Outcrop Silver & Gold Corporation
Outcrop Silver & Gold Corporation (OCGSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCGSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCGSF | $0.20 | -4.53% | 74.9M | -4.95 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 126B | 0.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FBSGF | $0.00 | +0.01% | 15.8B | -1.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $18.75 | -3.08% | 13.8B | 98.60 | $0.19 | +3.96% |
| ANGPY | $7.90 | -3.89% | 12.8B | 32.54 | $0.25 | +7.91% |
| IMPUF | $9.80 | -7.98% | 9.9B | -10.23 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $10.07 | -2.09% | 9.2B | -9.46 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.05 | +0.00% | 5.1B | -31.64 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.82 | -0.68% | 3.5B | 20.05 | $0.44 | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
OCGSF vs AUXIF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUXIF's competition here
OCGSF vs FBSGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FBSGF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while FBSGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas FBSGF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FBSGF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to FBSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check FBSGF's competition here
OCGSF vs FNLPF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while FNLPF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 98.60. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check FNLPF's competition here
OCGSF vs ANGPY Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ANGPY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ANGPY's competition here
OCGSF vs IMPUF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while IMPUF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check IMPUF's competition here
OCGSF vs IMPUY Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while IMPUY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check IMPUY's competition here
OCGSF vs OICT Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while OICT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -31.64. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check OICT's competition here
OCGSF vs NMPNF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check NMPNF's competition here
OCGSF vs JINFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while JINFF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check JINFF's competition here
OCGSF vs GMINF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while GMINF trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GMINF's competition here
OCGSF vs POYYF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check POYYF's competition here
OCGSF vs ZMPLF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ZMPLF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
OCGSF vs AUCOY Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUCOY's competition here
OCGSF vs GLGDF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while GLGDF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 157.20. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GLGDF's competition here
OCGSF vs ABBRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 507.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ABBRF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -35.27. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ABBRF's competition here
OCGSF vs TPRFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TPRFF's competition here
OCGSF vs SAPLF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SAPLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SAPLF's competition here
OCGSF vs TIHRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TIHRF's competition here
OCGSF vs GOTRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while GOTRF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GOTRF's competition here
OCGSF vs BRVMF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while BRVMF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -80.73. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BRVMF's competition here
OCGSF vs PLLHF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PLLHF's competition here
OCGSF vs SNNGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 173.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SNNGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SNNGF's competition here
OCGSF vs SLVTF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SLVTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SLVTF's competition here
OCGSF vs IAUFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while IAUFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check IAUFF's competition here
OCGSF vs XANAF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while XANAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check XANAF's competition here
OCGSF vs BKRRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while BKRRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BKRRF's competition here
OCGSF vs BOCOF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BOCOF's competition here
OCGSF vs SDRC Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SDRC trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SDRC's competition here
OCGSF vs HEGLF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while HEGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check HEGLF's competition here
OCGSF vs PDIV Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PDIV trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PDIV's competition here
OCGSF vs CTNXF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CTNXF's competition here
OCGSF vs LNXGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LNXGF has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while LNXGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas LNXGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to LNXGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to LNXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check LNXGF's competition here
OCGSF vs CHPGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while CHPGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CHPGF's competition here
OCGSF vs ARRKF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ARRKF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ARRKF's competition here
OCGSF vs PAASF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PAASF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PAASF's competition here
OCGSF vs VLMGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while VLMGF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -73.34. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VLMGF's competition here
OCGSF vs LUCRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while LUCRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check LUCRF's competition here
OCGSF vs INMNF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check INMNF's competition here
OCGSF vs EMPYF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while EMPYF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 64.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check EMPYF's competition here
OCGSF vs PDLMF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PDLMF's competition here
OCGSF vs ACRG Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ACRG's competition here
OCGSF vs CAPTF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while CAPTF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CAPTF's competition here
OCGSF vs SMDRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SMDRF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SMDRF's competition here
OCGSF vs DNCVF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while DNCVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -16.69. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DNCVF's competition here
OCGSF vs SSVFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SSVFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SSVFF's competition here
OCGSF vs MERG Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -16.99. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check MERG's competition here
OCGSF vs ORVMF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ORVMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ORVMF's competition here
OCGSF vs BRGC Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while BRGC trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BRGC's competition here
OCGSF vs ACKRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ACKRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ACKRF's competition here
OCGSF vs TSORF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TSORF's competition here
OCGSF vs BBBXF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while BBBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BBBXF's competition here
OCGSF vs DYNR Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while DYNR trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DYNR's competition here
OCGSF vs KDKCF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while KDKCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check KDKCF's competition here
OCGSF vs TEUTF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while TEUTF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TEUTF's competition here
OCGSF vs SSVRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SSVRF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -31.51. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SSVRF's competition here
OCGSF vs ELRFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ELRFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ELRFF's competition here
OCGSF vs WAMFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while WAMFF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check WAMFF's competition here
OCGSF vs HMRRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check HMRRF's competition here
OCGSF vs EQMEF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while EQMEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check EQMEF's competition here
OCGSF vs FCSUF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check FCSUF's competition here
OCGSF vs SCTSF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SCTSF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SCTSF's competition here
OCGSF vs TBXXF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while TBXXF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TBXXF's competition here
OCGSF vs VTXXF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VTXXF's competition here
OCGSF vs OKPRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check OKPRF's competition here
OCGSF vs SMOFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SMOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SMOFF's competition here
OCGSF vs ATEPF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ATEPF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ATEPF's competition here
OCGSF vs MMNGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while MMNGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check MMNGF's competition here
OCGSF vs NAUFF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while NAUFF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check NAUFF's competition here
OCGSF vs TLSMF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TLSMF's competition here
OCGSF vs VIPRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while VIPRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VIPRF's competition here
OCGSF vs DNRSF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while DNRSF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DNRSF's competition here
OCGSF vs FREDF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while FREDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check FREDF's competition here
OCGSF vs ADYRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ADYRF's competition here
OCGSF vs GSMGF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GSMGF's competition here
OCGSF vs GLDRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GLDRF's competition here
OCGSF vs AGLDF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AGLDF's competition here
OCGSF vs GBRRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GBRRF's competition here
OCGSF vs WEXPF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while WEXPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check WEXPF's competition here
OCGSF vs SHGDF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SHGDF's competition here
OCGSF vs MRZLF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while MRZLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check MRZLF's competition here
OCGSF vs AUCUF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUCUF's competition here
OCGSF vs KGFMF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while KGFMF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check KGFMF's competition here
OCGSF vs AGMRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while AGMRF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AGMRF's competition here
OCGSF vs URVNF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check URVNF's competition here
OCGSF vs LGCXF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while LGCXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check LGCXF's competition here
OCGSF vs THMG Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while THMG trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check THMG's competition here
OCGSF vs RKHNF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while RKHNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check RKHNF's competition here
OCGSF vs PVGDF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PVGDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PVGDF's competition here
OCGSF vs CJIMF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CJIMF's competition here
OCGSF vs CTMCF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while CTMCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CTMCF's competition here
OCGSF vs HGLD Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while HGLD trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check HGLD's competition here
OCGSF vs EMPPF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check EMPPF's competition here
OCGSF vs BYRG Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BYRG's competition here
OCGSF vs PNTRF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PNTRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PNTRF's competition here
OCGSF vs AUSVF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUSVF's competition here
OCGSF vs SEKZF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SEKZF's competition here
OCGSF vs CNRIF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while CNRIF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CNRIF's competition here
OCGSF vs PGLDF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while PGLDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PGLDF's competition here
OCGSF vs ESGLF Comparison July 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.20, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.77%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ESGLF's competition here