Petra Diamonds Limited
Petra Diamonds Limited (PDLMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PDLMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDLMF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 52.2M | -0.45 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $55.56 | -4.11% | 40.8B | 89.39 | $0.62 | +1.60% |
| ANGPY | $18.98 | +1.77% | 29.9B | 379.60 | $0.05 | +3.04% |
| IMPUY | $21.43 | +3.53% | 19.4B | 429.40 | $0.05 | +0.44% |
| IMPUF | $17.85 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.53% |
| MMSMY | $46.78 | -1.72% | 13.4B | 44.13 | $1.06 | +0.39% |
| JINFF | $26.61 | +1.76% | 10.5B | 25.83 | $1.03 | +0.30% |
| GMINF | $39.55 | +5.30% | 8.8B | 34.04 | $1.13 | N/A |
| XZJCF | $130.42 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 24.70 | $5.28 | +0.98% |
| OICT | $11.25 | +0.00% | 6.2B | -38.40 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PDLMF vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while FNLPF trades at $55.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 89.39. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check FNLPF's competition here
PDLMF vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ANGPY trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 379.60. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ANGPY's competition here
PDLMF vs IMPUY Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while IMPUY trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 429.40. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check IMPUY's competition here
PDLMF vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while IMPUF trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check IMPUF's competition here
PDLMF vs MMSMY Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while MMSMY trades at $46.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check MMSMY's competition here
PDLMF vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while JINFF trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check JINFF's competition here
PDLMF vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while GMINF trades at $39.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check GMINF's competition here
PDLMF vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and XZJCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XZJCF's competition here
PDLMF vs OICT Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while OICT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check OICT's competition here
PDLMF vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPNF's competition here
PDLMF vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ABBRF trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -115.51. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ABBRF's competition here
PDLMF vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ZMPLF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and ZMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMPLF's competition here
PDLMF vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POYYF's competition here
PDLMF vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while GLGDF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check GLGDF's competition here
PDLMF vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check AUCOY's competition here
PDLMF vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while TIHRF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check TIHRF's competition here
PDLMF vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and FCSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCSUF's competition here
PDLMF vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while BKRRF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check BKRRF's competition here
PDLMF vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SAPLF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SAPLF's competition here
PDLMF vs SLVTF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SLVTF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -72.91. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SLVTF's competition here
PDLMF vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while BRVMF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -113.83. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check BRVMF's competition here
PDLMF vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while IAUFF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and IAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAUFF's competition here
PDLMF vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check TPRFF's competition here
PDLMF vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while HGLD trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check HGLD's competition here
PDLMF vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 288.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while GOTRF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check GOTRF's competition here
PDLMF vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SMDRF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SMDRF's competition here
PDLMF vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while CHPGF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -83.75. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check CHPGF's competition here
PDLMF vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SSVFF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SSVFF's competition here
PDLMF vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check PAASF's competition here
PDLMF vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ORVMF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ORVMF's competition here
PDLMF vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while CAPTF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -168.10. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check CAPTF's competition here
PDLMF vs TBXXF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while TBXXF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check TBXXF's competition here
PDLMF vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and BOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOCOF's competition here
PDLMF vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SNNGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and SNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNNGF's competition here
PDLMF vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and PLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLHF's competition here
PDLMF vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and XANAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XANAF's competition here
PDLMF vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while AGLDF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check AGLDF's competition here
PDLMF vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while OCGSF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check OCGSF's competition here
PDLMF vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while NAUFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and NAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAUFF's competition here
PDLMF vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SCTSF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SCTSF's competition here
PDLMF vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SDRC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -312.10. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SDRC's competition here
PDLMF vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ACRG trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -17.76. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and ACRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRG's competition here
PDLMF vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while EMPYF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check EMPYF's competition here
PDLMF vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while PGLDF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check PGLDF's competition here
PDLMF vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check CTNXF's competition here
PDLMF vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while LGCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check LGCXF's competition here
PDLMF vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ELRFF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and ELRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELRFF's competition here
PDLMF vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while TEUTF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -28.17. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check TEUTF's competition here
PDLMF vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while TSORF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check TSORF's competition here
PDLMF vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while AMNP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check AMNP's competition here
PDLMF vs LUCRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check LUCRF's competition here
PDLMF vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while DNCVF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check DNCVF's competition here
PDLMF vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while AGMRF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check AGMRF's competition here
PDLMF vs THMG Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while THMG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -43.98. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check THMG's competition here
PDLMF vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while KDKCF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check KDKCF's competition here
PDLMF vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while LBCMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check LBCMF's competition here
PDLMF vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while VIPRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check VIPRF's competition here
PDLMF vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while EQMEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check EQMEF's competition here
PDLMF vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and HEGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEGLF's competition here
PDLMF vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while VLMGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check VLMGF's competition here
PDLMF vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ARRKF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ARRKF's competition here
PDLMF vs BBBXF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while BBBXF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check BBBXF's competition here
PDLMF vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while MMNGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check MMNGF's competition here
PDLMF vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while CPPMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check CPPMF's competition here
PDLMF vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while DNRSF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check DNRSF's competition here
PDLMF vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while BRGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check BRGC's competition here
PDLMF vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ACKRF's competition here
PDLMF vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SMOFF's competition here
PDLMF vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and VTXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTXXF's competition here
PDLMF vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while EMPPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check EMPPF's competition here
PDLMF vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ATEPF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ATEPF's competition here
PDLMF vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and CTMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTMCF's competition here
PDLMF vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while RKHNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and RKHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKHNF's competition here
PDLMF vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while KGFMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and KGFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGFMF's competition here
PDLMF vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and ADYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADYRF's competition here
PDLMF vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while DYNR trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and DYNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DYNR's competition here
PDLMF vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while PNTRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check PNTRF's competition here
PDLMF vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SSVRF's competition here
PDLMF vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while PVGDF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check PVGDF's competition here
PDLMF vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMRRF's competition here
PDLMF vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while MRZLF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check MRZLF's competition here
PDLMF vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and CJIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CJIMF's competition here
PDLMF vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while WEXPF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check WEXPF's competition here
PDLMF vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check OKPRF's competition here
PDLMF vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while WAMFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check WAMFF's competition here
PDLMF vs RITE Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check RITE's competition here
PDLMF vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and TLSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSMF's competition here
PDLMF vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PDLMF has daily volatility of 0.00 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
PDLMF vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SUNPF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SUNPF's competition here
PDLMF vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ESGLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ESGLF's competition here
PDLMF vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check GLDRF's competition here
PDLMF vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check ASLRF's competition here
PDLMF vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SBMCF's competition here
PDLMF vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while STRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check STRFF's competition here
PDLMF vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and SHGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGDF's competition here
PDLMF vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check AUCUF's competition here
PDLMF vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check URVNF's competition here
PDLMF vs SBLRF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while SBLRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +5.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF is less volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDLMF.Check SBLRF's competition here
PDLMF vs GSMGF Comparison February 2026
PDLMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDLMF stands at 52.2M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDLMF is priced at $0.27, while GSMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDLMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, PDLMF's ROE is -0.69%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PDLMF and GSMGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSMGF's competition here