Amundi MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned Pab Umwelt ETF
Amundi MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned Pab Umwelt ETF (PABV.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PABV.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PABV.F | €44.11 | +1.31% | 358.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €355.47 | +0.81% | 3T | 16.79 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €307.87 | +0.81% | 2.6T | 16.76 | €18.37 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €287.55 | -0.04% | 2.4T | 15.69 | €18.32 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €147.78 | -2.44% | 185.7B | 45.81 | €3.21 | +2.35% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €74.87 | -1.61% | 115.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWLE.DE | €8.94 | -2.27% | 112.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.24% |
| SXR8.DE | €576.04 | -3.32% | 107.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €24.40 | -1.39% | 98.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PABV.F vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €355.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
PABV.F vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €307.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
PABV.F vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €287.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
PABV.F vs BBN1.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 185.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while BBN1.F trades at €147.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 45.81. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check BBN1.F's competition here
PABV.F vs BLQA.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs ZPDW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while ZPDW.DE trades at €74.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IWLE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IWLE.DE trades at €8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SXR8.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SXR8.DE trades at €576.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs U1FB.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while U1FB.DE trades at €24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EUNL.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EUNL.DE trades at €101.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VUAA.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VUAA.DE trades at €103.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VUSA.DE trades at €102.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SXRZ.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SXRZ.DE trades at €236.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XJSE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XJSE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs E500.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while E500.DE trades at €48.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check E500.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs P500.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while P500.DE trades at €1,071.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check P500.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs D500.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while D500.DE trades at €50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check D500.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VWCE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VWCE.DE trades at €132.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VGWL.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VGWL.DE trades at €129.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VGWL.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VGWL.F's competition here
PABV.F vs A4S.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check A4S.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SPPE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs AW1Q.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while AW1Q.DE trades at €17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,071.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
PABV.F vs SPY5.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SPY5.DE trades at €539.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IBC3.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IBC3.F's competition here
PABV.F vs IS3N.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IBC3.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs CBUC.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs PPFB.SG Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while PPFB.SG trades at €56.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
PABV.F vs NQSE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs LYP2.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while LYP2.DE trades at €307.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs LYPS.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while LYPS.DE trades at €55.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs 6TVM.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 6TVM.DE trades at €55.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs TR1.DU Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while TR1.DU trades at €87.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check TR1.DU's competition here
PABV.F vs XDWD.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XDWD.DE trades at €111.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XDWL.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XDWL.DE trades at €93.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EDMU.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs OM3L.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SXRV.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,130.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IUSA.DE trades at €53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IUSZ.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EUN5.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EQQQ.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EQQQ.DE trades at €482.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IUSQ.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IUSQ.DE trades at €84.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SGAS.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SLUS.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs JUHE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while JUHE.DE trades at €49.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SPPW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SPPW.DE trades at €37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs JRUD.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while JRUD.DE trades at €50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs JREU.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while JREU.DE trades at €53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check JREU.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs DWS.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while DWS.DE trades at €50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check DWS.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EGV2.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IQQY.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IQQY.DE trades at €33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs QDVE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while QDVE.DE trades at €32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XD9E.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XD9E.DE trades at €126.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs 2B7K.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
PABV.F vs XD9D.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XD9D.DE trades at €20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XD9U.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XD9U.DE trades at €158.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EUNK.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EUNK.DE trades at €84.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XDEE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
PABV.F vs XDEW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XDEW.DE trades at €85.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs LYYA.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while LYYA.DE trades at €347.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XS5E.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs D5BM.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while D5BM.DE trades at €107.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs STXH.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while STXH.DE trades at €138.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check STXH.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EXIC.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EXIC.DE trades at €6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EXS1.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EXS1.DE trades at €194.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs 2B7J.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here
PABV.F vs LYP6.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while LYP6.DE trades at €255.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs CBUE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EXSA.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EXSA.DE trades at €53.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EXIE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VGVE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VGVE.DE trades at €100.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VGVF.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VGVF.DE trades at €104.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XWEH.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XWEH.DE trades at €43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EUNW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs DBXW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while DBXW.DE trades at €109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs EXW1.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EXW1.DE trades at €52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XZMU.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XZMU.DE trades at €58.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IQQW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IQQW.DE trades at €74.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs DBXE.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check DBXE.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs VGWD.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while VGWD.DE trades at €63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SPP1.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SPP1.DE trades at €21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs SXR7.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while SXR7.DE trades at €196.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs LCUW.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check LCUW.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs H4ZF.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while H4ZF.DE trades at €54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here
PABV.F vs EXIC.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check EXIC.F's competition here
PABV.F vs TCC4.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check TCC4.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs DECR.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while DECR.DE trades at €47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is more volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check DECR.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XMME.F Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XMME.F's competition here
PABV.F vs XMME.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XMME.DE trades at €56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XMME.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs XZW0.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while XZW0.DE trades at €40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
PABV.F vs DBXU.DE Comparison August 2025
PABV.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PABV.F stands at 358.1M. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PABV.F is priced at €44.11, while DBXU.DE trades at €173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PABV.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PABV.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PABV.F is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PABV.F.Check DBXU.DE's competition here