Northern Shield Resources Inc.
Northern Shield Resources Inc. NSHRF Peers
See (NSHRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSHRF | $0.05 | +6.61% | 5.3M | -1.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.00 | -0.01% | 126.9B | 11.16 | $2.24 | +4.96% |
| RTNTF | $76.57 | +0.09% | 106.4B | 10.81 | $7.08 | +3.07% |
| RTPPF | $62.00 | -1.54% | 106B | 8.77 | $7.07 | +6.48% |
| GLCNF | $3.72 | +1.09% | 44.7B | -28.62 | -$0.13 | +3.09% |
| GLNCY | $7.39 | +1.39% | 44.4B | -28.43 | -$0.26 | +2.94% |
| GMBXF | $5.56 | +3.04% | 43.3B | 12.09 | $0.46 | +4.59% |
| NGLOY | $15.15 | +1.41% | 36.8B | -11.93 | -$1.27 | +2.15% |
| AAUKF | $30.28 | +2.25% | 36.7B | -11.97 | -$2.53 | +2.14% |
| FSUMF | $10.50 | +1.45% | 32.3B | 8.27 | $1.27 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
NSHRF vs BHPLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while BHPLF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs RTNTF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while RTNTF trades at $76.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs RTPPF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while RTPPF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs GLCNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while GLCNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.62. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs GLNCY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while GLNCY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs GMBXF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while GMBXF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs NGLOY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while NGLOY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AAUKF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AAUKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs FSUMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while FSUMF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs FSUGY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while FSUGY trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs CMCLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while CMCLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs TCKRF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs IVPAF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while IVPAF trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs BOLIF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs BDNNY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while BDNNY trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs JXMNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SHTLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs IPOAF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while IPOAF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ABML Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs STMNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SMMYY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SMMYY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PUTKF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs LYSCF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while LYSCF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 172.33. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PUTKY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PUTKY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs LYSDY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while LYSDY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 172.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs NILSY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PAEKY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MALRF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MALRY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MALRY trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs FLMMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PILBF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PILBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs CHZQ Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs NGXXF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while NGXXF trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.29. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PTNDY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MIMTF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MIMTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PTNDF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AZZVF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AFBOF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs DWMNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SOUHY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SOUHY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs IIDDY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs NICMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while NICMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs IPGDF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while IPGDF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ERMAY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ERMAF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs DETRF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while DETRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ADTLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ADTLF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ILKAY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AZRMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ADMLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ADMLF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs BQSSF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while BQSSF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ILKAF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs FMCXF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 927.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while FMCXF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs STTSY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ATUSF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 910.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ATUSF trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs LINRF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 907.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while LINRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AFMJF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 903.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AUSDF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs TAOFF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 705.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while TAOFF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AMVMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PXMFF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 619.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PXMFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MFRVF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs VULNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs CTJHF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ALMTF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ALMTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PKREF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 510.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MJDLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MJDLF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs TTNNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs OSTTF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MCRZF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs BIRNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MCHHF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs FGOVF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 387.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while FGOVF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -73.20. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs NQMIY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs REEMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while REEMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MNXMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MNXMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -62.61. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs CTJHY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ERLFF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.60. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs KMRPF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs JMXXF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 333.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while JMXXF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MLYF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs CGMLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 322.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while CGMLF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -20.75. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs AUMTF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs LTSRF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SLGGF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs MLXEF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ERDCF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ERDCF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -79.75. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SVMLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SVMLF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs ARAFF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs FWEDF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while FWEDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs LRSRF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs STQNF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PMETF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PMETF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.33. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SMTSF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SMTSF has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SMTSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SMTSF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SMTSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SMTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs SRHYY Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while SRHYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs RXRLF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs LTHHF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs BSRUF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.
NSHRF vs PTTMF Comparison
NSHRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSHRF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSHRF is priced at $0.05, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSHRF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, NSHRF's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSHRF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSHRF.