Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OMI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMI | $2.68 | +8.94% | 207.1M | -0.47 | -$5.69 | N/A |
| MCK | $796.35 | -0.87% | 93.3B | 20.34 | $39.15 | +0.41% |
| COR | $296.57 | -1.89% | 57.7B | 17.79 | $16.67 | +0.78% |
| CAH | $224.94 | -2.25% | 52.7B | 21.57 | $10.43 | +0.90% |
| ABC | $179.98 | -0.23% | 36.1B | 21.92 | $8.21 | N/A |
| HSIC | $87.16 | +0.29% | 9.9B | 16.96 | $5.14 | N/A |
| PDCO | $31.33 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 20.48 | $1.53 | +2.49% |
| GRDN | $39.97 | +0.76% | 2.5B | 35.05 | $1.14 | N/A |
| PBH | $48.36 | +2.48% | 2.3B | 11.01 | $4.39 | N/A |
| ACH | $3.63 | +0.69% | 277.2M | 5.32 | $0.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OMI vs MCK Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, MCK has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while MCK trades at $796.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MCK's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to MCK's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to MCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check MCK's competition here
OMI vs COR Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, COR has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while COR trades at $296.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas COR's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to COR's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to COR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check COR's competition here
OMI vs CAH Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, CAH has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while CAH trades at $224.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CAH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to CAH's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to CAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check CAH's competition here
OMI vs ABC Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, ABC has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while ABC trades at $179.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ABC's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to ABC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to ABC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check ABC's competition here
OMI vs HSIC Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, HSIC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while HSIC trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HSIC's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to HSIC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to HSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check HSIC's competition here
OMI vs PDCO Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, PDCO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while PDCO trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PDCO's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to PDCO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to PDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check PDCO's competition here
OMI vs GRDN Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, GRDN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while GRDN trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GRDN's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to GRDN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to GRDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check GRDN's competition here
OMI vs PBH Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, PBH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while PBH trades at $48.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas PBH's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to PBH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to PBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check PBH's competition here
OMI vs ACH Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, ACH has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while ACH trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ACH's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to ACH's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to ACH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check ACH's competition here
OMI vs HX Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, HX has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while HX trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HX's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to HX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to HX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check HX's competition here
OMI vs WGRX Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, WGRX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while WGRX trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas WGRX's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to WGRX's ROE of +15.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to WGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check WGRX's competition here
OMI vs ZYXI Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, ZYXI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while ZYXI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZYXI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to ZYXI's ROE of +11.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to ZYXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check ZYXI's competition here
OMI vs SNYR Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, SNYR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while SNYR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SNYR's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to SNYR's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to SNYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check SNYR's competition here
OMI vs ZSTK Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, ZSTK has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while ZSTK trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZSTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to ZSTK's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is less volatile compared to ZSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check ZSTK's competition here
OMI vs RDGT Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, RDGT has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while RDGT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas RDGT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to RDGT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to RDGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check RDGT's competition here
OMI vs CVET Comparison July 2026
OMI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OMI stands at 207.1M. In comparison, CVET has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OMI is priced at $2.68, while CVET trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OMI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CVET's P/E ratio is -69.97. In terms of profitability, OMI's ROE is +2.65%, compared to CVET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OMI is more volatile compared to CVET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OMI.Check CVET's competition here