Naked Wines plc
Naked Wines plc (NWINF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWINF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWINF | $0.85 | -6.08% | 62.9M | -3.04 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| DGEAF | $24.69 | -6.34% | 54.9B | 15.34 | $1.61 | +4.21% |
| PDRDF | $109.94 | +1.34% | 27.7B | 21.43 | $5.13 | +4.67% |
| PRNDY | $20.75 | -3.71% | 26.1B | 20.34 | $1.02 | +4.33% |
| TBVPY | $36.94 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 10.49 | $3.52 | +4.99% |
| DVCMY | $7.16 | -1.38% | 8.6B | 44.75 | $0.16 | +1.15% |
| TBVPF | $0.34 | -4.76% | 8.5B | 8.50 | $0.04 | +5.43% |
| DVDCF | $7.06 | -5.23% | 8.5B | 44.13 | $0.16 | +1.05% |
| EDVGF | $2.71 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 15.94 | $0.17 | +4.88% |
| BCCLF | $1.28 | -8.57% | 4.6B | 21.33 | $0.06 | +2.91% |
Stock Comparison
NWINF vs DGEAF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DGEAF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check DGEAF's competition here
NWINF vs PDRDF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while PDRDF trades at $109.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check PDRDF's competition here
NWINF vs PRNDY Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while PRNDY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check PRNDY's competition here
NWINF vs TBVPY Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while TBVPY trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check TBVPY's competition here
NWINF vs DVCMY Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DVCMY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check DVCMY's competition here
NWINF vs TBVPF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, TBVPF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while TBVPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas TBVPF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TBVPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and TBVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBVPF's competition here
NWINF vs DVDCF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DVDCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check DVDCF's competition here
NWINF vs EDVGF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while EDVGF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and EDVGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDVGF's competition here
NWINF vs BCCLF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while BCCLF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check BCCLF's competition here
NWINF vs TSRYF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while TSRYF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and TSRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSRYF's competition here
NWINF vs TSRYY Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while TSRYY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check TSRYY's competition here
NWINF vs REMYF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while REMYF trades at $61.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and REMYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REMYF's competition here
NWINF vs REMYY Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while REMYY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check REMYY's competition here
NWINF vs DSTZF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and DSTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSTZF's competition here
NWINF vs LPRRF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and LPRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPRRF's competition here
NWINF vs GBSMF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and GBSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBSMF's competition here
NWINF vs CRBBF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while CRBBF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check CRBBF's competition here
NWINF vs CBYDF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while CBYDF trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to CBYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check CBYDF's competition here
NWINF vs BVDRF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and BVDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVDRF's competition here
NWINF vs ADWPF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while ADWPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and ADWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADWPF's competition here
NWINF vs SBES Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and SBES have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBES's competition here
NWINF vs CWGL Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while CWGL trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and CWGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWGL's competition here
NWINF vs MJWNY Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while MJWNY trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check MJWNY's competition here
NWINF vs LRKKF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check LRKKF's competition here
NWINF vs AUVGF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while AUVGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check AUVGF's competition here
NWINF vs CATWF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and CATWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CATWF's competition here
NWINF vs VDKB Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while VDKB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and VDKB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDKB's competition here
NWINF vs DWWEF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DWWEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check DWWEF's competition here
NWINF vs SLLFF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check SLLFF's competition here
NWINF vs TNYBF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +16.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check TNYBF's competition here
NWINF vs SVIN Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while SVIN trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check SVIN's competition here
NWINF vs THST Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and THST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THST's competition here
NWINF vs RSAU Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while RSAU trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -28.49. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check RSAU's competition here
NWINF vs IFBC Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, IFBC has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while IFBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas IFBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IFBC's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to IFBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check IFBC's competition here
NWINF vs EWRC Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check EWRC's competition here
NWINF vs ASCC Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while ASCC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check ASCC's competition here
NWINF vs SRSG Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 449.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while SRSG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and SRSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRSG's competition here
NWINF vs SHNJF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 324K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and SHNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHNJF's competition here
NWINF vs DKAM Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 278.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check DKAM's competition here
NWINF vs MLMN Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 208.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and MLMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLMN's competition here
NWINF vs SBDCF Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check SBDCF's competition here
NWINF vs TGRR Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check TGRR's competition here
NWINF vs ICNB Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 54K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check ICNB's competition here
NWINF vs DKTS Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 42.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DKTS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWINF.Check DKTS's competition here
NWINF vs FPWM Comparison July 2025
NWINF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWINF stands at 62.9M. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, NWINF is priced at $0.85, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWINF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.04, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NWINF's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NWINF and FPWM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPWM's competition here