Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, P9D.SI has a market cap of 881.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while P9D.SI trades at SGD 1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas P9D.SI's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to P9D.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is less volatile compared to P9D.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check P9D.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, E3B.SI has a market cap of 592.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while E3B.SI trades at SGD 0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas E3B.SI's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to E3B.SI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is less volatile compared to E3B.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check E3B.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, I07.SI has a market cap of 306M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while I07.SI trades at SGD 0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas I07.SI's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to I07.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is less volatile compared to I07.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check I07.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, MR7.SI has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while MR7.SI trades at SGD 0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas MR7.SI's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MR7.SI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is more volatile compared to MR7.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check MR7.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ER0.SI has a market cap of 176.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while ER0.SI trades at SGD 0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ER0.SI's P/E ratio is -89.34. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ER0.SI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is less volatile compared to ER0.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check ER0.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, J2T.SI has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while J2T.SI trades at SGD 0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas J2T.SI's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to J2T.SI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is more volatile compared to J2T.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check J2T.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, ZXY.SI has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while ZXY.SI trades at SGD 0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ZXY.SI's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ZXY.SI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is more volatile compared to ZXY.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check ZXY.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, 53W.SI has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while 53W.SI trades at SGD 0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas 53W.SI's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to 53W.SI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is more volatile compared to 53W.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check 53W.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, C06.SI has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while C06.SI trades at SGD 0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas C06.SI's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to C06.SI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is more volatile compared to C06.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check C06.SI's competition here

Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SES: NO4.SI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NO4.SI stands at 830.7M. In comparison, 5G9.SI has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NO4.SI is priced at SGD 0.67 on the SES, while 5G9.SI trades at SGD 0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NO4.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas 5G9.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NO4.SI's ROE is +0.50%, compared to 5G9.SI's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NO4.SI is more volatile compared to 5G9.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NO4.SI.Check 5G9.SI's competition here