Nimy Resources Limited
Nimy Resources Limited NIM.AX Peers
See (NIM.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIM.AX | $0.09 | -7.14% | 18.94M | -9.10 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | $38.35 | -0.72% | 194.62B | 10.99 | $3.49 | +4.96% |
| RIO.AX | $117.00 | -1.58% | 162.98B | 10.63 | $11.01 | +5.26% |
| FMG.AX | $15.51 | -2.39% | 47.69B | 7.87 | $1.97 | +13.79% |
| S32.AX | $3.03 | -1.94% | 13.61B | -37.87 | -$0.08 | +2.14% |
| LYC.AX | $8.13 | N/A | 7.61B | 162.60 | $0.05 | N/A |
| AKE.AX | $9.83 | -5.57% | 6.30B | 9.54 | $1.03 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | $1.00 | N/A | 5.83B | 14.21 | $0.07 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | $23.87 | +0.72% | 4.66B | -3.84 | -$6.22 | N/A |
| PLS.AX | $1.38 | +1.85% | 4.44B | -138.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NIM.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 194.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while BHP.AX trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 162.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while RIO.AX trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 47.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while FMG.AX trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs S32.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 13.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while S32.AX trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is -37.87. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LYC.AX trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 162.60. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AKE.AX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ATM.AX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MIN.AX trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PLS.AX trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while IGO.AX trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while NIC.AX trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AVZ.AX trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while DRR.AX trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ADT.AX trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AZS.AX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ILU.AX trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while BOE.AX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -56.86. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LTR.AX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PRN.AX trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while IPX.AX trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while A4N.AX trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 997.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while DVP.AX trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is -122.67. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 933.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while VUL.AX trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 851.82M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while BCI.AX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AII.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 786.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AII.AX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MCR.AX trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while KLL.AX trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of +74.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LLL.AX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 601.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MAH.AX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 568.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while FFM.AX trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -49.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs G6M.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 548.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while G6M.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 499.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AMI.AX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 478.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while CHN.AX trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.66M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LRS.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 469.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MLX.AX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 445.45M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MAU.AX trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 439.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MAUCA.AX trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -20.92. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 438.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LOT.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 420.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while SVM.AX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 418.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ARU.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 377.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PMT.AX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while RXM.AX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 372.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while JMS.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LPI.AX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 355.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while CAY.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 337.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while KP2.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 335.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MMI.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 328.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while SYR.AX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while BSE.AX trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs INR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 294.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while INR.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 253.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while RHK.AX trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while SO4.AX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 252.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while OMH.AX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 245.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MEI.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 229.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while FEX.AX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 225.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while NTU.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of +54.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 219.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while GRR.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 218.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while RHI.AX trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 217.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while TVN.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 212.88M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PLL.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 197.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while CXO.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 191.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while CTM.AX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 184.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while SYA.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AUT.AX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 178.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while TLG.AX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 170.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while RNU.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 169.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while QGL.AX trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while VIA.AX trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 166.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while NWC.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 164.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AIS.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 163.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while EGR.AX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs TZN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, TZN.AX has a market cap of 152.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while TZN.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas TZN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to TZN.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to TZN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs NMR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, NMR.AX has a market cap of 150.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while NMR.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NMR.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to NMR.AX's ROE of +20.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to NMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs CII.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while CII.AX trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while NCZ.AX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 139.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ZEO.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs STA.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while STA.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 138.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while LIN.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ESS.AX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 124.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ARR.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 122.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ENR.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 116.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AGE.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 115.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PEK.AX trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 111.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while AUE.AX trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 110.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MRL.AX trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 110.66M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ATR.AX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 110.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while WA8.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ZER.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ZER.AX has a market cap of 108.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ZER.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ZER.AX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ZER.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ZER.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 108.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while FHE.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PAN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PAN.AX has a market cap of 103.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PAN.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PAN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PAN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to PAN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 103.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while NVA.AX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs DRX.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, DRX.AX has a market cap of 100.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while DRX.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas DRX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to DRX.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to DRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs A11.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 97.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while A11.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs QPM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, QPM.AX has a market cap of 95.96M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while QPM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas QPM.AX's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to QPM.AX's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to QPM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs MLG.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, MLG.AX has a market cap of 95.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while MLG.AX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas MLG.AX's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to MLG.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to MLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 94.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while PSC.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 94.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while GLN.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 91.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while ASM.AX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.
NIM.AX vs STM.AX Comparison
NIM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIM.AX stands at 18.94M. In comparison, STM.AX has a market cap of 89.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NIM.AX is priced at $0.09, while STM.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas STM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIM.AX's ROE is +5.02%, compared to STM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIM.AX is less volatile compared to STM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIM.AX.