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PURE Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 6.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PURE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PURE's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs CAWW Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 6.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while CAWW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs ZOONF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs MAVBF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs FDOGF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs REVRQ Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs NUVI Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 3.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while NUVI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SPCO Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SPCO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SKVI Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SKVI trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs ZRVT Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while ZRVT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is less volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs CLGOF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while CLGOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SLGD Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812885.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SLGD trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SLGD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs WNBD Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 699997.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while WNBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs NASO Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 688514.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while NASO trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PYCT Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 553705.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PYCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs TVOG Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 423590.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while TVOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs HRSR Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185621.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HRSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs EESO Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72920.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while EESO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs EOSS Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60478.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while EOSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs QNTA Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40659.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while QNTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SYHO Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39592.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SYHO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs GRBG Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 38971.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while GRBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BRSHF Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 37504.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs JOEY Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28244.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while JOEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SNST Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26592.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SNST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs INBI Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18146.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while INBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI and INBI have similar daily volatility (196.04).
PHLI vs HPTN Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17808.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while HPTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs GYSN Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 13983.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while GYSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs KPOC Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13743.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while KPOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs NUUU Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11776.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while NUUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NUUU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs EMPO Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6279.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while EMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to EMPO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs BEUT Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3192.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while BEUT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs NCDP Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1848.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while NCDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs MDAV Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1424.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while MDAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs PCGR Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while PCGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs RBCL Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while RBCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.
PHLI vs SOYO Comparison
PHLI plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PHLI stands at 438307.00. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62.00. Regarding current trading prices, PHLI is priced at $0.00, while SOYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PHLI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PHLI's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHLI is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHLI.