ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn
ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn Fundamental Analysis
ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn (OIOWW) shows weak financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of -2.28, profit margin of -10.38%, and ROE of -5.57%. The company generates $0.0B in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.
Key Strengths
Areas of Concern
The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of 4.0/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The F grade reflects weak fundamentals and significant financial concerns.
Fundamental Health Score
We analyze OIOWW's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:
Efficiency Score
WeakOIOWW struggles to generate sufficient returns from assets.
Valuation Score
ExcellentOIOWW trades at attractive valuation levels.
Growth Score
WeakOIOWW faces weak or negative growth trends.
Financial Health Score
ModerateOIOWW shows balanced financial health with some risks.
Profitability Score
WeakOIOWW struggles to sustain strong margins.
Key Financial Metrics
Is OIOWW Expensive or Cheap?
P/E Ratio
OIOWW trades at -2.28 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.
PEG Ratio
When adjusting for growth, OIOWW's PEG of 0.03 indicates potential undervaluation.
Price to Book
The market values ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn at 0.10 times its book value. This may indicate undervaluation.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise value stands at -1.81 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.
How Well Does OIOWW Make Money?
Net Profit Margin
For every $100 in sales, ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn keeps $-10.38 as profit after all expenses.
Operating Margin
Core operations generate -12.74 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.
ROE
Management delivers $-5.57 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.
ROA
ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn generates $-2.45 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.
Following the Money - Real Cash Generation
Operating Cash Flow
ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn generates limited operating cash flow of $-5.56M, signaling weaker underlying cash strength.
Free Cash Flow
ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn generates weak or negative free cash flow of $-6.05M, restricting financial flexibility.
FCF Per Share
Each share generates $-0.14 in free cash annually.
FCF Yield
OIOWW converts -1.63% of its market value into free cash.
Financial Ratios Analysis
Valuation Ratios
P/E Ratio
Price to earnings ratio
-2.28
vs 25 benchmark
PEG Ratio
Price/earnings to growth ratio
0.03
vs 25 benchmark
P/B Ratio
Price to book value ratio
0.10
vs 25 benchmark
P/S Ratio
Price to sales ratio
0.38
vs 25 benchmark
Financial Health
Debt/Equity
Total debt to shareholders' equity
0.44
vs 25 benchmark
Current Ratio
Current assets to current liabilities
0.23
vs 25 benchmark
Efficiency Ratios
ROE
Return on equity percentage
-0.06
vs 25 benchmark
ROA
Return on assets percentage
-0.02
vs 25 benchmark
ROCE
Return on capital employed
-0.05
vs 25 benchmark
How OIOWW Stacks Against Its Sector Peers
| Metric | OIOWW Value | Sector Average | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | -2.28 | 26.45 | Better (Cheaper) |
| ROE | -5.57% | 1289.00% | Weak |
| Net Margin | -10.38% | -41634.00% (disorted) | Weak |
| Debt/Equity | 0.44 | 0.71 | Strong (Low Leverage) |
| Current Ratio | 0.23 | 10.09 | Weak Liquidity |
| ROA | -2.45% | -1505238.00% (disorted) | Weak |
OIOWW outperforms its industry in 2 out of 6 key metrics, but lagging in ROE.
Historical Growth Performance
5-Year Growth Trajectory
This section reviews ESGL Holdings Limited Warrant -19.10.28 on Environ Sltn's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.
Revenue CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
EPS CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
FCF CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure