Oicintra, Inc.
Oicintra, Inc. OICT Peers
See (OICT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OICT | $10.53 | +4.13% | 5.8B | -35.93 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 50.6B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $19.70 | +0.64% | 14.3B | 102.16 | $0.19 | +3.78% |
| ANGPY | $7.43 | +1.36% | 11.8B | 29.92 | $0.25 | +8.62% |
| IMPUY | $9.02 | +4.40% | 8.1B | -8.42 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUF | $8.99 | +2.74% | 8.1B | -8.41 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $9.08 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 20.64 | $0.44 | +0.88% |
| GMINF | $12.98 | +4.01% | 2.9B | 24.95 | $0.52 | N/A |
| POYYF | $3.09 | +14.44% | 1.5B | -5.07 | -$0.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OICT vs AUXIF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs FNLPF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while FNLPF trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 102.16. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ANGPY Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ANGPY trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs IMPUY Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while IMPUY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs IMPUF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while IMPUF trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs NMPNF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs JINFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while JINFF trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GMINF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GMINF trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs POYYF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs AUCOY Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ZMPLF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ZMPLF trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ABBRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 493.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ABBRF trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -34.29. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GLGDF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GLGDF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs TPRFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SNNGF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 316.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SNNGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs TIHRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SAPLF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 253.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SAPLF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GOTRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GOTRF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs BRVMF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 218.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while BRVMF trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -72.67. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PLLHF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PLLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SLVTF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SLVTF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -31.76. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs BOCOF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while BOCOF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs BKRRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while BKRRF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs IAUFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while IAUFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs CTNXF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs XANAF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while XANAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PAASF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PAASF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SDRC Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SDRC trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -225.10. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ARRKF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ARRKF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs CHPGF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while CHPGF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs INMNF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs LUCRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while LUCRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs OCGSF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while OCGSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PDLMF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs VLMGF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while VLMGF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -57.58. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SMDRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SMDRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -26.78. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PDIV Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PDIV trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs MERG Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -16.99. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs CAPTF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while CAPTF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SSVFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SSVFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -16.73. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ORVMF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ORVMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs EMPYF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while EMPYF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 45.28. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs DNCVF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while DNCVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs BBBXF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while BBBXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs KDKCF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while KDKCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -16.87. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ELRFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ELRFF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs HEGLF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ACKRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ACKRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs DYNR Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while DYNR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs AGLDF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while AGLDF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs DNRSF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while DNRSF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs HMRRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs FCSUF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs TEUTF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while TEUTF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs EQMEF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while EQMEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs MMNGF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while MMNGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs VTXXF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while VTXXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs OKPRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SSVRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SSVRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SCTSF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SCTSF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs TLSMF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs TSORF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ACRG Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs FREDF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while FREDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ATEPF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ATEPF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs TBXXF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while TBXXF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ADYRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ADYRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GSMGF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GLDRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SHGDF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SMOFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SMOFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs NAUFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while NAUFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GMDMF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GMDMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs MRZLF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while MRZLF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs LGCXF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while LGCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PVGDF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PVGDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -16.19. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs HGLD Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while HGLD trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs NHAWF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NHAWF has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while NHAWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas NHAWF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHAWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to NHAWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs WAMFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while WAMFF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs CTMCF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while CTMCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs WEXPF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while WEXPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs AUCUF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs URVNF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs BRGC Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while BRGC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs EMPPF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while EMPPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs CJIMF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PNTRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PNTRF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -33.97. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs BYRG Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GBRRF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GBRRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs THMG Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while THMG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs AUSVF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs ESGLF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while ESGLF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs SEKZF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs PGLDF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while PGLDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs CNRIF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while CNRIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs GDPHF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GDPHF has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while GDPHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas GDPHF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDPHF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to GDPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs STRFF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while STRFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs RKHNF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while RKHNF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.
OICT vs MHTZF Comparison
OICT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OICT stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OICT is priced at $10.53, while MHTZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OICT currently has a P/E ratio of -35.93, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, OICT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OICT is more volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OICT.