Orvana Minerals Corp.
Orvana Minerals Corp. ORV.TO Peers
See (ORV.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORV.TO | $0.54 | -3.57% | 73.78M | 18.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| TFPM.TO | $27.80 | +1.31% | 5.58B | 695.00 | $0.04 | +0.78% |
| GMIN.TO | $18.28 | -1.93% | 4.12B | 35.15 | $0.52 | N/A |
| CGG.TO | $9.26 | +8.69% | 3.67B | 42.09 | $0.22 | +1.18% |
| GATO.TO | $21.59 | +5.73% | 1.50B | 32.22 | $0.67 | N/A |
| ARIS.TO | $7.91 | +1.28% | 1.41B | 37.67 | $0.21 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | $4.67 | +3.78% | 1.35B | -25.94 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| PPTA.TO | $16.99 | +5.59% | 1.22B | -41.44 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| SLS.TO | $4.81 | +5.71% | 785.16M | -7.07 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| GGD.TO | $1.72 | +2.38% | 544.36M | 172.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ORV.TO vs TFPM.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, TFPM.TO has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while TFPM.TO trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TFPM.TO's P/E ratio is 695.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFPM.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to TFPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs GMIN.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, GMIN.TO has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while GMIN.TO trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas GMIN.TO's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMIN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to GMIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs CGG.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CGG.TO has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CGG.TO trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CGG.TO's P/E ratio is 42.09. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to CGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs GATO.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, GATO.TO has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while GATO.TO trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas GATO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATO.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to GATO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ARIS.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ARIS.TO has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ARIS.TO trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ARIS.TO's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ARIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while EDR.TO trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -25.94. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs PPTA.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, PPTA.TO has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while PPTA.TO trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PPTA.TO's P/E ratio is -41.44. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPTA.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to PPTA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs SLS.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, SLS.TO has a market cap of 785.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while SLS.TO trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas SLS.TO's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLS.TO's ROE of -14.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to SLS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs GGD.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, GGD.TO has a market cap of 544.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while GGD.TO trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas GGD.TO's P/E ratio is 172.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to GGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs MUX.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, MUX.TO has a market cap of 538.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while MUX.TO trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas MUX.TO's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUX.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to MUX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ASM.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ASM.TO has a market cap of 538.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ASM.TO trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ASM.TO's P/E ratio is 46.88. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to ASM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ABRA.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ABRA.TO has a market cap of 486.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ABRA.TO trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ABRA.TO's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABRA.TO's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ABRA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ALLI.NE Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ALLI.NE has a market cap of 276.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ALLI.NE trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ALLI.NE's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALLI.NE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ALLI.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs NUAG.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 272.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while NUAG.TO trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -39.75. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs VOXR.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, VOXR.TO has a market cap of 239.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while VOXR.TO trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas VOXR.TO's P/E ratio is -117.75. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOXR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to VOXR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs HSLV.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, HSLV.CN has a market cap of 230.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while HSLV.CN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas HSLV.CN's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSLV.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to HSLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs PTM.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, PTM.TO has a market cap of 162.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while PTM.TO trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PTM.TO's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTM.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to PTM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs LUC.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, LUC.TO has a market cap of 112.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while LUC.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas LUC.TO's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to LUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs XAM.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, XAM.TO has a market cap of 86.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while XAM.TO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas XAM.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XAM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to XAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs DMET.NE Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, DMET.NE has a market cap of 78.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while DMET.NE trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas DMET.NE's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DMET.NE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to DMET.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs SM.V Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, SM.V has a market cap of 69.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while SM.V trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas SM.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SM.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to SM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs DIAM.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, DIAM.TO has a market cap of 37.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while DIAM.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas DIAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIAM.TO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to DIAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs PAU.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, PAU.CN has a market cap of 28.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while PAU.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PAU.CN's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAU.CN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to PAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ESAU.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ESAU.CN has a market cap of 26.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ESAU.CN trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ESAU.CN's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESAU.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ESAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs AUCU.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, AUCU.CN has a market cap of 26.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while AUCU.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas AUCU.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUCU.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to AUCU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs EMPS.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, EMPS.CN has a market cap of 25.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while EMPS.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas EMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMPS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to EMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ELR.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ELR.TO has a market cap of 24.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ELR.TO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ELR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELR.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ELR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs CUAU.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CUAU.CN has a market cap of 23.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CUAU.CN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CUAU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUAU.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to CUAU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs NVRO.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, NVRO.CN has a market cap of 21.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while NVRO.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas NVRO.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVRO.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to NVRO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs FTEL.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, FTEL.CN has a market cap of 14.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while FTEL.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas FTEL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTEL.CN's ROE of +11.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to FTEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ATHA.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ATHA.CN has a market cap of 12.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ATHA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ATHA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATHA.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ATHA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs MPVD.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, MPVD.TO has a market cap of 12.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while MPVD.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas MPVD.TO's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPVD.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to MPVD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs AUAG.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, AUAG.CN has a market cap of 11.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while AUAG.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas AUAG.CN's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUAG.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to AUAG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs CUPR.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CUPR.CN has a market cap of 10.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CUPR.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUPR.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to CUPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs CLCO.V Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CLCO.V has a market cap of 9.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CLCO.V trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CLCO.V's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLCO.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to CLCO.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs IGLD.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, IGLD.CN has a market cap of 8.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while IGLD.CN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas IGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IGLD.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ORV.TO has daily volatility of 9.17 and IGLD.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
ORV.TO vs CAM.V Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CAM.V has a market cap of 6.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CAM.V trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CAM.V's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAM.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to CAM.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs LECR.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, LECR.CN has a market cap of 5.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while LECR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas LECR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LECR.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to LECR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs CFE.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CFE.CN has a market cap of 4.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CFE.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CFE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFE.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to CFE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs HML.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, HML.CN has a market cap of 3.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while HML.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas HML.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HML.CN's ROE of -16.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to HML.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 3.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while AUMN.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs WDGY.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, WDGY.CN has a market cap of 3.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while WDGY.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas WDGY.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGY.CN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to WDGY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs CRC.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, CRC.CN has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while CRC.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CRC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRC.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to CRC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ACDX.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ACDX.CN has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ACDX.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ACDX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACDX.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ACDX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs ORGN.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, ORGN.CN has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while ORGN.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas ORGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGN.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to ORGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs MLKM.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, MLKM.CN has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while MLKM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas MLKM.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLKM.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to MLKM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs TAI.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, TAI.CN has a market cap of 2.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while TAI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAI.CN's ROE of -4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to TAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs PNGC.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, PNGC.CN has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while PNGC.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PNGC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNGC.CN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to PNGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs GLDS.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, GLDS.CN has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while GLDS.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas GLDS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLDS.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to GLDS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs LTHM.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, LTHM.CN has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while LTHM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas LTHM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTHM.CN's ROE of -12.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to LTHM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs TAUR.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, TAUR.CN has a market cap of 1.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while TAUR.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TAUR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAUR.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to TAUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs PMS.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, PMS.CN has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while PMS.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas PMS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMS.CN's ROE of +177.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to PMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs MUSK.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, MUSK.CN has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while MUSK.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas MUSK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUSK.CN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to MUSK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs FABL.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, FABL.CN has a market cap of 869807.00. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while FABL.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas FABL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FABL.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to FABL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs TGLD.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, TGLD.CN has a market cap of 868875.00. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while TGLD.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TGLD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGLD.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to TGLD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs NVR.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, NVR.CN has a market cap of 719250.00. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while NVR.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas NVR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVR.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to NVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs SAND.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, SAND.CN has a market cap of 505421.00. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while SAND.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas SAND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAND.CN's ROE of -20.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is less volatile compared to SAND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.
ORV.TO vs AGE.CN Comparison
ORV.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ORV.TO stands at 73.78M. In comparison, AGE.CN has a market cap of 327375.00. Regarding current trading prices, ORV.TO is priced at $0.54, while AGE.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ORV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas AGE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ORV.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGE.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ORV.TO is more volatile compared to AGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ORV.TO.