OceanaGold Corporation
OceanaGold Corporation OCANF Peers
See (OCANF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCANF | $14.15 | -4.65% | 9.9B | 34.51 | $0.41 | +0.21% |
| ZIJMF | $2.46 | -1.20% | 67.9B | 12.95 | $0.19 | +2.15% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +910.73% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $11.65 | -9.69% | 19.4B | 25.63 | $0.53 | +2.40% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $53.26 | +3.16% | 12.8B | 23.84 | $2.22 | +2.93% |
| CAHPF | $4.90 | -1.29% | 9.7B | 21.28 | $0.23 | +1.88% |
Stock Comparison
OCANF vs ZIJMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ZIJMF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs OPYGY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs GFIOF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs NESRF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while NESRF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs NSTYY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs NCMGY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs NCMGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs LUGDF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while LUGDF trades at $53.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs CAHPF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while CAHPF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs HGMCF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ZHAOF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs AULGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs EDVMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while EDVMF trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -73.52. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs SBYSF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while SBYSF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ARGTF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ARGTF trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -256.96. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs DGMLF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ZIJMY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ZIJMY trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs GSISF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while GSISF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 40.79. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs PMNXF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while PMNXF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs GRLGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs CRNLF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while CRNLF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 50.31. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs TORXF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while TORXF trades at $32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs KNTNF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while KNTNF trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs DPMLF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while DPMLF trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RGRNF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RGRNF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -310.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs CELTF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs WDOFF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while WDOFF trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ORAAF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ORAAF trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs KOZAY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ELKMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ELKMF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs REDLF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs EOGSF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while EOGSF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs CXBMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RMLRF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RMLRF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs HCHDF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while HCHDF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs WFRSF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while WFRSF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs DRDGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs OBNNF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs PAFRF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MWSNF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MWSNF trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -96.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MAUTF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MAUTF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.91. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs AURQF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs SNWGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 981M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while SNWGF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -43.57. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs HCHDY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs SVLKF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs SGSVF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs KRRGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs BELGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 856.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while BELGF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RMGGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 855M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RMGGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -40.16. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RUPRF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 828.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RUPRF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -177.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs PDIYF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 739M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while PDIYF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -28.20. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs WTGRF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RGDFF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RMGGY Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ASGOF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 563.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ASGOF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MNSAF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 554.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MNSAF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs NVMLF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs GUYGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while GUYGF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -69.37. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs OSKA Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RMLFF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 472.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RMLFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RSRBF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 468.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RSRBF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 81.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ARNGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ORZCF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 456.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ORZCF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ECRTF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 433.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ECRTF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs RIOFF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 427.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while RIOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 100.65. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs LMGDF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs THXPF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 383.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while THXPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs KSKGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs PROBF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 349.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while PROBF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs TPRXF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MNDJF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 337M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MNDJF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ELEMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ELEMF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 65.95. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MAKOF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MAKOF trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ALKEF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 302.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ALKEF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs OGNRF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while OGNRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 139.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs FDMIF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while FDMIF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MGDPF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs OSIIF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs ERRSF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs OMGGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 246.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while OMGGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.05. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs GDRZF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while GDRZF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs STPGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while STPGF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs STBMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs WRLGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while WRLGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs HSTXF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while HSTXF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs JAGGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while JAGGF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -31.37. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs AGXKF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs SAAGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs CNLMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs SRBIF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while SRBIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs DCCNF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs CNMXF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs THSGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while THSGF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs LECBF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is less volatile compared to LECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs EEYMF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs FFMGF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while FFMGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -14.14. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs GGAZF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while GGAZF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs NVOOF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.
OCANF vs MAIFF Comparison
OCANF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCANF stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCANF is priced at $14.15, while MAIFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCANF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, OCANF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OCANF is more volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCANF.