Newfield Resources Limited
Newfield Resources Limited (NWF.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWF.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWF.AX | A$0.09 | +0.00% | 83.7M | -0.56 | -A$0.16 | N/A |
| ZIM.AX | A$17.45 | -2.51% | 1.9B | 7.18 | A$2.43 | N/A |
| MI6.AX | A$0.68 | -2.17% | 1.5B | -33.75 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| BRE.AX | A$4.12 | -8.04% | 1.1B | -24.24 | -A$0.17 | N/A |
| SYS.AX | A$17.00 | -0.02% | 1B | -2833.33 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| LRV.AX | A$1.04 | -5.45% | 538.9M | -26.00 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| 29M.AX | A$0.36 | -2.74% | 485.9M | 17.75 | A$0.02 | N/A |
| STK.AX | A$0.21 | +0.00% | 451.3M | 20.50 | A$0.01 | N/A |
| SMI.AX | A$0.68 | -5.59% | 433.2M | -67.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| A1M.AX | A$0.54 | -1.82% | 430.7M | 18.00 | A$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NWF.AX vs ZIM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ZIM.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ZIM.AX trades at A$17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ZIM.AX's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ZIM.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to ZIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ZIM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MI6.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MI6.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MI6.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MI6.AX's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MI6.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MI6.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MI6.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BRE.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BRE.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BRE.AX trades at A$4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BRE.AX's P/E ratio is -24.24. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BRE.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BRE.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SYS.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SYS.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SYS.AX trades at A$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SYS.AX's P/E ratio is -2833.33. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SYS.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to SYS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SYS.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs LRV.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, LRV.AX has a market cap of 538.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LRV.AX trades at A$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LRV.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LRV.AX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to LRV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check LRV.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs 29M.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, 29M.AX has a market cap of 485.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while 29M.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas 29M.AX's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to 29M.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to 29M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check 29M.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs STK.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, STK.AX has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while STK.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas STK.AX's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to STK.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to STK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check STK.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SMI.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SMI.AX has a market cap of 433.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SMI.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SMI.AX's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SMI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to SMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SMI.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs A1M.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, A1M.AX has a market cap of 430.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while A1M.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas A1M.AX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to A1M.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to A1M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check A1M.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MTM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MTM.AX has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MTM.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MTM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MTM.AX's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MTM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs AZY.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, AZY.AX has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while AZY.AX trades at A$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AZY.AX's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to AZY.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to AZY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check AZY.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs TOK.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, TOK.AX has a market cap of 314.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TOK.AX trades at A$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TOK.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TOK.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to TOK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check TOK.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs CEL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, CEL.AX has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CEL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CEL.AX's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CEL.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to CEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check CEL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BOC.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BOC.AX has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BOC.AX trades at A$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BOC.AX's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BOC.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BOC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BOC.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MM8.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MM8.AX has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MM8.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MM8.AX's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MM8.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MM8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MM8.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs TM1.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, TM1.AX has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TM1.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TM1.AX's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TM1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to TM1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check TM1.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs FRS.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, FRS.AX has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FRS.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FRS.AX's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to FRS.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to FRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check FRS.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs XAM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, XAM.AX has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while XAM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas XAM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to XAM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to XAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check XAM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SPD.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SPD.AX has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SPD.AX trades at A$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SPD.AX's P/E ratio is -24.42. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SPD.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to SPD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SPD.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PUA.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PUA.AX has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PUA.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PUA.AX's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PUA.AX's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to PUA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PUA.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MM1.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MM1.AX has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MM1.AX trades at A$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MM1.AX's P/E ratio is -40.25. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MM1.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MM1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MM1.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MPK.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MPK.AX has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MPK.AX trades at A$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MPK.AX's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MPK.AX's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MPK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MPK.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs G50.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, G50.AX has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while G50.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas G50.AX's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to G50.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to G50.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check G50.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs CNB.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, CNB.AX has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CNB.AX trades at A$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CNB.AX's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CNB.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to CNB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check CNB.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs AGD.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, AGD.AX has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while AGD.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AGD.AX's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to AGD.AX's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to AGD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check AGD.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs ANS.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ANS.AX has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ANS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ANS.AX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ANS.AX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to ANS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ANS.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MKR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MKR.AX has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MKR.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MKR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MKR.AX's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to MKR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MKR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs OSM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, OSM.AX has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while OSM.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OSM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to OSM.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to OSM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check OSM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MMA.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MMA.AX has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MMA.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MMA.AX's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MMA.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to MMA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MMA.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs FEG.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, FEG.AX has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FEG.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FEG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to FEG.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to FEG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check FEG.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs FTL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, FTL.AX has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FTL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FTL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to FTL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to FTL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check FTL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SDL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SDL.AX has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SDL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SDL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SDL.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to SDL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SDL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs LKY.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, LKY.AX has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LKY.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LKY.AX's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LKY.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to LKY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check LKY.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PTR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PTR.AX has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PTR.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PTR.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PTR.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to PTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PTR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs RIM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, RIM.AX has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RIM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RIM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RIM.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to RIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check RIM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs ODE.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ODE.AX has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ODE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ODE.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ODE.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to ODE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ODE.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BMR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BMR.AX has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BMR.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BMR.AX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BMR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BMR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs HAR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, HAR.AX has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while HAR.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HAR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to HAR.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to HAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check HAR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs E2M.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, E2M.AX has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while E2M.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas E2M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to E2M.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to E2M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check E2M.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MXR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MXR.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MXR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MXR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MXR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MXR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MXR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs QML.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, QML.AX has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while QML.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas QML.AX's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to QML.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to QML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check QML.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs CAE.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, CAE.AX has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CAE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CAE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CAE.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to CAE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check CAE.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs GSN.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, GSN.AX has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while GSN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GSN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GSN.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to GSN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check GSN.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs HMX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, HMX.AX has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while HMX.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HMX.AX's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to HMX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to HMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check HMX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs TSK.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, TSK.AX has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TSK.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TSK.AX's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TSK.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to TSK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check TSK.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs LDR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, LDR.AX has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LDR.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LDR.AX's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LDR.AX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to LDR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check LDR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs GGR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, GGR.AX has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while GGR.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GGR.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GGR.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to GGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check GGR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BDM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BDM.AX has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BDM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BDM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BDM.AX's ROE of +5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to BDM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BDM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PNX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PNX.AX has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PNX.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PNX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PNX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to PNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PNX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BHM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BHM.AX has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BHM.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BHM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BHM.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to BHM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BHM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs C1X.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, C1X.AX has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while C1X.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas C1X.AX's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to C1X.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to C1X.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check C1X.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs IDA.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, IDA.AX has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while IDA.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas IDA.AX's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IDA.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to IDA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check IDA.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs ERL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ERL.AX has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ERL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ERL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ERL.AX's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to ERL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ERL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BPM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BPM.AX has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BPM.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BPM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BPM.AX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BPM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SCN.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SCN.AX has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SCN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SCN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SCN.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to SCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SCN.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs FME.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, FME.AX has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FME.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas FME.AX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to FME.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to FME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check FME.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs TAR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, TAR.AX has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TAR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TAR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TAR.AX's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to TAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check TAR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PGM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PGM.AX has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PGM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PGM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PGM.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to PGM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PGM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs RDN.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, RDN.AX has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RDN.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RDN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RDN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to RDN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check RDN.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs TLM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, TLM.AX has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TLM.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TLM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TLM.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to TLM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check TLM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MHC.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MHC.AX has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MHC.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MHC.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MHC.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MHC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MHC.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs XPD.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, XPD.AX has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while XPD.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas XPD.AX's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to XPD.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to XPD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check XPD.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BRX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BRX.AX has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BRX.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BRX.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BRX.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BRX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs KOB.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, KOB.AX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while KOB.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas KOB.AX's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to KOB.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to KOB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check KOB.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs GIB.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, GIB.AX has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while GIB.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GIB.AX's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GIB.AX's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to GIB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check GIB.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs OMX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, OMX.AX has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while OMX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas OMX.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to OMX.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to OMX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check OMX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs T88.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, T88.AX has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while T88.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas T88.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to T88.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to T88.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check T88.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs HWK.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, HWK.AX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while HWK.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas HWK.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to HWK.AX's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to HWK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check HWK.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs ERE.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ERE.AX has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ERE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ERE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ERE.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to ERE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ERE.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs RB6.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, RB6.AX has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RB6.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RB6.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RB6.AX's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to RB6.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check RB6.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SLA.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SLA.AX has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SLA.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SLA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SLA.AX's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to SLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SLA.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MPG.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MPG.AX has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MPG.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MPG.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MPG.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MPG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MPG.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs GRL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, GRL.AX has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while GRL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas GRL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GRL.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to GRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check GRL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs LCL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, LCL.AX has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LCL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LCL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LCL.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to LCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check LCL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs DUN.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, DUN.AX has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while DUN.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas DUN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DUN.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to DUN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check DUN.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs LYN.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, LYN.AX has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LYN.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LYN.AX's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LYN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to LYN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check LYN.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PKO.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PKO.AX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PKO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PKO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PKO.AX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to PKO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PKO.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs NFL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, NFL.AX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while NFL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas NFL.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to NFL.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to NFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check NFL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs COY.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, COY.AX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while COY.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas COY.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to COY.AX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to COY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check COY.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs KFM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, KFM.AX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while KFM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas KFM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to KFM.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to KFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check KFM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs RON.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, RON.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RON.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RON.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RON.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to RON.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check RON.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs LOM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, LOM.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LOM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas LOM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LOM.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to LOM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check LOM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs MOH.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, MOH.AX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while MOH.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas MOH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MOH.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to MOH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check MOH.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SMX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SMX.AX has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SMX.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SMX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SMX.AX's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to SMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SMX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs WRX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, WRX.AX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while WRX.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas WRX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to WRX.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to WRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check WRX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BIM.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BIM.AX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BIM.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BIM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BIM.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BIM.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs TG1.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, TG1.AX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TG1.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas TG1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TG1.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to TG1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check TG1.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs RCR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, RCR.AX has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RCR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas RCR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RCR.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to RCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check RCR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs CBY.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, CBY.AX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CBY.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CBY.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CBY.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to CBY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check CBY.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PRS.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PRS.AX has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PRS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PRS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PRS.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to PRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PRS.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs SQX.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, SQX.AX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while SQX.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas SQX.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SQX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to SQX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check SQX.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs ALV.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ALV.AX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ALV.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ALV.AX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ALV.AX's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to ALV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ALV.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BYH.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BYH.AX has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BYH.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BYH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BYH.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BYH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BYH.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs ABR.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, ABR.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ABR.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas ABR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ABR.AX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to ABR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check ABR.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs PEL.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, PEL.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while PEL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas PEL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PEL.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to PEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check PEL.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs EMS.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, EMS.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while EMS.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas EMS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to EMS.AX's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to EMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check EMS.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs AS2.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, AS2.AX has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while AS2.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas AS2.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to AS2.AX's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to AS2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check AS2.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs BMO.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, BMO.AX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while BMO.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas BMO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BMO.AX's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is more volatile compared to BMO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check BMO.AX's competition here
NWF.AX vs CUS.AX Comparison April 2026
NWF.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWF.AX stands at 83.7M. In comparison, CUS.AX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWF.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CUS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWF.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.56, whereas CUS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NWF.AX's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CUS.AX's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWF.AX is less volatile compared to CUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWF.AX.Check CUS.AX's competition here