Outcrop Silver & Gold Corporation
Outcrop Silver & Gold Corporation (OCGSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCGSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCGSF | $0.21 | +2.46% | 78.2M | -5.16 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 50.2B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $22.75 | +0.95% | 16.7B | 36.61 | $0.62 | +3.91% |
| ANGPY | $8.08 | -0.12% | 12.8B | 162.00 | $0.05 | +8.07% |
| IMPUF | $9.45 | +0.00% | 8.5B | -8.83 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $9.34 | +0.43% | 8.4B | -8.74 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.05 | +0.00% | 5.5B | -34.30 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| JINFF | $11.20 | -0.66% | 4.4B | 15.14 | $0.74 | +0.71% |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| GMINF | $14.78 | +2.39% | 3.3B | 18.94 | $0.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OCGSF vs AUXIF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUXIF's competition here
OCGSF vs FNLPF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while FNLPF trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check FNLPF's competition here
OCGSF vs ANGPY Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ANGPY trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 162.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ANGPY's competition here
OCGSF vs IMPUF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while IMPUF trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check IMPUF's competition here
OCGSF vs IMPUY Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while IMPUY trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check IMPUY's competition here
OCGSF vs OICT Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while OICT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.30. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check OICT's competition here
OCGSF vs JINFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while JINFF trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check JINFF's competition here
OCGSF vs NMPNF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check NMPNF's competition here
OCGSF vs GMINF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while GMINF trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GMINF's competition here
OCGSF vs POYYF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check POYYF's competition here
OCGSF vs ZMPLF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ZMPLF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
OCGSF vs AUCOY Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUCOY's competition here
OCGSF vs ABBRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 587.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ABBRF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -40.82. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ABBRF's competition here
OCGSF vs GLGDF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while GLGDF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GLGDF's competition here
OCGSF vs TPRFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TPRFF's competition here
OCGSF vs GOTRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while GOTRF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GOTRF's competition here
OCGSF vs SAPLF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 258.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SAPLF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SAPLF's competition here
OCGSF vs TIHRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TIHRF's competition here
OCGSF vs BRVMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while BRVMF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -74.67. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BRVMF's competition here
OCGSF vs SLVTF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SLVTF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -47.31. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SLVTF's competition here
OCGSF vs PLLHF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PLLHF's competition here
OCGSF vs IAUFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while IAUFF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check IAUFF's competition here
OCGSF vs SDRC Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 145M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SDRC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -387.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SDRC's competition here
OCGSF vs BKRRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while BKRRF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BKRRF's competition here
OCGSF vs BOCOF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BOCOF's competition here
OCGSF vs XANAF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check XANAF's competition here
OCGSF vs PDIV Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PDIV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PDIV's competition here
OCGSF vs PAASF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PAASF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PAASF's competition here
OCGSF vs CTNXF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CTNXF's competition here
OCGSF vs CAPTF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while CAPTF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -46.46. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CAPTF's competition here
OCGSF vs BRGC Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while BRGC trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BRGC's competition here
OCGSF vs HEGLF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while HEGLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check HEGLF's competition here
OCGSF vs SMDRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SMDRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -30.21. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SMDRF's competition here
OCGSF vs CHPGF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while CHPGF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -42.67. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CHPGF's competition here
OCGSF vs EMPYF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while EMPYF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check EMPYF's competition here
OCGSF vs INMNF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check INMNF's competition here
OCGSF vs LUCRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while LUCRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check LUCRF's competition here
OCGSF vs ARRKF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ARRKF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -19.01. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ARRKF's competition here
OCGSF vs PDLMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PDLMF's competition here
OCGSF vs VLMGF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while VLMGF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -58.18. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VLMGF's competition here
OCGSF vs SSVFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SSVFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -16.06. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SSVFF's competition here
OCGSF vs DNCVF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while DNCVF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DNCVF's competition here
OCGSF vs ORVMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ORVMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ORVMF's competition here
OCGSF vs SNNGF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SNNGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +7.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SNNGF's competition here
OCGSF vs TBXXF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while TBXXF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TBXXF's competition here
OCGSF vs ADYRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ADYRF's competition here
OCGSF vs ACKRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ACKRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ACKRF's competition here
OCGSF vs SCTSF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SCTSF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SCTSF's competition here
OCGSF vs TEUTF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while TEUTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TEUTF's competition here
OCGSF vs SSVRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SSVRF's competition here
OCGSF vs KDKCF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while KDKCF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -14.35. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check KDKCF's competition here
OCGSF vs DMIFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, DMIFF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while DMIFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas DMIFF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DMIFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to DMIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DMIFF's competition here
OCGSF vs WAMFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while WAMFF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check WAMFF's competition here
OCGSF vs TSORF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TSORF's competition here
OCGSF vs HMRRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check HMRRF's competition here
OCGSF vs FCSUF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check FCSUF's competition here
OCGSF vs AGMRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while AGMRF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AGMRF's competition here
OCGSF vs VTXXF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VTXXF's competition here
OCGSF vs OKPRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check OKPRF's competition here
OCGSF vs DYNR Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while DYNR trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DYNR's competition here
OCGSF vs SHGDF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SHGDF's competition here
OCGSF vs BBBXF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while BBBXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BBBXF's competition here
OCGSF vs TLSMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check TLSMF's competition here
OCGSF vs KGFMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while KGFMF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check KGFMF's competition here
OCGSF vs ACRG Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ACRG's competition here
OCGSF vs DNRSF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while DNRSF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check DNRSF's competition here
OCGSF vs SMOFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SMOFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.87%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SMOFF's competition here
OCGSF vs EQMEF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while EQMEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check EQMEF's competition here
OCGSF vs AGLDF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while AGLDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AGLDF's competition here
OCGSF vs ELRFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ELRFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ELRFF's competition here
OCGSF vs ATEPF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ATEPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -26.19. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ATEPF's competition here
OCGSF vs EMPPF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while EMPPF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check EMPPF's competition here
OCGSF vs MMNGF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while MMNGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check MMNGF's competition here
OCGSF vs GLDRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GLDRF's competition here
OCGSF vs WEXPF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while WEXPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check WEXPF's competition here
OCGSF vs VIPRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while VIPRF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VIPRF's competition here
OCGSF vs THMG Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while THMG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to THMG's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check THMG's competition here
OCGSF vs PNTRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PNTRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -40.80. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PNTRF's competition here
OCGSF vs GBRRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while GBRRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GBRRF's competition here
OCGSF vs ASLRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ASLRF's competition here
OCGSF vs NAUFF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while NAUFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check NAUFF's competition here
OCGSF vs RITE Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while RITE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check RITE's competition here
OCGSF vs MRZLF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while MRZLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check MRZLF's competition here
OCGSF vs LGCXF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while LGCXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check LGCXF's competition here
OCGSF vs CTMCF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while CTMCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CTMCF's competition here
OCGSF vs URVNF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check URVNF's competition here
OCGSF vs MERG Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check MERG's competition here
OCGSF vs GMDMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, GMDMF has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while GMDMF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas GMDMF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GMDMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to GMDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check GMDMF's competition here
OCGSF vs AUCUF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while AUCUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUCUF's competition here
OCGSF vs PGLDF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PGLDF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PGLDF's competition here
OCGSF vs VOYRF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check VOYRF's competition here
OCGSF vs SBMCF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SBMCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SBMCF's competition here
OCGSF vs CJIMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check CJIMF's competition here
OCGSF vs AUSVF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check AUSVF's competition here
OCGSF vs PVGDF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while PVGDF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check PVGDF's competition here
OCGSF vs SEKZF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check SEKZF's competition here
OCGSF vs BYRG Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check BYRG's competition here
OCGSF vs ESGLF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while ESGLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check ESGLF's competition here
OCGSF vs LBCMF Comparison August 2025
OCGSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCGSF stands at 78.2M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCGSF is priced at $0.21, while LBCMF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCGSF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.16, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, OCGSF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OCGSF is more volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCGSF.Check LBCMF's competition here