PGG Wrightson Limited

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while BMBLF trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check BMBLF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while BXBLY trades at $35.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check BXBLY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while WOLTF trades at $71.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check WOLTF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while WTKWY trades at $73.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check WTKWY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while RKLIF trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check RKLIF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while IKTSY trades at $62.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check IKTSY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while IKTSF trades at $62.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check IKTSF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while TOPPY trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check TOPPY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DNPLY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DNPLY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while INPOF trades at $18.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to INPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check INPOF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while INPOY trades at $8.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check INPOY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DNPCF trades at $18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DNPCF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SDXOF trades at $55.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SDXOF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SDXAY trades at $11.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SDXAY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while TONPF trades at $28.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check TONPF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ELSSF trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ELSSF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CTAGY trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CTAGY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ISFFF trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ISFFF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SCGPY trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SCGPY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while TLPFF trades at $58.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check TLPFF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SECCF trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 50.57. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SECCF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while TLPFY trades at $29.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check TLPFY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while MITFY trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check MITFY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while MITFF trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check MITFF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ACENY trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACENY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ACENY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while APLUF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APLUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check APLUF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while RELOF trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check RELOF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ISSDY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while TCLAF trades at $17.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to TCLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check TCLAF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while TCLCF trades at $12.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to TCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check TCLCF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 979.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DLUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DLUEY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while STGXF trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to STGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check STGXF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 683.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to JSVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check JSVGF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while IRMTF trades at $34.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check IRMTF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 635.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CLNFF trades at $55.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CLNFF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 625.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while GDIFF trades at $26.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to GDIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check GDIFF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 588.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while HZNOF trades at $9.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check HZNOF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while IPHLF trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check IPHLF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check GLCDF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 524.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while RKSLF trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check RKSLF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ITEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ITEPF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CTAGF trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CTAGF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while KBRLF trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check KBRLF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DELRF trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DELRF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while VSSPY trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check VSSPY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ITEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ITEGY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while KPGHF trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check KPGHF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check PCRRF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 151.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CTGL trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CTGL's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CERGF trades at $4.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CERGF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while AJISF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check AJISF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PGWFF has daily volatility of 74.66 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.Check PCOA's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while FLNCF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check FLNCF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check RDCPF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while WTLLF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check WTLLF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DCMDF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DCMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DCMDF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SRRPF trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SRRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SRRPF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ASFH trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASFH's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ASFH's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ESTTF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to UWHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check UWHGF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CRKT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CRKT's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to FTBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check FTBGF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SFRX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SFRX's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to GNOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check GNOLF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while NSYC trades at $378.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSYC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check NSYC's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, RLFTY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while RLFTY trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas RLFTY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RLFTY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to RLFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check RLFTY's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ELVG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELVG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ELVG's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while REPO trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check REPO's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while GPOX trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check GPOX's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ADMQ trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ADMQ's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while AWAW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check AWAW's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while LMTI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check LMTI's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CGRW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CGRW's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while OODH trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check OODH's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ANMP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANMP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ANMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ANMP's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SAYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SAYFF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while UNDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to UNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check UNDR's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 607.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while HHGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHGI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to HHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check HHGI's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 489.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while JFIL trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check JFIL's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 393.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while MTPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check MTPR's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DTSL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DTSL's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 360.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check WLDPF's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while XCPL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XCPL's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check XCPL's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 274.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while ECOX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECOX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to ECOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check ECOX's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 249.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while DPUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to DPUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check DPUI's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 221.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while IJJP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to IJJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check IJJP's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while OPMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPMG's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check OPMG's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while IMJX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check IMJX's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while INCC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check INCC's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 103.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while PIFR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check PIFR's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while NNFC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNFC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check NNFC's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while UCPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check UCPC's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PPMT has a market cap of 54.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while PPMT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas PPMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPMT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to PPMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check PPMT's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while GFGU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check GFGU's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while BFLD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check BFLD's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 43.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check CBMJ's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while SGLS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGLS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check SGLS's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OPUS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while OPUS trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas OPUS's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPUS's ROE of +12.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to OPUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check OPUS's competition here

PGWFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGWFF stands at 190.2M. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PGWFF is priced at $2.52, while AXCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGWFF currently has a P/E ratio of 126.00, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGWFF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXCG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PGWFF is more volatile compared to AXCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGWFF.Check AXCG's competition here