Loading...

Lyxor PEA Chine (MSCI China) UCITS ETF

PASI.PAEURONEXT
Financial Services
Asset Management
10.49
-0.07(-0.66%)

Lyxor PEA Chine (MSCI China) UCITS ETF (PASI.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (PASI.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
PASI.PA€10.49-0.66%53.9M11.86€0.88N/A
IWDA.AS€104.70+0.45%100.2BN/AN/AN/A
VUSA.AS€105.23+0.43%62BN/AN/A+1.07%
VWRL.AS€133.24+0.48%36.9BN/AN/A+1.55%
SP5C.PA€399.19+0.48%20.4B27.51€14.51N/A
SP5H.PA€314.55+0.00%19.9B27.46€11.45+1.19%
IUSA.AS€55.31+0.51%16.6BN/AN/A+1.03%
ISFA.AS€10.30+0.04%14.9BN/AN/A+3.43%
AMUN.PA€65.15+1.24%13.3B10.23€6.37+6.60%
HAL.AS€125.60+0.64%11.3B9.38€13.39+2.32%
Showing 1 to 10 of 100 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

PASI.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison July 2025

PASI.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PASI.PA stands at 53.9M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PASI.PA is priced at €10.49, while IWDA.AS trades at €104.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PASI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.86, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PASI.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PASI.PA is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASI.PA.Check IWDA.AS's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Financial Services Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;