Novartis AG
Novartis AG (NVS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - General Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVS | $163.92 | +0.00% | 314.5B | 22.78 | $7.14 | +2.01% |
| LLY | $1,023.22 | +0.00% | 952.9B | 43.99 | $22.96 | +0.62% |
| AZN | $208.62 | +1.05% | 633.8B | 31.30 | $6.53 | +1.82% |
| JNJ | $246.91 | +0.00% | 584.4B | 22.01 | $11.02 | +2.10% |
| ABBV | $224.35 | +0.00% | 397.6B | 95.32 | $2.36 | +2.94% |
| MRK | $121.86 | +0.00% | 305.4B | 16.80 | $7.28 | +2.68% |
| NVO | $48.45 | +0.00% | 210.9B | 12.96 | $3.66 | +2.59% |
| AMGN | $375.50 | +0.00% | 202B | 26.34 | $14.23 | +2.58% |
| GILD | $151.12 | +0.00% | 187.8B | 18.58 | $8.15 | +2.09% |
| PFE | $26.86 | +0.00% | 151.6B | 19.60 | $1.36 | +6.47% |
Stock Comparison
NVS vs LLY Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, LLY has a market cap of 952.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while LLY trades at $1,023.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LLY's P/E ratio is 43.99. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LLY's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to LLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check LLY's competition here
NVS vs AZN Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, AZN has a market cap of 633.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while AZN trades at $208.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AZN's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to AZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check AZN's competition here
NVS vs JNJ Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, JNJ has a market cap of 584.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while JNJ trades at $246.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas JNJ's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JNJ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to JNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check JNJ's competition here
NVS vs ABBV Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, ABBV has a market cap of 397.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while ABBV trades at $224.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ABBV's P/E ratio is 95.32. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ABBV's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to ABBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check ABBV's competition here
NVS vs MRK Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, MRK has a market cap of 305.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while MRK trades at $121.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MRK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MRK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to MRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check MRK's competition here
NVS vs NVO Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, NVO has a market cap of 210.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while NVO trades at $48.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas NVO's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NVO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to NVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check NVO's competition here
NVS vs AMGN Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, AMGN has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while AMGN trades at $375.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AMGN's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AMGN's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to AMGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check AMGN's competition here
NVS vs GILD Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, GILD has a market cap of 187.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while GILD trades at $151.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GILD's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GILD's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to GILD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check GILD's competition here
NVS vs PFE Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, PFE has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while PFE trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas PFE's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PFE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to PFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check PFE's competition here
NVS vs BMY Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, BMY has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while BMY trades at $60.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BMY's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BMY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to BMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check BMY's competition here
NVS vs GSK Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, GSK has a market cap of 120.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while GSK trades at $60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GSK's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GSK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to GSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check GSK's competition here
NVS vs SNY Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, SNY has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while SNY trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SNY's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to SNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check SNY's competition here
NVS vs BIIB Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, BIIB has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while BIIB trades at $192.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BIIB's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BIIB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to BIIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check BIIB's competition here
NVS vs HZNP Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, HZNP has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while HZNP trades at $116.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas HZNP's P/E ratio is 61.86. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HZNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is more volatile compared to HZNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check HZNP's competition here
NVS vs GRFS Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, GRFS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while GRFS trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GRFS's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GRFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to GRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check GRFS's competition here
NVS vs OGN Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, OGN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while OGN trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas OGN's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OGN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to OGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check OGN's competition here
NVS vs CELG-RI Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, CELG-RI has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while CELG-RI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas CELG-RI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CELG-RI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to CELG-RI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check CELG-RI's competition here
NVS vs CTOR Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, CTOR has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while CTOR trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas CTOR's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CTOR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to CTOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check CTOR's competition here
NVS vs SCLX Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, SCLX has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while SCLX trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SCLX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SCLX's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to SCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check SCLX's competition here
NVS vs MIRA Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, MIRA has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while MIRA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MIRA's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MIRA's ROE of -9.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to MIRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check MIRA's competition here
NVS vs SRXH Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, SRXH has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while SRXH trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SRXH's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SRXH's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to SRXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check SRXH's competition here
NVS vs SCLXW Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, SCLXW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while SCLXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SCLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SCLXW's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is more volatile compared to SCLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check SCLXW's competition here
NVS vs BDSIW Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, BDSIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while BDSIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BDSIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BDSIW's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to BDSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check BDSIW's competition here
NVS vs CRXT Comparison February 2026
NVS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVS stands at 314.5B. In comparison, CRXT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NVS is priced at $163.92, while CRXT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas CRXT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NVS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRXT's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NVS is less volatile compared to CRXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVS.Check CRXT's competition here