Northern Superior Resources Inc.
Northern Superior Resources Inc. (NSUPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NSUPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSUPF | $0.90 | +1.98% | 148.1M | -17.20 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.85 | -0.70% | 77.1B | 15.47 | $0.19 | +1.80% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +747.44% |
| GFIOF | $25.38 | +0.00% | 22.7B | 18.39 | $1.38 | +2.15% |
| NESRF | $11.29 | -0.96% | 16.6B | 21.91 | $0.53 | +2.77% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $52.94 | -1.61% | 13.9B | 25.87 | $2.22 | +2.68% |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| CAHPF | $4.78 | -4.69% | 10B | 21.74 | $0.23 | +1.56% |
Stock Comparison
NSUPF vs ZIJMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ZIJMF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
NSUPF vs OPYGY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OPYGY's competition here
NSUPF vs GFIOF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while GFIOF trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GFIOF's competition here
NSUPF vs NESRF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while NESRF trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NESRF's competition here
NSUPF vs NSTYY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NSTYY's competition here
NSUPF vs NCMGY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NCMGY's competition here
NSUPF vs LUGDF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while LUGDF trades at $52.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check LUGDF's competition here
NSUPF vs NCMGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NCMGF's competition here
NSUPF vs CAHPF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while CAHPF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CAHPF's competition here
NSUPF vs HGMCF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HGMCF's competition here
NSUPF vs ZHAOF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
NSUPF vs EDVMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while EDVMF trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check EDVMF's competition here
NSUPF vs AULGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AULGF's competition here
NSUPF vs SBYSF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SBYSF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SBYSF's competition here
NSUPF vs ARGTF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ARGTF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -283.57. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ARGTF's competition here
NSUPF vs ZIJMY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ZIJMY trades at $56.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
NSUPF vs OCANF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OCANF trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OCANF's competition here
NSUPF vs DGMLF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DGMLF's competition here
NSUPF vs PMNXF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while PMNXF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PMNXF's competition here
NSUPF vs GRLGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GRLGF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMLRF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RMLRF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMLRF's competition here
NSUPF vs DPMLF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while DPMLF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DPMLF's competition here
NSUPF vs GSISF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while GSISF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GSISF's competition here
NSUPF vs KNTNF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while KNTNF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KNTNF's competition here
NSUPF vs TORXF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while TORXF trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check TORXF's competition here
NSUPF vs CRNLF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while CRNLF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CRNLF's competition here
NSUPF vs ELKMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ELKMF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ELKMF's competition here
NSUPF vs CELTF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CELTF's competition here
NSUPF vs REDLF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while REDLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check REDLF's competition here
NSUPF vs HCHDF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while HCHDF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HCHDF's competition here
NSUPF vs WFRSF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while WFRSF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WFRSF's competition here
NSUPF vs ORAAF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ORAAF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ORAAF's competition here
NSUPF vs RGRNF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RGRNF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -264.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RGRNF's competition here
NSUPF vs KOZAY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KOZAY's competition here
NSUPF vs WDOFF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while WDOFF trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WDOFF's competition here
NSUPF vs CXBMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CXBMF's competition here
NSUPF vs EOGSF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while EOGSF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check EOGSF's competition here
NSUPF vs MAUTF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while MAUTF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MAUTF's competition here
NSUPF vs OBNNF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OBNNF's competition here
NSUPF vs PAFRF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PAFRF's competition here
NSUPF vs DRDGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while DRDGF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DRDGF's competition here
NSUPF vs SNWGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SNWGF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -49.29. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SNWGF's competition here
NSUPF vs AURQF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AURQF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMGGY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RMGGY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMGGY's competition here
NSUPF vs HCHDY Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HCHDY's competition here
NSUPF vs SVLKF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SVLKF's competition here
NSUPF vs MWSNF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 905.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while MWSNF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -70.19. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MWSNF's competition here
NSUPF vs SGSVF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SGSVF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMGGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 871M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RMGGF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -40.90. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMGGF's competition here
NSUPF vs BELGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 870.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while BELGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check BELGF's competition here
NSUPF vs RUPRF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 869.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RUPRF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -185.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RUPRF's competition here
NSUPF vs KRRGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KRRGF's competition here
NSUPF vs ALKEF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 756.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ALKEF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ALKEF's competition here
NSUPF vs PDIYF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 734.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while PDIYF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PDIYF's competition here
NSUPF vs WTGRF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WTGRF's competition here
NSUPF vs RGDFF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RGDFF's competition here
NSUPF vs ASGOF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 585.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ASGOF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ASGOF's competition here
NSUPF vs MNSAF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 578.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while MNSAF trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MNSAF's competition here
NSUPF vs GUYGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 565.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while GUYGF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -78.13. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GUYGF's competition here
NSUPF vs NVMLF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NVMLF's competition here
NSUPF vs RIOFF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RIOFF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 119.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RIOFF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMLFF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RMLFF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMLFF's competition here
NSUPF vs OSKA Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OSKA's competition here
NSUPF vs RSRBF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 479.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while RSRBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 82.33. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RSRBF's competition here
NSUPF vs ARNGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ARNGF's competition here
NSUPF vs ORZCF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 448.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ORZCF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ORZCF's competition here
NSUPF vs GDRZF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 447.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while GDRZF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -18.86. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GDRZF's competition here
NSUPF vs ECRTF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 422M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ECRTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ECRTF's competition here
NSUPF vs KSKGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while KSKGF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KSKGF's competition here
NSUPF vs MAKOF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while MAKOF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MAKOF's competition here
NSUPF vs LMGDF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check LMGDF's competition here
NSUPF vs OMGGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OMGGF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OMGGF's competition here
NSUPF vs THXPF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 372.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while THXPF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check THXPF's competition here
NSUPF vs MNDJF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while MNDJF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MNDJF's competition here
NSUPF vs ELEMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ELEMF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ELEMF's competition here
NSUPF vs TPRXF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check TPRXF's competition here
NSUPF vs PROBF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 339.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while PROBF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PROBF's competition here
NSUPF vs OGNRF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OGNRF's competition here
NSUPF vs AGXKF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while AGXKF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AGXKF's competition here
NSUPF vs MGDPF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MGDPF's competition here
NSUPF vs OSIIF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OSIIF's competition here
NSUPF vs ERRSF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ERRSF's competition here
NSUPF vs JAGGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 245.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while JAGGF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check JAGGF's competition here
NSUPF vs HSTXF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 239.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while HSTXF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HSTXF's competition here
NSUPF vs GGAZF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while GGAZF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GGAZF's competition here
NSUPF vs STPGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 233.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while STPGF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check STPGF's competition here
NSUPF vs WRLGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 225.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while WRLGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WRLGF's competition here
NSUPF vs FDMIF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while FDMIF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -54.25. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check FDMIF's competition here
NSUPF vs THSGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 203.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while THSGF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -79.38. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check THSGF's competition here
NSUPF vs SRBIF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SRBIF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SRBIF's competition here
NSUPF vs SITKF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SITKF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -54.05. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SITKF's competition here
NSUPF vs TGMGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, TGMGF has a market cap of 199.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while TGMGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas TGMGF's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to TGMGF's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to TGMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check TGMGF's competition here
NSUPF vs SAAGF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SAAGF's competition here
NSUPF vs CNLMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CNLMF's competition here
NSUPF vs STBMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while STBMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check STBMF's competition here
NSUPF vs DCCNF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DCCNF's competition here
NSUPF vs CNMXF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CNMXF's competition here
NSUPF vs AMXEF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, AMXEF has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while AMXEF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas AMXEF's P/E ratio is -67.40. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to AMXEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AMXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AMXEF's competition here
NSUPF vs EEYMF Comparison August 2025
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 148.1M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $0.90, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -17.20, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check EEYMF's competition here