ProCredit Holding AG & Co. KGaA
ProCredit Holding AG & Co. KGaA (PCZ.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PCZ.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCZ.DE | €9.10 | +0.89% | 534.8M | 5.57 | €1.63 | +6.50% |
IES.DE | €5.43 | +6.78% | 92.4B | 10.40 | €0.50 | +6.56% |
BNP.DE | €78.92 | +1.96% | 87.8B | 8.33 | €9.43 | +6.10% |
LLD.DE | €0.93 | +1.09% | 55.6B | 11.63 | €0.08 | +4.05% |
DBK.DE | €29.10 | +3.71% | 55B | 11.66 | €2.45 | +2.38% |
UB5.DE | €33.68 | -0.18% | 54.3B | 9.46 | €3.56 | +5.49% |
SGE.DE | €52.36 | +2.99% | 35.6B | 9.33 | €5.53 | +2.11% |
SGE.F | €52.00 | +0.74% | 35.5B | 9.31 | €5.53 | +2.11% |
CBK.DE | €31.67 | +6.03% | 34.2B | 13.84 | €2.19 | +2.15% |
SEBC.F | €15.40 | -1.28% | 31.4B | 10.58 | €1.44 | +0.16% |
Stock Comparison
PCZ.DE vs IES.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, IES.DE has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while IES.DE trades at €5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas IES.DE's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IES.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to IES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check IES.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs BNP.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, BNP.DE has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while BNP.DE trades at €78.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas BNP.DE's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNP.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to BNP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check BNP.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs LLD.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, LLD.DE has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while LLD.DE trades at €0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas LLD.DE's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLD.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to LLD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check LLD.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs DBK.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, DBK.DE has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while DBK.DE trades at €29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas DBK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to DBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check DBK.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs UB5.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, UB5.DE has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while UB5.DE trades at €33.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas UB5.DE's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UB5.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to UB5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check UB5.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs SGE.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, SGE.DE has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while SGE.DE trades at €52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas SGE.DE's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGE.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to SGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check SGE.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs SGE.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, SGE.F has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while SGE.F trades at €52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas SGE.F's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGE.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to SGE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check SGE.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs CBK.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, CBK.DE has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while CBK.DE trades at €31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CBK.DE's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBK.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to CBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check CBK.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs SEBC.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, SEBC.F has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while SEBC.F trades at €15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas SEBC.F's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEBC.F's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to SEBC.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check SEBC.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs 4FY.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, 4FY.F has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while 4FY.F trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas 4FY.F's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 4FY.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to 4FY.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check 4FY.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs RN70.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, RN70.F has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while RN70.F trades at €15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RN70.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RN70.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to RN70.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check RN70.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs BIRG.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, BIRG.DE has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while BIRG.DE trades at €12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas BIRG.DE's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIRG.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to BIRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check BIRG.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs RAW.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, RAW.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while RAW.DE trades at €25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RAW.DE's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAW.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to RAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check RAW.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs KTB1.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, KTB1.F has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while KTB1.F trades at €0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas KTB1.F's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KTB1.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to KTB1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check KTB1.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs TMLF.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, TMLF.F has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while TMLF.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TMLF.F's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMLF.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to TMLF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check TMLF.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs 47T.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, 47T.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while 47T.F trades at €2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas 47T.F's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 47T.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to 47T.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check 47T.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs ARLN.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, ARLN.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while ARLN.DE trades at €33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ARLN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARLN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to ARLN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check ARLN.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs ARL.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, ARL.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while ARL.DE trades at €33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ARL.DE's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to ARL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check ARL.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs ARLN.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, ARLN.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while ARLN.F trades at €33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ARLN.F's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARLN.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to ARLN.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check ARLN.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs ZYE1.F Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, ZYE1.F has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while ZYE1.F trades at €21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ZYE1.F's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZYE1.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to ZYE1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check ZYE1.F's competition here
PCZ.DE vs UBK.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, UBK.DE has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while UBK.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas UBK.DE's P/E ratio is 262.00. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is more volatile compared to UBK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check UBK.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs QB7.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, QB7.DE has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while QB7.DE trades at €3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas QB7.DE's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QB7.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to QB7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check QB7.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs MBK.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, MBK.DE has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while MBK.DE trades at €17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MBK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to MBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check MBK.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs VG8.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, VG8.DE has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while VG8.DE trades at €2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas VG8.DE's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VG8.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to VG8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check VG8.DE's competition here
PCZ.DE vs MBC.DE Comparison July 2025
PCZ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCZ.DE stands at 534.8M. In comparison, MBC.DE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCZ.DE is priced at €9.10, while MBC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCZ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MBC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PCZ.DE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBC.DE's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PCZ.DE is less volatile compared to MBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCZ.DE.Check MBC.DE's competition here