Nio Strategic Metals Inc.
Nio Strategic Metals Inc. NIOCF Peers
See (NIOCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIOCF | $0.04 | N/A | 4.3M | -4.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.27 | -3.51% | 123.2B | 10.83 | $2.24 | +5.11% |
| RTNTF | $71.23 | -1.06% | 117.2B | 10.08 | $7.07 | +3.30% |
| RTPPF | $59.46 | +2.18% | 101.3B | 8.41 | $7.07 | +6.76% |
| GLCNF | $3.87 | -1.53% | 46.1B | -29.77 | -$0.13 | +2.97% |
| GLNCY | $7.72 | -2.14% | 46.1B | -28.59 | -$0.27 | +2.78% |
| GMBXF | $5.75 | +2.13% | 44.8B | 11.98 | $0.48 | +4.37% |
| AAUKF | $31.15 | +2.87% | 43B | -10.85 | -$2.87 | +2.04% |
| NGLOY | $15.43 | +2.23% | 32.9B | -10.71 | -$1.44 | +1.86% |
| FSUMF | $10.55 | +3.43% | 32.4B | 8.31 | $1.27 | +8.39% |
Stock Comparison
NIOCF vs BHPLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BHPLF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs RTNTF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while RTNTF trades at $71.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs RTPPF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while RTPPF trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs GLCNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while GLCNF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs GLNCY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while GLNCY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.59. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs GMBXF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while GMBXF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AAUKF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AAUKF trades at $31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs NGLOY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while NGLOY trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs FSUMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while FSUMF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs FSUGY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while FSUGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs CMCLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while CMCLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs TCKRF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs IVPAF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while IVPAF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs IPOAF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while IPOAF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs BOLIF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs BDNNY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BDNNY trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs JXMNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs SHTLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ABML Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs STMNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs SMMYY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while SMMYY trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.70. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs LYSCF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while LYSCF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 197.33. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs LYSDY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while LYSDY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 196.33. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PUTKF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PUTKY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PUTKY trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs NILSY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PAEKY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MALRY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MALRY trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MALRF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs FLMMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PILBF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PILBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs CHZQ Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs NGXXF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while NGXXF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -42.61. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PTNDY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MIMTF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs IPGDF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while IPGDF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs NICMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PTNDF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs IIDDY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AZZVF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AFBOF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs DWMNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs SOUHY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while SOUHY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.70. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ERMAY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ERMAF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs DETRF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while DETRF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ADMLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ADMLF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ADTLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ADTLF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AZRMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ILKAF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ILKAF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ILKAY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ILKAY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AUSDF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MFRVF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs BQSSF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BQSSF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs FMCXF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while FMCXF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -60.07. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs LINRF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 989.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while LINRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -40.75. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs STTSY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ATUSF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 913.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ATUSF trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs TAOFF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while TAOFF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AFMJF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 759.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AFMJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AMVMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ALMTF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 654.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ALMTF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs CTJHF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PXMFF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 554.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs VULNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 537.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while VULNF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MJDLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MJDLF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs JMXXF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while JMXXF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs TTNNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs OSTTF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PKREF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MCRZF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MCHHF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs FGOVF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while FGOVF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -82.37. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs BIRNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MNXMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs REEMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while REEMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs NQMIY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs AUMTF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs CTJHY Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs CGMLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while CGMLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs FWEDF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 337.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while FWEDF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs KMRPF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MLYF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs SVMLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while SVMLF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ERLFF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ERLFF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MLXEF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ARAFF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs SLGGF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while SLGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs BSSMF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs LTSRF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs ERDCF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while ERDCF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -73.40. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs PMETF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while PMETF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -54.35. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs LRSRF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs STQNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MMILF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs RXRLF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs LTHHF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs BSRUF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.
NIOCF vs MGMNF Comparison
NIOCF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIOCF stands at 4.3M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIOCF is priced at $0.04, while MGMNF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIOCF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, NIOCF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NIOCF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIOCF.