BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE (PAC.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAC.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC.DE | €15.00 | -0.41% | 231.1M | 19.46 | €0.77 | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €355.47 | +0.81% | 3T | 16.79 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €307.87 | +0.81% | 2.6T | 16.76 | €18.37 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €287.55 | -0.04% | 2.4T | 15.69 | €18.32 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €151.48 | -1.64% | 185.8B | 47.19 | €3.21 | +2.26% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €76.09 | +0.49% | 117.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWLE.DE | €9.15 | +0.05% | 115.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.20% |
| SXR8.DE | €595.82 | +0.52% | 110.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | €104.99 | +0.23% | 100.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAC.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €355.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €307.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €287.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 185.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while BBN1.F trades at €151.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check BBN1.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 117.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while ZPDW.DE trades at €76.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IWLE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SXR8.DE trades at €595.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EUNL.DE trades at €104.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while U1FB.DE trades at €24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VUSA.DE trades at €105.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VUAA.DE trades at €106.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SXRZ.DE trades at €239.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs D500.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while D500.DE trades at €51.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check D500.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs E500.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while E500.DE trades at €49.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE and E500.DE have similar daily volatility (0.93).Check E500.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs P500.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while P500.DE trades at €1,107.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XJSE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VWCE.DE trades at €135.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VGWL.DE trades at €133.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VGWL.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check A4S.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,107.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
PAC.DE vs AW1Q.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while AW1Q.DE trades at €17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SPY5.DE trades at €558.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IBC3.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs CBUC.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs NQSE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs LYPS.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while LYPS.DE trades at €57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while LYP2.DE trades at €315.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 6TVM.DE trades at €57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while PPFB.SG trades at €55.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
PAC.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while TR1.DU trades at €91.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check TR1.DU's competition here
PAC.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XDWD.DE trades at €114.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XDWL.DE trades at €96.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EDMU.DE trades at €10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IUSA.DE trades at €55.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EQQQ.DE trades at €500.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IUSQ.DE trades at €87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SLUS.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while JUHE.DE trades at €51.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SPPW.DE trades at €38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while JRUD.DE trades at €51.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while JREU.DE trades at €55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check JREU.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while DWS.DE trades at €52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check DWS.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
PAC.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XD9U.DE trades at €164.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XD9E.DE trades at €129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EUNK.DE trades at €86.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while QDVE.DE trades at €33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XDEW.DE trades at €88.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
PAC.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while LYYA.DE trades at €358.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while D5BM.DE trades at €111.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while STXH.DE trades at €141.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EXS1.DE trades at €199.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs 2B7J.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while LYP6.DE trades at €261.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs CBUE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VGVF.DE trades at €107.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VGVE.DE trades at €103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE and VGVE.DE have similar daily volatility (0.93).Check VGVE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XWEH.DE trades at €44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while DBXW.DE trades at €112.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EXW1.DE trades at €54.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EUNW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XZMU.DE trades at €60.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IQQW.DE trades at €76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE and DBXE.DE have similar daily volatility (0.93).Check DBXE.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SPP1.DE trades at €22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while H4ZF.DE trades at €56.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs SXR7.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while SXR7.DE trades at €201.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while VGWD.DE trades at €65.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €56.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here
PAC.DE vs LCUW.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check LCUW.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check EXIC.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs XZW0.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XZW0.DE trades at €41.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XMME.DE trades at €58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check TCC4.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs DECR.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while DECR.DE trades at €47.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check DECR.DE's competition here
PAC.DE vs XMME.F Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check XMME.F's competition here
PAC.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison August 2025
PAC.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC.DE stands at 231.1M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC.DE is priced at €15.00, while DBXD.DE trades at €225.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, PAC.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC.DE is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.DE.Check DBXD.DE's competition here