Noble Roman's, Inc.
Noble Roman's, Inc. NROM Peers
See (NROM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NROM | $0.18 | -12.38% | 4.09M | 18.40 | $0.01 | N/A |
| CMPGF | $35.63 | +0.77% | 60.48B | 41.43 | $0.86 | +1.66% |
| CMPGY | $35.18 | +0.31% | 59.71B | 40.91 | $0.86 | +1.70% |
| RSTRF | $67.04 | N/A | 30.39B | 22.57 | $2.97 | +3.52% |
| HDALF | $1.89 | N/A | 10.23B | 15.75 | $0.12 | +1.15% |
| JBFCY | $18.75 | +0.67% | 5.25B | 30.24 | $0.62 | +1.21% |
| MDNDF | $39.35 | N/A | 5.23B | 24.14 | $1.63 | +0.79% |
| JBFCF | $4.50 | +1.76% | 5.04B | 30.00 | $0.15 | +1.21% |
| ATGSY | $6.55 | N/A | 2.50B | -40.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| SKLYF | $10.70 | N/A | 2.43B | 152.86 | $0.07 | +0.01% |
Stock Comparison
NROM vs CMPGF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 60.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while CMPGF trades at $35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and CMPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs CMPGY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 59.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while CMPGY trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs RSTRF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 30.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while RSTRF trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to RSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs HDALF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while HDALF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to HDALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs JBFCY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while JBFCY trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MDNDF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MDNDF trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to MDNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs JBFCF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while JBFCF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and JBFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs ATGSY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ATGSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs SKLYF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to SKLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs DLII Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to DLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs ATGSF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATGSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ATGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs SGLOF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to SGLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs ALSSF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ALSSF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ALSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs HLFFF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while HLFFF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to HLFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs HELFY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while HELFY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to HELFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs ARHOF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ARHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs MBPFF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MBPFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to MBPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs SSPPF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while SSPPF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSPPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and SSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs DMZPY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while DMZPY trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is 204.38. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to DMZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs DPZUF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while DPZUF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is 181.11. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DPZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to DPZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs DPUKY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while DPUKY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and DPUKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs DMPZF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while DMPZF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and DMPZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs ELORY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELORY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ELORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs LKNCY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while LKNCY trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs JDWPY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while JDWPY trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to JDWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs JDWPF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while JDWPF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to JDWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MTYFF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 748.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MTYFF trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 125.15. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs RSTGF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and RSTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs ELROF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 616.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ELROF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELROF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to ELROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs CLLFF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 572.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while CLLFF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and CLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs CFCGF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 531.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while CFCGF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MLYSF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and MLYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs FBGI Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 368.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while FBGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and FBGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs FMBRY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 288.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while FMBRY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to FMBRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MARZF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 285.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MARZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MARZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to MARZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MRTPY Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 281.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MRTPY trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRTPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to MRTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs PZRIF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 280.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while PZRIF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and PZRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs FRWDF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 234.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while FRWDF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to FRWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs RTBRF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 213.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while RTBRF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to RTBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs CRNGF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and CRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs XIAXF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 167.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while XIAXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and XIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs RFGPF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 100.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFGPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MHGU Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 83.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MHGU trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHGU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and MHGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs MHGUP Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 78.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MHGUP trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHGUP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and MHGUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs FRHHF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and FRHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs TNGPF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs GLLDF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and GLLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs FCCI Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while FCCI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and FCCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs SCUPF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 23.88M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while SCUPF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCUPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to SCUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs MORRF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.07M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MORRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and MORRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs ODDAF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 15.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ODDAF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to ODDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs JKHCF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs GGLT Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GGLT trades at $499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to GGLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs COFE Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 3.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while COFE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to COFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs SCFFF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and SCFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs ZAAG Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952803.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ZAAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs BDVB Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 764233.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while BDVB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDVB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to BDVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs KITL Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 448525.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and KITL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs WHCA Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, WHCA has a market cap of 401756.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while WHCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas WHCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHCA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to WHCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs GAMN Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 389931.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GAMN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to GAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs GMPR Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 36282.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GMPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and GMPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs GASMF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29755.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and GASMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs BBUCQ Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17240.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and BBUCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs GTEH Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 13996.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTEH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and GTEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs SWRL Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 11033.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to SWRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs RIBS Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 9755.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and RIBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs PFSF Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 5136.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while PFSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and PFSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs BLUU Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 3727.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and BLUU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs CORG Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2722.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM is less volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NROM.
NROM vs AMHG Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1683.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and AMHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs GCFB Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1436.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCFB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and GCFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs HTRE Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and HTRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NROM vs ULFS Comparison
NROM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NROM stands at 4.09M. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70.00. Regarding current trading prices, NROM is priced at $0.18, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NROM currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NROM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NROM and ULFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).