Optima Technology Group Limited
Optima Technology Group Limited OPA.AX Peers
See (OPA.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA.AX | A$0.02 | -6.25% | 3.8M | -0.30 | -A$0.05 | N/A |
| WTC.AX | A$112.10 | +1.10% | 37.2B | 119.26 | A$0.94 | +0.18% |
| XRO.AX | A$178.01 | +0.86% | 27.4B | 132.84 | A$1.34 | N/A |
| TNE.AX | A$40.45 | -0.61% | 13.2B | 98.66 | A$0.41 | +0.68% |
| ALU.AX | A$68.33 | +0.07% | 9B | 84.36 | A$0.81 | N/A |
| 360.AX | A$33.11 | +1.94% | 7.6B | 473.00 | A$0.07 | N/A |
| OCL.AX | A$18.53 | -2.32% | 1.8B | 56.15 | A$0.33 | +0.97% |
| IRE.AX | A$7.78 | +1.04% | 1.4B | 16.91 | A$0.46 | +1.29% |
| HSN.AX | A$4.82 | -1.63% | 980.3M | 241.00 | A$0.02 | +2.07% |
| BVS.AX | A$2.07 | -2.82% | 928M | 12.94 | A$0.16 | +8.65% |
Stock Comparison
OPA.AX vs WTC.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WTC.AX has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while WTC.AX trades at A$112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas WTC.AX's P/E ratio is 119.26. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to WTC.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to WTC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs XRO.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, XRO.AX has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while XRO.AX trades at A$178.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas XRO.AX's P/E ratio is 132.84. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to XRO.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to XRO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs TNE.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TNE.AX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TNE.AX trades at A$40.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TNE.AX's P/E ratio is 98.66. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to TNE.AX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to TNE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ALU.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ALU.AX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ALU.AX trades at A$68.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ALU.AX's P/E ratio is 84.36. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ALU.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to ALU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs 360.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, 360.AX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 360.AX trades at A$33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas 360.AX's P/E ratio is 473.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to 360.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to 360.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs OCL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OCL.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while OCL.AX trades at A$18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OCL.AX's P/E ratio is 56.15. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to OCL.AX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to OCL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs IRE.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, IRE.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while IRE.AX trades at A$7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IRE.AX's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to IRE.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to IRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs HSN.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, HSN.AX has a market cap of 980.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HSN.AX trades at A$4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HSN.AX's P/E ratio is 241.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to HSN.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to HSN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs BVS.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BVS.AX has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BVS.AX trades at A$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BVS.AX's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to BVS.AX's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to BVS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs FCL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, FCL.AX has a market cap of 903.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while FCL.AX trades at A$2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FCL.AX's P/E ratio is -89.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to FCL.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to FCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs VGL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, VGL.AX has a market cap of 761.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while VGL.AX trades at A$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VGL.AX's P/E ratio is -106.33. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to VGL.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to VGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs NXL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, NXL.AX has a market cap of 717.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while NXL.AX trades at A$2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NXL.AX's P/E ratio is 108.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to NXL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to NXL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs RUL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RUL.AX has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RUL.AX trades at A$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RUL.AX's P/E ratio is 108.33. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to RUL.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to RUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs C79.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, C79.AX has a market cap of 578.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while C79.AX trades at A$4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas C79.AX's P/E ratio is -499.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to C79.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to C79.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs NTO.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, NTO.AX has a market cap of 559.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while NTO.AX trades at A$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NTO.AX's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to NTO.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to NTO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ELO.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ELO.AX has a market cap of 483.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ELO.AX trades at A$4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ELO.AX's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ELO.AX's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to ELO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs IFM.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, IFM.AX has a market cap of 481.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while IFM.AX trades at A$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IFM.AX's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to IFM.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to IFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs EOL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, EOL.AX has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while EOL.AX trades at A$14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas EOL.AX's P/E ratio is 100.07. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to EOL.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to EOL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs DSE.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, DSE.AX has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while DSE.AX trades at A$5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DSE.AX's P/E ratio is 588.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to DSE.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to DSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SPZ.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SPZ.AX has a market cap of 340.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SPZ.AX trades at A$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SPZ.AX's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPZ.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to SPZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs TSK.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TSK.AX has a market cap of 336.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TSK.AX trades at A$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TSK.AX's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to TSK.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to TSK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs RDY.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RDY.AX has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RDY.AX trades at A$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RDY.AX's P/E ratio is -18.85. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to RDY.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to RDY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs AND.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AND.AX has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AND.AX trades at A$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AND.AX's P/E ratio is -249.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to AND.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to AND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SYM.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SYM.AX has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SYM.AX trades at A$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SYM.AX's P/E ratio is 131.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SYM.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to SYM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs BTH.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BTH.AX has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BTH.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BTH.AX's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to BTH.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to BTH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs EIQ.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, EIQ.AX has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while EIQ.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas EIQ.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to EIQ.AX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to EIQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs YOJ.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, YOJ.AX has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while YOJ.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas YOJ.AX's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to YOJ.AX's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to YOJ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs HPG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, HPG.AX has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HPG.AX trades at A$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HPG.AX's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to HPG.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to HPG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs EVS.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, EVS.AX has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while EVS.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas EVS.AX's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to EVS.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to EVS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs LME.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, LME.AX has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LME.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LME.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to LME.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to LME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs MSL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, MSL.AX has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MSL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MSL.AX's P/E ratio is -49.17. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to MSL.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to MSL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs PTG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PTG.AX has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PTG.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PTG.AX's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to PTG.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to PTG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs IHR.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, IHR.AX has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while IHR.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IHR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to IHR.AX's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to IHR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs WSP.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WSP.AX has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while WSP.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas WSP.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to WSP.AX's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to WSP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs IRI.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, IRI.AX has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while IRI.AX trades at A$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IRI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to IRI.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to IRI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs VR1.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, VR1.AX has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while VR1.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VR1.AX's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to VR1.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to VR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs UBN.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, UBN.AX has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while UBN.AX trades at A$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas UBN.AX's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to UBN.AX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to UBN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs IOD.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, IOD.AX has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while IOD.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas IOD.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to IOD.AX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to IOD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ESK.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ESK.AX has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ESK.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ESK.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ESK.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to ESK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs DTC.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, DTC.AX has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while DTC.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DTC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to DTC.AX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to DTC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs AR9.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AR9.AX has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AR9.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AR9.AX's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to AR9.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to AR9.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs RKN.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RKN.AX has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RKN.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RKN.AX's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to RKN.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to RKN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs VIG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, VIG.AX has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while VIG.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VIG.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to VIG.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to VIG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs 3DP.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, 3DP.AX has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 3DP.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas 3DP.AX's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to 3DP.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to 3DP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs DUB.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, DUB.AX has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while DUB.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DUB.AX's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to DUB.AX's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to DUB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ICE.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ICE.AX has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ICE.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ICE.AX's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ICE.AX's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to ICE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs NVU.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, NVU.AX has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while NVU.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NVU.AX's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to NVU.AX's ROE of -4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to NVU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs JAN.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, JAN.AX has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while JAN.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas JAN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to JAN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to JAN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs FLX.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, FLX.AX has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while FLX.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FLX.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to FLX.AX's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to FLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs K2F.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, K2F.AX has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while K2F.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas K2F.AX's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to K2F.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to K2F.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ADA.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ADA.AX has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ADA.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ADA.AX's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ADA.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to ADA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs GTI.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GTI.AX has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while GTI.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GTI.AX's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to GTI.AX's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to GTI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs XF1.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, XF1.AX has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while XF1.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas XF1.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to XF1.AX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to XF1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs PRO.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PRO.AX has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PRO.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PRO.AX's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to PRO.AX's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to PRO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SNS.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SNS.AX has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SNS.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SNS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SNS.AX's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to SNS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs AHI.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AHI.AX has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AHI.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AHI.AX's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to AHI.AX's ROE of +5.95%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to AHI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs JXT.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, JXT.AX has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while JXT.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas JXT.AX's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to JXT.AX's ROE of -5.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to JXT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs CXZ.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, CXZ.AX has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CXZ.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CXZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to CXZ.AX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to CXZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs AMX.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AMX.AX has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AMX.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AMX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMX.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to AMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs LVH.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, LVH.AX has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LVH.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LVH.AX's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to LVH.AX's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to LVH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SCL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SCL.AX has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SCL.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SCL.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SCL.AX's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to SCL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs RCL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RCL.AX has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RCL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RCL.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to RCL.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to RCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs HTG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, HTG.AX has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HTG.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HTG.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to HTG.AX's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to HTG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs CF1.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, CF1.AX has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CF1.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CF1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to CF1.AX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to CF1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ROC.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ROC.AX has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ROC.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ROC.AX's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ROC.AX's ROE of +4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to ROC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs JCS.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, JCS.AX has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while JCS.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas JCS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to JCS.AX's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to JCS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs 1CG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, 1CG.AX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 1CG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas 1CG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to 1CG.AX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to 1CG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs Z2U.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, Z2U.AX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while Z2U.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas Z2U.AX's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to Z2U.AX's ROE of -23.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to Z2U.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs UNT.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, UNT.AX has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while UNT.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas UNT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to UNT.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to UNT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs CAG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, CAG.AX has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CAG.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CAG.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to CAG.AX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to CAG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs OLL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OLL.AX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while OLL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OLL.AX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to OLL.AX's ROE of +4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to OLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs OOK.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, OOK.AX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while OOK.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OOK.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to OOK.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to OOK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs MRI.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, MRI.AX has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MRI.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MRI.AX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to MRI.AX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to MRI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs KNM.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, KNM.AX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while KNM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KNM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to KNM.AX's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to KNM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs LVT.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, LVT.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LVT.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LVT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to LVT.AX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to LVT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs RLG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RLG.AX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RLG.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RLG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to RLG.AX's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to RLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs LNU.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, LNU.AX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LNU.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LNU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to LNU.AX's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to LNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SYT.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SYT.AX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SYT.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SYT.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SYT.AX's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to SYT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs AER.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AER.AX has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AER.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AER.AX's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to AER.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to AER.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs RC1.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, RC1.AX has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RC1.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RC1.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to RC1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to RC1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs TYM.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, TYM.AX has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TYM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TYM.AX's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to TYM.AX's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to TYM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs ID8.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, ID8.AX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ID8.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ID8.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to ID8.AX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to ID8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs WOO.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, WOO.AX has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while WOO.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas WOO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to WOO.AX's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to WOO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SIS.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SIS.AX has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SIS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SIS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SIS.AX's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to SIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs 8CO.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, 8CO.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 8CO.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas 8CO.AX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to 8CO.AX's ROE of -23.87%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to 8CO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs SMX.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, SMX.AX has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SMX.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SMX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to SMX.AX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to SMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs HAL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, HAL.AX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HAL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HAL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to HAL.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to HAL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs BGE.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BGE.AX has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BGE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BGE.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to BGE.AX's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to BGE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs DCL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, DCL.AX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while DCL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DCL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to DCL.AX's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to DCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs PHL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PHL.AX has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PHL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PHL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to PHL.AX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to PHL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs AO1.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, AO1.AX has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AO1.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas AO1.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to AO1.AX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to AO1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs 1TT.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, 1TT.AX has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 1TT.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas 1TT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to 1TT.AX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to 1TT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs GFN.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, GFN.AX has a market cap of 513.1K. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while GFN.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GFN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to GFN.AX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to GFN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs CWL.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, CWL.AX has a market cap of 277.5K. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CWL.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CWL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to CWL.AX's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is less volatile compared to CWL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs BID.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, BID.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BID.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BID.AX's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to BID.AX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to BID.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs CM8.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, CM8.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CM8.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CM8.AX's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to CM8.AX's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to CM8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs PYG.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, PYG.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PYG.AX trades at A$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PYG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to PYG.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to PYG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs 99L.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, 99L.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 99L.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas 99L.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to 99L.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to 99L.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.
OPA.AX vs MOQ.AX Comparison
OPA.AX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPA.AX stands at 3.8M. In comparison, MOQ.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPA.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MOQ.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MOQ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, OPA.AX's ROE is N/A, compared to MOQ.AX's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OPA.AX is more volatile compared to MOQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPA.AX.