Powergrid Infrastructure Invesment Trust
Powergrid Infrastructure Invesment Trust (PGINVIT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PGINVIT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGINVIT.NS | ₹94.36 | +0.44% | 85.9B | 6.35 | ₹14.86 | N/A |
| NTPC.NS | ₹395.25 | -0.26% | 3.8T | 21.87 | ₹18.07 | +2.24% |
| NTPC.BO | ₹394.95 | -0.33% | 3.8T | 21.86 | ₹18.07 | +2.24% |
| POWERGRID.NS | ₹305.85 | +1.36% | 2.8T | 19.64 | ₹15.57 | +2.94% |
| POWERGRID.BO | ₹305.85 | +1.34% | 2.8T | 19.64 | ₹15.57 | +2.94% |
| NLCINDIA.BO | ₹353.15 | -4.85% | 489.7B | 19.38 | ₹18.22 | +1.45% |
| NLCINDIA.NS | ₹352.80 | -4.88% | 489.2B | 19.37 | ₹18.21 | +1.45% |
| CESC.NS | ₹180.09 | -2.37% | 238.7B | 15.50 | ₹11.62 | +3.33% |
| CESC.BO | ₹180.05 | -2.36% | 238.7B | 16.46 | ₹10.94 | +3.33% |
| PGINVIT-IV.NS | ₹94.36 | +0.44% | 85.9B | N/A | N/A | +12.72% |
Stock Comparison
PGINVIT.NS vs NTPC.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, NTPC.NS has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while NTPC.NS trades at ₹395.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas NTPC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTPC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to NTPC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check NTPC.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs NTPC.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, NTPC.BO has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while NTPC.BO trades at ₹394.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas NTPC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTPC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to NTPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check NTPC.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs POWERGRID.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, POWERGRID.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while POWERGRID.NS trades at ₹305.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas POWERGRID.NS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to POWERGRID.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to POWERGRID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check POWERGRID.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs POWERGRID.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, POWERGRID.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while POWERGRID.BO trades at ₹305.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas POWERGRID.BO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to POWERGRID.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to POWERGRID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check POWERGRID.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs NLCINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, NLCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 489.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while NLCINDIA.BO trades at ₹353.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas NLCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NLCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to NLCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check NLCINDIA.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs NLCINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, NLCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 489.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while NLCINDIA.NS trades at ₹352.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas NLCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NLCINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to NLCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check NLCINDIA.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs CESC.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, CESC.NS has a market cap of 238.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while CESC.NS trades at ₹180.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas CESC.NS's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CESC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to CESC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check CESC.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs CESC.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, CESC.BO has a market cap of 238.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while CESC.BO trades at ₹180.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas CESC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CESC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to CESC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check CESC.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs PGINVIT-IV.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, PGINVIT-IV.NS has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while PGINVIT-IV.NS trades at ₹94.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas PGINVIT-IV.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PGINVIT-IV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS and PGINVIT-IV.NS have similar daily volatility (0.93).Check PGINVIT-IV.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs RELINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, RELINFRA.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while RELINFRA.BO trades at ₹71.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas RELINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RELINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is more volatile compared to RELINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check RELINFRA.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs RELINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, RELINFRA.NS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while RELINFRA.NS trades at ₹71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas RELINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RELINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is more volatile compared to RELINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check RELINFRA.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs GIPCL.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, GIPCL.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while GIPCL.BO trades at ₹146.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas GIPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GIPCL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to GIPCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check GIPCL.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs GIPCL.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, GIPCL.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while GIPCL.NS trades at ₹146.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas GIPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GIPCL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to GIPCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check GIPCL.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs BAJEL.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, BAJEL.BO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while BAJEL.BO trades at ₹176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas BAJEL.BO's P/E ratio is 184.11. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAJEL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to BAJEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check BAJEL.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs BAJEL.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, BAJEL.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while BAJEL.NS trades at ₹176.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas BAJEL.NS's P/E ratio is 185.97. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAJEL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to BAJEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check BAJEL.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs DPSCLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, DPSCLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while DPSCLTD.NS trades at ₹9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas DPSCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 330.33. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DPSCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to DPSCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check DPSCLTD.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs EKI.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, EKI.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while EKI.BO trades at ₹82.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas EKI.BO's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EKI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to EKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check EKI.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs MADHAVIPL.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, MADHAVIPL.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while MADHAVIPL.BO trades at ₹8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas MADHAVIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MADHAVIPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to MADHAVIPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check MADHAVIPL.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs ENERGYDEV.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, ENERGYDEV.BO has a market cap of 793.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while ENERGYDEV.BO trades at ₹16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas ENERGYDEV.BO's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ENERGYDEV.BO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to ENERGYDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check ENERGYDEV.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs ENERGYDEV.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, ENERGYDEV.NS has a market cap of 788M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while ENERGYDEV.NS trades at ₹16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas ENERGYDEV.NS's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ENERGYDEV.NS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to ENERGYDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check ENERGYDEV.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs WAA.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, WAA.BO has a market cap of 771.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while WAA.BO trades at ₹58.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas WAA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to WAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check WAA.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs AGNI.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, AGNI.NS has a market cap of 413.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while AGNI.NS trades at ₹21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas AGNI.NS's P/E ratio is 96.14. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to AGNI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check AGNI.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs GITARENEW.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, GITARENEW.BO has a market cap of 329.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while GITARENEW.BO trades at ₹80.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas GITARENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -143.18. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GITARENEW.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to GITARENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check GITARENEW.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs KSK.NS Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, KSK.NS has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while KSK.NS trades at ₹0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas KSK.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSK.NS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to KSK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check KSK.NS's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs SRMENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, SRMENERGY.BO has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while SRMENERGY.BO trades at ₹17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas SRMENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SRMENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is less volatile compared to SRMENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check SRMENERGY.BO's competition here
PGINVIT.NS vs ANANDPROJ.BO Comparison May 2026
PGINVIT.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PGINVIT.NS stands at 85.9B. In comparison, ANANDPROJ.BO has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGINVIT.NS is priced at ₹94.36, while ANANDPROJ.BO trades at ₹23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PGINVIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.35, whereas ANANDPROJ.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGINVIT.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ANANDPROJ.BO's ROE of -8.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PGINVIT.NS is more volatile compared to ANANDPROJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGINVIT.NS.Check ANANDPROJ.BO's competition here