Nirman Agri Genetics Ltd.

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, HEXAWARE.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while HEXAWARE.NS trades at ₹470.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas HEXAWARE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HEXAWARE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to HEXAWARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check HEXAWARE.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, DOMS.BO has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while DOMS.BO trades at ₹2,295.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas DOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 60.65. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DOMS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to DOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check DOMS.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SAFARIND.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SAFARIND.BO trades at ₹1,915.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SAFARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1394.97. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAFARIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SAFARIND.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ENTERO.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ENTERO.NS trades at ₹1,226.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ENTERO.NS's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ENTERO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ENTERO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ENTERO.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹1,656.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, MEDIASSIST.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while MEDIASSIST.NS trades at ₹313.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas MEDIASSIST.NS's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MEDIASSIST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to MEDIASSIST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check MEDIASSIST.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, RPTECH.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while RPTECH.NS trades at ₹345.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas RPTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RPTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to RPTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check RPTECH.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ALPEXSOLAR.NS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ALPEXSOLAR.NS trades at ₹791.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ALPEXSOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPEXSOLAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ALPEXSOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ALPEXSOLAR.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, AIMTRON.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while AIMTRON.NS trades at ₹786.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas AIMTRON.NS's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AIMTRON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to AIMTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check AIMTRON.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹634.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GRNLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GRNLAMIND.BO trades at ₹556.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GRNLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRNLAMIND.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to GRNLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GRNLAMIND.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹321.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GPTHEALTH.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GPTHEALTH.NS trades at ₹119.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GPTHEALTH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GPTHEALTH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to GPTHEALTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GPTHEALTH.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, VILAS.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while VILAS.NS trades at ₹363.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas VILAS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VILAS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to VILAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check VILAS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.59. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check DPEL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, TAC.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while TAC.NS trades at ₹416.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas TAC.NS's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TAC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to TAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check TAC.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ACCENTMIC.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ACCENTMIC.NS trades at ₹357.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ACCENTMIC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACCENTMIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ACCENTMIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ACCENTMIC.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹167.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, REMUS.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while REMUS.NS trades at ₹628.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas REMUS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to REMUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to REMUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check REMUS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KILPEST.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KILPEST.BO trades at ₹808.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KILPEST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KILPEST.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to KILPEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KILPEST.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ZTECH.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ZTECH.NS trades at ₹518.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ZTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ZTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ZTECH.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, PCCL.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while PCCL.NS trades at ₹250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas PCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.09. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PCCL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to PCCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check PCCL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, DENTALKART.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while DENTALKART.NS trades at ₹395.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas DENTALKART.NS's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DENTALKART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to DENTALKART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check DENTALKART.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GGBL.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GGBL.NS trades at ₹250.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GGBL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to GGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GGBL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, APS.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while APS.NS trades at ₹300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas APS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to APS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to APS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check APS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KRITIIND.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KRITIIND.BO trades at ₹117.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KRITIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KRITIIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to KRITIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KRITIIND.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, BAHETI.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while BAHETI.NS trades at ₹496.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas BAHETI.NS's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAHETI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to BAHETI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check BAHETI.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, EFFWA.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while EFFWA.NS trades at ₹194.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas EFFWA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EFFWA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to EFFWA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check EFFWA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, VIVIANA.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while VIVIANA.NS trades at ₹668.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas VIVIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to VIVIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check VIVIANA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, BASILIC.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while BASILIC.NS trades at ₹182.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas BASILIC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BASILIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to BASILIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check BASILIC.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KOTYARK.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KOTYARK.NS trades at ₹382.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KOTYARK.NS's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTYARK.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to KOTYARK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KOTYARK.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹168.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SJLOGISTIC.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SJLOGISTIC.NS trades at ₹264.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SJLOGISTIC.NS's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SJLOGISTIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to SJLOGISTIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SJLOGISTIC.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check WSIND.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, VISHNUINFR.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while VISHNUINFR.NS trades at ₹135.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas VISHNUINFR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VISHNUINFR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNUINFR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check VISHNUINFR.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SEJAL.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SEJAL.BO trades at ₹307.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SEJAL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SEJAL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to SEJAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SEJAL.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, MOS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while MOS.NS trades at ₹10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas MOS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MOS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to MOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check MOS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ATMASTCO.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ATMASTCO.NS trades at ₹115.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ATMASTCO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATMASTCO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ATMASTCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ATMASTCO.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, TRANSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while TRANSTEEL.NS trades at ₹143.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas TRANSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRANSTEEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check TRANSTEEL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, HIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while HIGREEN.NS trades at ₹111.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas HIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HIGREEN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to HIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check HIGREEN.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, INFOLLION.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while INFOLLION.NS trades at ₹278.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas INFOLLION.NS's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INFOLLION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to INFOLLION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check INFOLLION.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ANNAPURNA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ANNAPURNA.NS trades at ₹149.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ANNAPURNA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ANNAPURNA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to ANNAPURNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ANNAPURNA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, RBMINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while RBMINFRA.NS trades at ₹325.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas RBMINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RBMINFRA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to RBMINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check RBMINFRA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, LAKSHVILAS.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while LAKSHVILAS.NS trades at ₹7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas LAKSHVILAS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAKSHVILAS.NS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to LAKSHVILAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check LAKSHVILAS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, YASHOPTICS.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while YASHOPTICS.NS trades at ₹107.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas YASHOPTICS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to YASHOPTICS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to YASHOPTICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check YASHOPTICS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GSMFOILS.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GSMFOILS.NS trades at ₹194.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GSMFOILS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSMFOILS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to GSMFOILS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GSMFOILS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, PHANTOMFX.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while PHANTOMFX.NS trades at ₹179.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas PHANTOMFX.NS's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PHANTOMFX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to PHANTOMFX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check PHANTOMFX.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, AKSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while AKSCHEM.BO trades at ₹281.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas AKSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to AKSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check AKSCHEM.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, MASON.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while MASON.NS trades at ₹128.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas MASON.NS's P/E ratio is 67.37. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MASON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to MASON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check MASON.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, FELIX.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while FELIX.NS trades at ₹172.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas FELIX.NS's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FELIX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to FELIX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check FELIX.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, AVPINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while AVPINFRA.NS trades at ₹88.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas AVPINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVPINFRA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to AVPINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check AVPINFRA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, PRATHAM.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while PRATHAM.NS trades at ₹112.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas PRATHAM.NS's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRATHAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to PRATHAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check PRATHAM.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GIRRESORTS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GIRRESORTS.NS trades at ₹113.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GIRRESORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 3788.33. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GIRRESORTS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to GIRRESORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GIRRESORTS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, MNKCMILTD.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while MNKCMILTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas MNKCMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 125.80. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MNKCMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to MNKCMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check MNKCMILTD.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, MNKALCOLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while MNKALCOLTD.BO trades at ₹27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas MNKALCOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -52.02. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MNKALCOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to MNKALCOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check MNKALCOLTD.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, LAWSIKHO.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while LAWSIKHO.NS trades at ₹110.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas LAWSIKHO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAWSIKHO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to LAWSIKHO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check LAWSIKHO.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, TUNWAL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while TUNWAL.NS trades at ₹29.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas TUNWAL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TUNWAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to TUNWAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check TUNWAL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SPCL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SPCL.NS trades at ₹68.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPCL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to SPCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SPCL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, UVSL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while UVSL.NS trades at ₹0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas UVSL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UVSL.NS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to UVSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check UVSL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, AREYDRG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while AREYDRG.BO trades at ₹61.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas AREYDRG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AREYDRG.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to AREYDRG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check AREYDRG.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, AURDIS.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while AURDIS.NS trades at ₹140.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas AURDIS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AURDIS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to AURDIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check AURDIS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ITCONS.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ITCONS.BO trades at ₹265.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ITCONS.BO's P/E ratio is 95.59. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITCONS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ITCONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ITCONS.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, DENEERS.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while DENEERS.NS trades at ₹157.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas DENEERS.NS's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DENEERS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to DENEERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check DENEERS.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, WINSOL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while WINSOL.NS trades at ₹110.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas WINSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WINSOL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to WINSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check WINSOL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KCEIL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KCEIL.NS trades at ₹110.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KCEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KCEIL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to KCEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KCEIL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, DIGIKORE.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while DIGIKORE.NS trades at ₹77.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas DIGIKORE.NS's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGIKORE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to DIGIKORE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check DIGIKORE.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, TBI.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while TBI.NS trades at ₹58.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas TBI.NS's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TBI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to TBI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check TBI.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, WOMANCART.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while WOMANCART.NS trades at ₹151.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas WOMANCART.NS's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WOMANCART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to WOMANCART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check WOMANCART.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GREENCHEF.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GREENCHEF.NS trades at ₹43.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GREENCHEF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GREENCHEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to GREENCHEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GREENCHEF.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KCK.NS has a market cap of 998.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KCK.NS trades at ₹14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KCK.NS's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KCK.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to KCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KCK.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, OLIL.NS has a market cap of 994.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while OLIL.NS trades at ₹317.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas OLIL.NS's P/E ratio is 72.04. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OLIL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to OLIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check OLIL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, IEML.NS has a market cap of 974.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while IEML.NS trades at ₹69.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas IEML.NS's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IEML.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to IEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check IEML.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, VBCFERROQ.BO has a market cap of 695M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while VBCFERROQ.BO trades at ₹42.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas VBCFERROQ.BO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VBCFERROQ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to VBCFERROQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check VBCFERROQ.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GGDANDE.BO has a market cap of 684.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GGDANDE.BO trades at ₹143.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GGDANDE.BO's P/E ratio is -21.46. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GGDANDE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to GGDANDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GGDANDE.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, RILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 665.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while RILINFRA.NS trades at ₹35.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas RILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RILINFRA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to RILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check RILINFRA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, CIMMCO.NS has a market cap of 600.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while CIMMCO.NS trades at ₹21.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas CIMMCO.NS's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIMMCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to CIMMCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check CIMMCO.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KONSTELEC.NS has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KONSTELEC.NS trades at ₹29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KONSTELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KONSTELEC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to KONSTELEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KONSTELEC.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, TRELCHE-B.BO has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while TRELCHE-B.BO trades at ₹20.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas TRELCHE-B.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRELCHE-B.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to TRELCHE-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check TRELCHE-B.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, PINCON.NS has a market cap of 329.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while PINCON.NS trades at ₹6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas PINCON.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PINCON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NIRMAN.NS has daily volatility of 3.89 and PINCON.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check PINCON.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, PRECISION.NS has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while PRECISION.NS trades at ₹7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas PRECISION.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRECISION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to PRECISION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check PRECISION.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ESSARSEC.BO has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ESSARSEC.BO trades at ₹11.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ESSARSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -71.60. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ESSARSEC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ESSARSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ESSARSEC.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, INNOVATIVE.NS has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while INNOVATIVE.NS trades at ₹161.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas INNOVATIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INNOVATIVE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NIRMAN.NS has daily volatility of 3.89 and INNOVATIVE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check INNOVATIVE.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KTL.NS has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KTL.NS trades at ₹4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KTL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KTL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to KTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KTL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SAHAJ.NS has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SAHAJ.NS trades at ₹4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SAHAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAHAJ.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to SAHAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SAHAJ.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, NAKODA.NS has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while NAKODA.NS trades at ₹0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas NAKODA.NS's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAKODA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NIRMAN.NS has daily volatility of 3.89 and NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check NAKODA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ZSARVAMA.BO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ZSARVAMA.BO trades at ₹52.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ZSARVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSARVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ZSARVAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ZSARVAMA.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ALNATRD.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ALNATRD.BO trades at ₹28.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ALNATRD.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALNATRD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ALNATRD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ALNATRD.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, KEYFINSER.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while KEYFINSER.BO trades at ₹122.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas KEYFINSER.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KEYFINSER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to KEYFINSER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check KEYFINSER.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ZPRBHSTE.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ZPRBHSTE.BO trades at ₹179.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ZPRBHSTE.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPRBHSTE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ZPRBHSTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ZPRBHSTE.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, JSLL-ST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while JSLL-ST.NS trades at ₹1,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas JSLL-ST.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSLL-ST.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to JSLL-ST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check JSLL-ST.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ZSATYASL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ZSATYASL.BO trades at ₹3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ZSATYASL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSATYASL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ZSATYASL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ZSATYASL.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, JTLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while JTLINFRA.NS trades at ₹295.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas JTLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JTLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to JTLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check JTLINFRA.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, SAKUMA-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while SAKUMA-RE.NS trades at ₹1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas SAKUMA-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAKUMA-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to SAKUMA-RE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check SAKUMA-RE.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, IIFL-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while IIFL-RE.NS trades at ₹80.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas IIFL-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IIFL-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is less volatile compared to IIFL-RE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check IIFL-RE.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, OPAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while OPAL.NS trades at ₹43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas OPAL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OPAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NIRMAN.NS has daily volatility of 3.89 and OPAL.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check OPAL.NS's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, RAIDEEPIND.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while RAIDEEPIND.BO trades at ₹10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas RAIDEEPIND.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAIDEEPIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to RAIDEEPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check RAIDEEPIND.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, PUNCTRD.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while PUNCTRD.BO trades at ₹10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas PUNCTRD.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PUNCTRD.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to PUNCTRD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check PUNCTRD.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, ZMANSOON.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while ZMANSOON.BO trades at ₹2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas ZMANSOON.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMANSOON.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to ZMANSOON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check ZMANSOON.BO's competition here

NIRMAN.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIRMAN.NS stands at 526.4M. In comparison, GDTRAGN.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIRMAN.NS is priced at ₹44.30, while GDTRAGN.BO trades at ₹21.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIRMAN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1.23, whereas GDTRAGN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIRMAN.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GDTRAGN.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIRMAN.NS is more volatile compared to GDTRAGN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIRMAN.NS.Check GDTRAGN.BO's competition here