NetEase, Inc.

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while ATVI trades at $94.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check ATVI's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while EA trades at $199.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 75.06. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check EA's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while RBLX trades at $64.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -40.26. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check RBLX's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TTWO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while TTWO trades at $201.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas TTWO's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTWO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to TTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check TTWO's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while BILI trades at $30.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 116.54. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check BILI's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while PLTK trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check PLTK's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while AVID trades at $27.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check AVID's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while SCPL trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check SCPL's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 492.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while SOHU trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check SOHU's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 449M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GRVY trades at $65.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GRVY's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 437.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while DDI trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check DDI's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GDEV trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GDEV's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GDC trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GDC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GDC's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while MGRT trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check MGRT's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GCL trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 66.94. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GCL's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GMGI trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GMGI's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while MYPS trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check MYPS's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GMHS trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GMHS's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while SKLZ trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check SKLZ's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while BRAG trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check BRAG's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GAME trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GAME's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GAME's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while SNAL trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +21.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check SNAL's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while NCTY trades at $5.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check NCTY's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GIGM trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GIGM's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while MSGM trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check MSGM's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GXAI trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GXAI's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while MGAM trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -3.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check MGAM's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GCLWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GCLWW's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while TBH trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TBH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check TBH's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while NFTG trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check NFTG's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 889.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is more volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check MYPSW's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 848.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while TRUG trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRUG's ROE of -56.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check TRUG's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 793.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while BHAT trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check BHAT's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 281K. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GDEVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check GDEVW's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while GGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTES has daily volatility of 0.95 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while HPY trades at $103.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check HPY's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while YVR trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check YVR's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while SCR trades at $35.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check SCR's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check ZNGA's competition here

NTES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTES stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTES is priced at $119.16, while CCNC trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTES currently has a P/E ratio of 15.60, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTES's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTES is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTES.Check CCNC's competition here