Nufarm Limited

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, YARIY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while YARIY trades at $18.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas YARIY's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YARIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to YARIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check YARIY's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, PHOJY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while PHOJY trades at $22.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas PHOJY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHOJY's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and PHOJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHOJY's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, YRAIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while YRAIF trades at $37.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas YRAIF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YRAIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to YRAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check YRAIF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, BLONF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while BLONF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas BLONF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLONF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to BLONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check BLONF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, KPLUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while KPLUF trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas KPLUF's P/E ratio is 1485.00. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KPLUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to KPLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check KPLUF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, TSDOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while TSDOF trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas TSDOF's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSDOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to TSDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check TSDOF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, SNFRY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while SNFRY trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas SNFRY's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNFRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to SNFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check SNFRY's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, CBLUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while CBLUF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas CBLUF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBLUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to CBLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check CBLUF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, SNFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while SNFRF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas SNFRF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNFRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to SNFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check SNFRF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, CBLUY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while CBLUY trades at $11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas CBLUY's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBLUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and CBLUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBLUY's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, BWEL has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while BWEL trades at $519.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas BWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWEL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to BWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check BWEL's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, MBCF has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while MBCF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas MBCF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to MBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check MBCF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, DNKLY has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while DNKLY trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas DNKLY's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNKLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to DNKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check DNKLY's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, EMSNF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while EMSNF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas EMSNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMSNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and EMSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMSNF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, PLHCF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while PLHCF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas PLHCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLHCF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and PLHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLHCF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, KNGW has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while KNGW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas KNGW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNGW's ROE of -8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and KNGW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNGW's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, MGROF has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while MGROF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas MGROF's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGROF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and MGROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGROF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, HMIFF has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while HMIFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas HMIFF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMIFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to HMIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check HMIFF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, VNPKF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while VNPKF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas VNPKF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNPKF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to VNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check VNPKF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, EDNSF has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while EDNSF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas EDNSF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EDNSF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to EDNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check EDNSF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, FTZZF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while FTZZF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas FTZZF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTZZF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to FTZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check FTZZF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, ARLSF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while ARLSF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas ARLSF's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARLSF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to ARLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check ARLSF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, LBTD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while LBTD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas LBTD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LBTD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to LBTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check LBTD's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, VVIVF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while VVIVF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas VVIVF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VVIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to VVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check VVIVF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, KRLTF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while KRLTF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas KRLTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRLTF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to KRLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check KRLTF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, APEOF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while APEOF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas APEOF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APEOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to APEOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check APEOF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, BEVVF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while BEVVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas BEVVF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEVVF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and BEVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEVVF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, ALGWF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while ALGWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas ALGWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALGWF's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to ALGWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check ALGWF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, PTAM has a market cap of 384.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while PTAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas PTAM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and PTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTAM's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, EACTF has a market cap of 289.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while EACTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas EACTF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EACTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to EACTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check EACTF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, AGYP has a market cap of 194.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while AGYP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas AGYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGYP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to AGYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check AGYP's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, MAAFF has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while MAAFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas MAAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAAFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to MAAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check MAAFF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, KWBT has a market cap of 56.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while KWBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas KWBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KWBT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and KWBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWBT's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, IGNE has a market cap of 15.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while IGNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas IGNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IGNE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to IGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check IGNE's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, KGET has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while KGET trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas KGET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KGET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and KGET have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGET's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, HFGVF has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while HFGVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas HFGVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HFGVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to HFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check HFGVF's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, SLCO has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while SLCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas SLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLCO's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and SLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLCO's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, BIONQ has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while BIONQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas BIONQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIONQ's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to BIONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check BIONQ's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, HUMT has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while HUMT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas HUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUMT's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and HUMT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUMT's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, YUII has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while YUII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas YUII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YUII's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and YUII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUII's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, ITRO has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while ITRO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas ITRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to ITRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check ITRO's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, NOEC has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while NOEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas NOEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOEC's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to NOEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check NOEC's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, PHOS has a market cap of 841. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while PHOS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas PHOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and PHOS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHOS's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, GREN has a market cap of 443. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while GREN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas GREN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF is less volatile compared to GREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NUFMF.Check GREN's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 41. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while USBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USBC's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and USBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USBC's competition here

NUFMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NUFMF stands at 632M. In comparison, QCCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NUFMF is priced at $1.65, while QCCP trades at $1,750.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NUFMF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.25, whereas QCCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NUFMF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QCCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NUFMF and QCCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QCCP's competition here