PFB Corporation
PFB Corporation (PFB.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PFB.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFB.TO | CA$24.10 | +0.17% | 0 | 11.02 | CA$2.19 | N/A |
| TFPM.TO | CA$31.62 | -0.66% | 6.5B | 790.50 | CA$0.04 | +0.96% |
| CGG.TO | CA$11.98 | +0.76% | 4.7B | 19.97 | CA$0.60 | +0.93% |
| PPTA.TO | CA$20.95 | +1.35% | 2.3B | -52.37 | -CA$0.40 | N/A |
| SIL.TO | CA$15.01 | -8.64% | 2.2B | 18.30 | CA$0.82 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | CA$7.02 | -3.04% | 2B | -20.68 | -CA$0.34 | N/A |
| GMIN.TO | CA$16.24 | -0.12% | 1.7B | 22.87 | CA$0.71 | N/A |
| ARIS.TO | CA$9.65 | +1.58% | 1.7B | 43.86 | CA$0.22 | N/A |
| GATO.TO | CA$21.59 | +5.73% | 1.5B | 32.22 | CA$0.67 | N/A |
| SLS.TO | CA$6.75 | +4.17% | 1.1B | -9.64 | -CA$0.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PFB.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while TFPM.TO trades at CA$31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 790.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check TFPM.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CGG.TO trades at CA$11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CGG.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while PPTA.TO trades at CA$20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -52.37. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check PPTA.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs SIL.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SIL.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while SIL.TO trades at CA$15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas SIL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIL.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to SIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check SIL.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while EDR.TO trades at CA$7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check EDR.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while GMIN.TO trades at CA$16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check GMIN.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ARIS.TO trades at CA$9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ARIS.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while GATO.TO trades at CA$21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check GATO.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs SLS.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SLS.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while SLS.TO trades at CA$6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas SLS.TO's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLS.TO's ROE of +20.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to SLS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check SLS.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 802.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ABRA.TO trades at CA$5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -20.23. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ABRA.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 757.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while MUX.TO trades at CA$14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check MUX.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 689.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while GGD.TO trades at CA$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 202.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check GGD.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs ASM.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ASM.TO has a market cap of 641.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ASM.TO trades at CA$4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ASM.TO's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ASM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ASM.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 346.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while NUAG.TO trades at CA$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check NUAG.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ALLI.NE trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ALLI.NE's competition here
PFB.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while PTM.TO trades at CA$2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -41.20. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check PTM.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while HSLV.CN trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check HSLV.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while VOXR.TO trades at CA$4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is -87.40. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check VOXR.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while XAM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check XAM.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while LUC.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check LUC.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs SM.V Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while SM.V trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SM.V's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check SM.V's competition here
PFB.TO vs ORV.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ORV.TO has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ORV.TO trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ORV.TO's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ORV.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ORV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ORV.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ESAU.CN trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ESAU.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ELR.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ELR.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CUAU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CUAU.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while DMET.NE trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check DMET.NE's competition here
PFB.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while EMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check EMPS.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while AUCU.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check AUCU.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while DIAM.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to DIAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check DIAM.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs ITKO.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ITKO.CN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ITKO.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ITKO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITKO.CN's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to ITKO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ITKO.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while PAU.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check PAU.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while NVRO.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check NVRO.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CLCO.V trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CLCO.V's competition here
PFB.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CUPR.CN trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CUPR.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while FTEL.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +18.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to FTEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check FTEL.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ATHA.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ATHA.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while AUAG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check AUAG.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs CAM.V Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CAM.V trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CAM.V's competition here
PFB.TO vs MPVD.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MPVD.TO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while MPVD.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas MPVD.TO's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPVD.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to MPVD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check MPVD.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while IGLD.CN trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PFB.TO has daily volatility of 0.12 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check IGLD.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs SIZE.NE Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SIZE.NE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while SIZE.NE trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas SIZE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIZE.NE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to SIZE.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check SIZE.NE's competition here
PFB.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CFE.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CFE.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while LECR.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check LECR.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ACDX.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ACDX.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while AUMN.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check AUMN.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs HML.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while HML.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -24.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check HML.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while MLKM.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check MLKM.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while WDGY.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check WDGY.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while PMS.CN trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +3.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check PMS.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while LTHM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check LTHM.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while CRC.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check CRC.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while TAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check TAI.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while ORGN.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check ORGN.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while PNGC.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check PNGC.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while GLDS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check GLDS.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 943.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while TGLD.CN trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check TGLD.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while FABL.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check FABL.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 754.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while TAUR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check TAUR.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 719.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while NVR.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check NVR.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 505.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while SAND.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of +286.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check SAND.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while AGE.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check AGE.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 76.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while MUSK.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check MUSK.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs FOXY.CN Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FOXY.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while FOXY.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas FOXY.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FOXY.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to FOXY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check FOXY.CN's competition here
PFB.TO vs GCM.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GCM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while GCM.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas GCM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GCM.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to GCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check GCM.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs AXU.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AXU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while AXU.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas AXU.TO's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AXU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to AXU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check AXU.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs XGC.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, XGC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while XGC.TO trades at CA$30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas XGC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XGC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to XGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check XGC.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs MMX.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MMX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while MMX.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas MMX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMX.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to MMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check MMX.TO's competition here
PFB.TO vs NSR.TO Comparison August 2025
PFB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFB.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NSR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFB.TO is priced at CA$24.10, while NSR.TO trades at CA$9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.02, whereas NSR.TO's P/E ratio is 967.00. In terms of profitability, PFB.TO's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFB.TO is less volatile compared to NSR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFB.TO.Check NSR.TO's competition here