New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Limited
New Focus Auto Tech Holdings Limited (NWFAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWFAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWFAF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 37.9M | -0.22 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.81 | -22.32% | 75.7B | 15.08 | $0.12 | +3.40% |
| DNZOY | $14.51 | -0.78% | 41.4B | 14.80 | $0.98 | +1.64% |
| DNZOF | $14.42 | -1.17% | 39.7B | 14.71 | $0.98 | +3.00% |
| BRDCY | $22.89 | -0.04% | 31.3B | 22.95 | $1.00 | +1.93% |
| MGDDF | $38.88 | +3.21% | 27.4B | 3.48 | $11.17 | +4.01% |
| BRDCF | $41.00 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 20.50 | $2.00 | +5.20% |
| MGDDY | $18.42 | -2.64% | 26B | 8.26 | $2.23 | +4.09% |
| SMTOY | $27.34 | -0.35% | 21.4B | 16.21 | $1.69 | +1.37% |
| CTTAF | $87.08 | -4.07% | 18.1B | 13.93 | $6.49 | +3.24% |
Stock Comparison
NWFAF vs FYGGY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while FYGGY trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check FYGGY's competition here
NWFAF vs DNZOY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while DNZOY trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check DNZOY's competition here
NWFAF vs DNZOF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while DNZOF trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check DNZOF's competition here
NWFAF vs BRDCY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while BRDCY trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check BRDCY's competition here
NWFAF vs MGDDF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MGDDF trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check MGDDF's competition here
NWFAF vs BRDCF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while BRDCF trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and BRDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRDCF's competition here
NWFAF vs MGDDY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MGDDY trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check MGDDY's competition here
NWFAF vs SMTOY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SMTOY trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check SMTOY's competition here
NWFAF vs CTTAF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CTTAF trades at $87.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check CTTAF's competition here
NWFAF vs CTTAY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CTTAY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check CTTAY's competition here
NWFAF vs KNRRY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while KNRRY trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check KNRRY's competition here
NWFAF vs KNBHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while KNBHF trades at $100.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check KNBHF's competition here
NWFAF vs PTAIY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while PTAIY trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check PTAIY's competition here
NWFAF vs PTAIF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while PTAIF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and PTAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTAIF's competition here
NWFAF vs ASEKY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ASEKY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check ASEKY's competition here
NWFAF vs HLLGY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while HLLGY trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and HLLGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLLGY's competition here
NWFAF vs HLKHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check HLKHF's competition here
NWFAF vs ASEKF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASEKF's competition here
NWFAF vs NGKSY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NGKSY trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGKSY's competition here
NWFAF vs PLLIF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while PLLIF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and PLLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLIF's competition here
NWFAF vs NGKSF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NGKSF's competition here
NWFAF vs SFFLY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SFFLY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and SFFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFFLY's competition here
NWFAF vs MNTHY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MNTHY trades at $88.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check MNTHY's competition here
NWFAF vs MNTHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MNTHF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and MNTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNTHF's competition here
NWFAF vs YORUY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while YORUY trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and YORUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YORUY's competition here
NWFAF vs KOTMY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while KOTMY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check KOTMY's competition here
NWFAF vs YORUF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YORUF's competition here
NWFAF vs BRBOY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check BRBOY's competition here
NWFAF vs SCFLF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check SCFLF's competition here
NWFAF vs STAEY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while STAEY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check STAEY's competition here
NWFAF vs JEHLY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while JEHLY trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JEHLY's competition here
NWFAF vs KOTMF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check KOTMF's competition here
NWFAF vs BRBOF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while BRBOF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check BRBOF's competition here
NWFAF vs LIMAF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while LIMAF trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and LIMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIMAF's competition here
NWFAF vs SMTUF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SMTUF trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -31.91. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check SMTUF's competition here
NWFAF vs VLEEY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while VLEEY trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check VLEEY's competition here
NWFAF vs STAEF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STAEF's competition here
NWFAF vs VLEEF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while VLEEF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check VLEEF's competition here
NWFAF vs FURCF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while FURCF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FURCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and FURCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FURCF's competition here
NWFAF vs JELCF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while JELCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check JELCF's competition here
NWFAF vs NPSKY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NPSKY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and NPSKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPSKY's competition here
NWFAF vs NHKGF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NHKGF's competition here
NWFAF vs TGOSY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while TGOSY trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check TGOSY's competition here
NWFAF vs TDBOF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check TDBOF's competition here
NWFAF vs NIFCY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NIFCY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIFCY's competition here
NWFAF vs VTSCF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTSCF's competition here
NWFAF vs NTXVF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NTXVF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and NTXVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTXVF's competition here
NWFAF vs NPSKF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NPSKF's competition here
NWFAF vs ARBFF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check ARBFF's competition here
NWFAF vs MBUMY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check MBUMY's competition here
NWFAF vs MBUMF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check MBUMF's competition here
NWFAF vs GMPUF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMPUF's competition here
NWFAF vs UNIEF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check UNIEF's competition here
NWFAF vs FAURY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while FAURY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check FAURY's competition here
NWFAF vs PASTF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while PASTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check PASTF's competition here
NWFAF vs NKRKY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NKRKY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -32.13. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NKRKY's competition here
NWFAF vs NKRKF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NKRKF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -29.03. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and NKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NKRKF's competition here
NWFAF vs TIANF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check TIANF's competition here
NWFAF vs SFHLF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check SFHLF's competition here
NWFAF vs GUDDY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 796M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and GUDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUDDY's competition here
NWFAF vs ATNNF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 777M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check ATNNF's competition here
NWFAF vs ABDDF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABDDF's competition here
NWFAF vs GUDHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 692.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check GUDHF's competition here
NWFAF vs FCVFF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCVFF's competition here
NWFAF vs NMAKF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NMAKF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NMAKF's competition here
NWFAF vs MRETF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 491.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while MRETF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and MRETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRETF's competition here
NWFAF vs IOCJY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while IOCJY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check IOCJY's competition here
NWFAF vs TCISF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCISF's competition here
NWFAF vs SAEOF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAEOF's competition here
NWFAF vs VTSCY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTSCY's competition here
NWFAF vs PWRHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check PWRHF's competition here
NWFAF vs NPSGF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NPSGF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NPSGF's competition here
NWFAF vs EGKLF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while EGKLF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and EGKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGKLF's competition here
NWFAF vs ELLRY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 295.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELLRY's competition here
NWFAF vs NPSGY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NPSGY's competition here
NWFAF vs XNGIF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check XNGIF's competition here
NWFAF vs WLMTF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 241.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while WLMTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLMTF's competition here
NWFAF vs AKBIF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check AKBIF's competition here
NWFAF vs AMGRF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while AMGRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check AMGRF's competition here
NWFAF vs EXCOF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while EXCOF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and EXCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXCOF's competition here
NWFAF vs SCTH Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SCTH trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SCTH's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTH's competition here
NWFAF vs HWAFF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWAFF's competition here
NWFAF vs KGAUF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while KGAUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check KGAUF's competition here
NWFAF vs FESTF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while FESTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check FESTF's competition here
NWFAF vs LEAT Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while LEAT trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is 44.17. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LEAT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check LEAT's competition here
NWFAF vs CAOHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOHF's competition here
NWFAF vs CCEGF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CCEGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and CCEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCEGF's competition here
NWFAF vs NFGRF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check NFGRF's competition here
NWFAF vs STSGF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STSGF's competition here
NWFAF vs VOAXF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOAXF's competition here
NWFAF vs CREVF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CREVF's competition here
NWFAF vs CMMCF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CMMCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check CMMCF's competition here
NWFAF vs CDTI Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while CDTI trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check CDTI's competition here
NWFAF vs ATHHF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check ATHHF's competition here
NWFAF vs AFFL Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while AFFL trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check AFFL's competition here
NWFAF vs UFMG Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UFMG's competition here
NWFAF vs AMTY Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check AMTY's competition here
NWFAF vs OPTI Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check OPTI's competition here
NWFAF vs SPKTF Comparison August 2025
NWFAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWFAF stands at 37.9M. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWFAF is priced at $0.00, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWFAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NWFAF's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWFAF is less volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWFAF.Check SPKTF's competition here