Peekaboo Beans Inc.
Peekaboo Beans Inc. (PBBSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBBSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBBSF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 907.8K | -0.60 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| HNNMY | $2.72 | -2.86% | 111.7B | 21.00 | $0.13 | +4.80% |
| HMRZF | $14.40 | +0.00% | 23.1B | 22.15 | $0.65 | +4.52% |
| MONRF | $55.04 | -1.81% | 14.9B | 20.69 | $2.66 | +2.66% |
| MONRY | $54.32 | +0.03% | 14.9B | 20.62 | $2.66 | +2.68% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
| SHZHY | $7.28 | -0.82% | 11.2B | 12.88 | $0.58 | +4.35% |
| TRYIY | $13.91 | +2.81% | 10.8B | 20.98 | $0.66 | +0.99% |
| TRYIF | $6.63 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 20.09 | $0.33 | +1.84% |
| LPPSY | $20.41 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 18.39 | $1.11 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
PBBSF vs HNNMY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while HNNMY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check HNNMY's competition here
PBBSF vs HMRZF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while HMRZF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and HMRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMRZF's competition here
PBBSF vs MONRF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while MONRF trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and MONRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MONRF's competition here
PBBSF vs MONRY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while MONRY trades at $54.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check MONRY's competition here
PBBSF vs SZHIF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and SZHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZHIF's competition here
PBBSF vs SHZHY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SHZHY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and SHZHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHZHY's competition here
PBBSF vs TRYIY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TRYIY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check TRYIY's competition here
PBBSF vs TRYIF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TRYIF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check TRYIF's competition here
PBBSF vs LPPSY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while LPPSY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and LPPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPPSY's competition here
PBBSF vs BSDGY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while BSDGY trades at $29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check BSDGY's competition here
PBBSF vs BSDGF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while BSDGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check BSDGF's competition here
PBBSF vs RYPPF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check RYPPF's competition here
PBBSF vs BOSSY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while BOSSY trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and BOSSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOSSY's competition here
PBBSF vs CGGGF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CGGGF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check CGGGF's competition here
PBBSF vs WACLY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while WACLY trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check WACLY's competition here
PBBSF vs DELTF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while DELTF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and DELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELTF's competition here
PBBSF vs SERNF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and SERNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SERNF's competition here
PBBSF vs JNBYF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 784.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while JNBYF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check JNBYF's competition here
PBBSF vs WACLF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and WACLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WACLF's competition here
PBBSF vs TSIHF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TSIHF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and TSIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSIHF's competition here
PBBSF vs MKKOF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check MKKOF's competition here
PBBSF vs JWTXF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and JWTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JWTXF's competition here
PBBSF vs VDEVF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and VDEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDEVF's competition here
PBBSF vs CDGXY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CDGXY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and CDGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDGXY's competition here
PBBSF vs CDGXF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CDGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check CDGXF's competition here
PBBSF vs WQTEF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check WQTEF's competition here
PBBSF vs ECNLF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while ECNLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check ECNLF's competition here
PBBSF vs CHRLF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and CHRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHRLF's competition here
PBBSF vs TFRFF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and TFRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFRFF's competition here
PBBSF vs NLLGF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and NLLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NLLGF's competition here
PBBSF vs TAPCF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and TAPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAPCF's competition here
PBBSF vs IFABF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while IFABF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check IFABF's competition here
PBBSF vs USYNF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and USYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USYNF's competition here
PBBSF vs TUGHF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check TUGHF's competition here
PBBSF vs SEPGY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and SEPGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEPGY's competition here
PBBSF vs SEPGF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check SEPGF's competition here
PBBSF vs AVLP Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and AVLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVLP's competition here
PBBSF vs TALN Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TALN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and TALN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TALN's competition here
PBBSF vs AHRO Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check AHRO's competition here
PBBSF vs JLMC Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and JLMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JLMC's competition here
PBBSF vs CGAC Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check CGAC's competition here
PBBSF vs SKFG Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 477.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and SKFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKFG's competition here
PBBSF vs BLFR Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 176.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while BLFR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check BLFR's competition here
PBBSF vs CRTL Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 143.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CRTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check CRTL's competition here
PBBSF vs SUUB Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check SUUB's competition here
PBBSF vs AGNY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and AGNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGNY's competition here
PBBSF vs CIND Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check CIND's competition here
PBBSF vs OMVE Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check OMVE's competition here
PBBSF vs LYJN Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check LYJN's competition here
PBBSF vs TRUA Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check TRUA's competition here
PBBSF vs EDSFF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check EDSFF's competition here
PBBSF vs APPM Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and APPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APPM's competition here
PBBSF vs IBGR Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check IBGR's competition here
PBBSF vs LZENF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and LZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LZENF's competition here
PBBSF vs SSTU Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBBSF.Check SSTU's competition here
PBBSF vs SUFF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and SUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUFF's competition here
PBBSF vs GLLHF Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and GLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLLHF's competition here
PBBSF vs WLFDY Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and WLFDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLFDY's competition here
PBBSF vs JKRO Comparison July 2025
PBBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBBSF stands at 907.8K. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBBSF is priced at $0.02, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBBSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBBSF and JKRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JKRO's competition here