Osiris Corporation
Osiris Corporation OSRS Peers
See (OSRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSRS | $0.00 | +0.00% | 973.00 | N/A | -$0.92 | N/A |
| DTRUY | $22.45 | +1.08% | 71.02B | 11.06 | $2.03 | N/A |
| VOLVF | $29.56 | -1.17% | 60.14B | 12.63 | $2.34 | +6.38% |
| VLVLY | $28.59 | +1.00% | 58.16B | 12.27 | $2.33 | +5.90% |
| VOLAF | $26.00 | N/A | 52.77B | 11.16 | $2.33 | +7.26% |
| DTGHF | $45.12 | +3.01% | 34.35B | 11.09 | $4.07 | N/A |
| KMTUF | $31.56 | +5.18% | 29.12B | 9.95 | $3.17 | +4.08% |
| KMTUY | $29.97 | -0.07% | 27.66B | 9.28 | $3.23 | N/A |
| EPIAF | $23.79 | +5.10% | 27.56B | 31.30 | $0.76 | +0.85% |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | N/A | 25.34B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +0.81% |
Stock Comparison
OSRS vs DTRUY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 71.02B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while DTRUY trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs VOLVF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 60.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while VOLVF trades at $29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs VLVLY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 58.16B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while VLVLY trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs VOLAF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 52.77B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while VOLAF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and VOLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs DTGHF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 34.35B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while DTGHF trades at $45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs KMTUF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 29.12B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KMTUF trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and KMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs KMTUY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 27.66B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KMTUY trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs EPIAF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 27.56B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while EPIAF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs EPOKY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.34B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs KIGRY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KIGRY trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs EPIPF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 20.93B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs OUKPY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 19.48B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while OUKPY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and OUKPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs TRATF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 17.23B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while TRATF trades at $34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs KUBTF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.86B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KUBTF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs ZLIOF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while ZLIOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs ZLIOY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while ZLIOY trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs OUKPF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs SHKLY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while SHKLY trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs SHKLF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and SHKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs HTCMY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while HTCMY trades at $59.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs KNCRY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KNCRY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and KNCRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs HTCMF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and HTCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs KNNGF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KNNGF trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs KNCRF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KNCRF trades at $57.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs KUBTY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while KUBTY trades at $56.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs SNYYF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while SNYYF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs WKRCF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while WKRCF trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs FIRRF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs PLFRF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while PLFRF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs LKHLY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs PLFRY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and PLFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs LONKF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while LONKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs AGGZF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 517.33M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while AGGZF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -18.86. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs FIRRY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484.05M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and FIRRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs AUSTF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.21M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and AUSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs QGLHF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 175.25M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs TGHLF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 173.96M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while TGHLF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs PLPKF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.88M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs BIIAF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47.00M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and BIIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs FBRKF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 36.98M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while FBRKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs CLEV Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 14.03M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while CLEV trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and CLEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs GWPD Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while GWPD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs CUBXF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while CUBXF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs AMMX Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while AMMX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs AIFM Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 692997.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while AIFM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs WWTIF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 532354.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and WWTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs GRSO Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460599.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs CYLC Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 328910.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs CLGPF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11654.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while CLGPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSRS.
OSRS vs ZEVY Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 1319.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and ZEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs BWOWF Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and BWOWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
OSRS vs GRNH Comparison
OSRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSRS stands at 973.00. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385.00. Regarding current trading prices, OSRS is priced at $0.00, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSRS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSRS's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OSRS and GRNH have similar daily volatility (0.00).