Nampak Limited

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SMFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 23.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while IP trades at $44.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 23.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while INPAP trades at $68.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INPAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 22.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while AMCCF trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to AMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SW trades at $41.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 21.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while AMCR trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 16.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while PKG trades at $181.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while BALL trades at $52.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BALL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while CCK trades at $97.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 9.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while DITHF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while CCDBF trades at $55.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while CCLLF trades at $52.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SIGCY trades at $20.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 38.82. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SCBGF trades at $20.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SCBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while GPK trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SLGN trades at $49.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while REYN trades at $23.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SEE trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SON trades at $44.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 54.11. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while HOYFF trades at $35.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to HOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while VDRFF trades at $107.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to VDRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while GEF trades at $54.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while GEF-B trades at $59.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while AMBP trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -93.50. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while OI trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while WIPKF trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while ORRYY trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while ORRAF trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to ORRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 984.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while TRS trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 766.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while FUJSF trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 755.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while ELPKF trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to PCTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 611.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while CADNF trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to CADNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 606.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while KRT trades at $30.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 455.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while MYE trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 402.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while HXGCF trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to GRVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to JSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 284.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while PACK trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 162.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SNGSF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to SNGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 99.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while VKSC trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to VKSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 66.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SUMXF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SUMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while IFLXF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to IFLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 27.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while YHGJ trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 18.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while MGIH trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to YIKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 14.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while NEXNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while DSS trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while IDND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while OCTO trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OCTO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 2.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while MAYX trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to MAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while RDVA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while SINC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SINC's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to SINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 975977.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to GDNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134874.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while EPTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 77675.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while TZPC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 44327.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while ACGX trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to ACGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6511.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while PGOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PGOG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is less volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5190.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while ACTX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to ACTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10.00. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while GPRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to GPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.

NPKLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NPKLY stands at 34.69B. In comparison, ARD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NPKLY is priced at $21.00, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NPKLY currently has a P/E ratio of -2100.00, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPKLY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPKLY is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPKLY.