Pollard Banknote Limited (TSX: PBL.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Pollard Banknote Limited (TSX: PBL.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 494M. In comparison, GH.TO has a market cap of 282.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at CA$18.25 on the TSX, while GH.TO trades at CA$13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.96, whereas GH.TO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GH.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to GH.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.Check GH.TO's competition here

Pollard Banknote Limited (TSX: PBL.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 494M. In comparison, FANS.TO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at CA$18.25 on the TSX, while FANS.TO trades at CA$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.96, whereas FANS.TO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FANS.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is less volatile compared to FANS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.Check FANS.TO's competition here

Pollard Banknote Limited (TSX: PBL.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 494M. In comparison, SKLL.CN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at CA$18.25 on the TSX, while SKLL.CN trades at CA$0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.96, whereas SKLL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKLL.CN's ROE of +4.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to SKLL.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.Check SKLL.CN's competition here

Pollard Banknote Limited (TSX: PBL.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 494M. In comparison, JKPT.CN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at CA$18.25 on the TSX, while JKPT.CN trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.96, whereas JKPT.CN's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JKPT.CN's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to JKPT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.Check JKPT.CN's competition here

Pollard Banknote Limited (TSX: PBL.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 494M. In comparison, GC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at CA$18.25 on the TSX, while GC.TO trades at CA$44.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.96, whereas GC.TO's P/E ratio is -30.19. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GC.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to GC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.Check GC.TO's competition here